Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Forum Statistics |
» Members: 572
» Latest member: dago17
» Forum threads: 1,817
» Forum posts: 20,038
Full Statistics
|
Online Users |
There are currently 73 online users. » 11 Member(s) | 60 Guest(s) Bing, Google, Greazel, guyfriday, IdeomotorPrisoner, Karl12, KKLoco, Maxmars, sahgwa, SideEyeEverything, TheGoondockSaint, UltraBudgie
|
|
|
Tomb of Beermaker to the Gods discovered |
Posted by: Byrd - 02-21-2024, 01:32 PM - Forum: Ancient & Lost Civilizations
- Replies (4)
|
|
Egypt is an archaeologically active country (as you can probably guess) and although we don't see much about it, there's a lot that's discovered about it each month. While clearing up the courtyard of a large tomb, they came across a new tomb that belonged to a beer maker who brewed special beer for the gods (and the pharaoh) and who was in charge of the storehouses of the pharaoh.
https://www.cnn.com/2014/01/20/world/mea...ewer-tomb/
The article concludes with a note that robberies of archaeological sites have been a problem in the past and that the new site is, thankfully, under heavy guard.
|
|
|
Who You Gonna Call??? |
Posted by: Byrd - 02-21-2024, 01:19 PM - Forum: Paranormal Studies
- Replies (5)
|
|
Ghostbusters!!
An enterprising group of Thai students started a business where they will sleep in a house or an apartment and certify the place to be "ghost free"... (here's the story: https://www.odditycentral.com/news/thai-...rvice.html)
So... would you be a client or a ghostbuster?
I've done a little ghost chasing in my time and would be delighted if someone would pay me to stay somewhere and prove there's no ghost there.
|
|
|
Quantum computers more affected by cosmic rays than we thought |
Posted by: Maxmars - 02-20-2024, 11:10 PM - Forum: Science & Technology
- No Replies
|
|
If there was ever a potential for a game-changing technology, it lies in quantum computing.
But of course, this technology is new, and being 'new' means we don't have all the kinks worked out just yet.
(I say "we" like I have anything to do with it, I'm really just an interested layman.)
Cosmic rays are space-traversing particles (emanations from stars,) they rain down on us pretty much continuously, although for the most part, imperceptibly ...
We've known about cosmic rays since the early 20th century, and it wasn't that no one considered them in regard to quantum device design, their effects were just underestimated.
Quantum computers are elaborate superconducting devices, at this stage, very delicate and sensitive. Relying on quantum mechanical phenomena means a single particle strike to the device can create spontaneous (and fuzzy) data flipping in the superconducting components.
From a publication in Physics World.
Cosmic rays have created headaches in classical computing for decades. When these energetic particles fly in from space and strike a silicon computer chip, one or more bits in the chip may change state, or flip, in ways that programmers never intended. If these errors go uncorrected, damaging glitches may result – including, in one case, injuries to passengers on a Qantas flight after a bit-flip error fed incorrect data to the aeroplane’s instruments.
Now, just like in our day-to-day computing, done on solid-state devices, we have adapted to use 'error-correction' algorithms which identify and mathematically calculate corrections 'on-the-fly' so to speak. A similar approach is used in reading hard drive data, media streaming, electronic messaging, cellphone services, and the like.
However...
After earlier experiments showed that cosmic rays can severely disrupt the operation of superconducting quantum bits (qubits), an international team led by Robert McDermott of the University of Wisconsin-Madison, US, has now concluded that a leading error-correction method is unlikely to fix the problem on its own.
Quantum computing uses surface code error correction, an inventive two-dimensional trick which kind of allows qubits to 'imply' neighboring data structure....
Surface code error correction works by encoding information in a flat sheet of superconducting qubits, each of which is connected to its nearest neighbours. If the error rates of individual qubit operations are low enough, it should be possible to use some of these qubits to identify and correct errors in neighbouring qubits via multi-qubit operations. The other requirement is that errors cannot be correlated – in other words, an error that affects one qubit cannot affect its neighbours at the same time.
... enter the sad news...
Unfortunately, McDermott’s team discovered that errors caused by cosmic rays and gamma rays from background radiation do not meet this second condition.
...
Writing in Nature, the researchers suggest two possible solutions. One is to protect the quantum processor by shielding it with lead and shifting it to an underground site, as is already done for dark matter and neutrino detection experiments that are especially sensitive to radiation. Another is to reduce the sensitivity of the qubits by, for example, adding materials to the chip that can trap quasiparticles or funnel them away from the qubit substrate. “It’s a roadblock that we’re going to get over,” Wilen says, adding that the Wisconsin group plans to explore several of these mitigation strategies in the future.
...
...the group also encountered a thornier problem: the energy released in these strikes ultimately gets transferred to the qubit substrate in the form of phonons, which are vibrations in a material and can lead to the creation of quasiparticles. As these phonons spread, they produce other kinds of correlated errors, and these errors affect the entire millimetre-scale chip. This phenomenon is known as quasiparticle poisoning, and Wilen says it “could be really damaging for error correction” unless it can be mitigated.
Their suggested solution seems to be that quantum computing research be conducted under shielding to offer enhanced protection from cosmic ray strikes...
or ... Bury it, and/or make it less sensitive, it would appear...
But I would think they'll never eliminate all cosmic rays, since some can be tremendously energetic. Feel free to check me, if I'm mistaken.
Anyway... thanks for indulging my little foray into this tiny corner of science news.
|
|
|
Heads Up! Satellite returning to Earth - SPLOOSH! |
Posted by: Maxmars - 02-19-2024, 10:45 PM - Forum: Science & Technology
- Replies (8)
|
|
Yeah, I hate the 'jounalistic' way of making these kinds of OPs... I like to say what I would want to hear, and not...
From FOX weather:
School bus-sized satellite to crash into Earth's atmosphere this week
(even the URL for this story was more informative than the title... www.foxweather.com/earth-space/european-satellite-burn-up-over-earth-atmosphere-february)
The article says that this big satellite will likely not survive the atmospheric re-entry on Wednesday morning, this week.
ESA’s ERS-2 satellite was spotted on January 29, 2024, tumbling as it descends through the atmosphere.
... captured by cameras on board other satellites by Australian company HEO on behalf of the UK Space Agency.
...
Since the spacecraft took a "natural descent" path, ESA could not predict precisely when or where the satellite would come down on Earth but estimated it would happen in February 2024. As the satellite's demise approaches, ESA has been issuing updates.PT
ESA's Space Debris Office released its latest re-entry prediction on Monday, saying the satellite will likely burn up over Earth's atmosphere on Wednesday morning, plus or minus a margin of about 12 hours. The landing and re-entry location uncertainty will decrease as the spacecraft's end nears.
ESA said that at about 50 miles above Earth, the large satellite will break up into small pieces. Any risks from the satellite reentry are very low, according to the space agency.
So, good luck, and maybe you'll actually see the event live in-real-time.
|
|
|
Edward Teller and the 10,000 Megaton Device |
Posted by: theshadowknows - 02-19-2024, 06:07 PM - Forum: Weaponry
- Replies (3)
|
|
The Sundial device, with its terrifying 10 gigaton yield, stands as a haunting monument to humanity's darkest ingenuity, showcasing the depths of our capacity for destruction. Its creation marks not a triumph of engineering, but a descent into the abyss of moral ambiguity, where scientific brilliance is perverted into tools of annihilation. This monstrous contraption, conceived in the depths of strategic thinking, casts a long shadow over the collective conscience of mankind, serving as a grim reminder of the ethical quandry in which we find ourselves entangled.
The very existence of the Sundial device raises profound questions about the nature of progress and the costs of unchecked ambition. As it looms ominously on the horizon of human history, it challenges our complacency and forces us to confront the stark reality of our technological prowess. In the face of such unfathomable destructive potential, the imperative for responsible stewardship of nuclear capabilities becomes all the more urgent. The specter of the Sundial device serves as a somber warning against the hubris of unchecked power and the folly of prioritizing military might over the well-being of humanity. It beckons us to reevaluate our priorities and recommit ourselves to the pursuit of peace and collective security in a world teetering on the brink of nuclear Armageddon.
Quote:The scientist Edward Teller, according to one account, kept a blackboard in his office at Los Alamos during World War II with a list of hypothetical nuclear weapons on it. The last item on his list was the largest one he could imagine. The method of “delivery” — weapon-designer jargon for how you get your bomb from here to there, the target — was listed as “Backyard.” As the scientist who related this anecdote explained, “since that particular design would probably kill everyone on Earth, there was no use carting it anywhere.”
https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2012/09/...gger-boom/
Credit to Alex Wellerstein and his incredible research.
|
|
|
People don't want to admit who it is who is in control of this world. |
Posted by: TheCustodian - 02-19-2024, 04:29 PM - Forum: Secret Societies
- Replies (7)
|
|
Shape-shifters are running the world, and one can see it in certain historical events and anomalies. I argue that individuals who mysteriously vanish or suddenly assume positions of power could be shapeshifters assuming new identities. For example, who ever heard of a certain national leader before that nation was thrown into a war? Yes, him. He’s working with the other one to put on a war that is slowly destroying the world’s military hardware and resources before they take over. There is only one side in the war, and it’s for a purpose. Or what about the richest person in the world being from one of the forest nations and literally trying to blend humanity with technology.
The discrepancies or inconsistencies in historical records are merely attempts by shapeshifters to conceal their true identities or manipulate historical narratives. For example, we have some disagreement regarding the very age of the earth, the age of various nations, the existence of some nations is even in question. I’m not getting into this can of worms right now.
Reports of encounters with beings that can change shape are common. Just do a search for various celebrities and politicians. Consider the word, “Influencer” which has entered the modern lexicon. Who sent them to influence us, and why? We also have symbolism in art, literature, and folklore throughout history in which we see various cultures have depicted shapeshifters in their myths, legends, and art, which some might interpret as evidence of a deeper truth.
They are making heavy use of the internet as well, but of course, it was their idea after all. Most of our technology is. This is why I have shut down all social media, my YouTube, and more. It's time to take life back offline.
|
|
|
Cass Sunstine -- Conspiracy theories |
Posted by: BeTheGoddess - 02-19-2024, 08:39 AM - Forum: Propaganda Mill
- Replies (4)
|
|
Cass Sunstine is a law academic and consultant to a number of organizations, but what I think is relevant here is his work "Conspiracy Theories", its about how using CT stuff can be weaponized and given the nearly 20 years since it was published, I'm sure a lot have tried to use it as a how-to manual...
The abstract:
Quote:Many millions of people hold conspiracy theories; they believe that powerful people have worked together in order to withhold the truth about some important practice or some terrible event. A recent example is the belief, widespread in some parts of the world, that the attacks of 9/11 were carried out not by Al Qaeda, but by Israel or the United States. Those who subscribe to conspiracy theories may create serious risks, including risks of violence, and the existence of such theories raises significant challenges for policy and law. The first challenge is to understand the mechanisms by which conspiracy theories prosper; the second challenge is to understand how such theories might be undermined. Such theories typically spread as a result of identifiable cognitive blunders, operating in conjunction with informational and reputational influences. A distinctive feature of conspiracy theories is their self-sealing quality. Conspiracy theorists are not likely to be persuaded by an attempt to dispel their theories; they may even characterize that very attempt as further proof of the conspiracy. Because those who hold conspiracy theories typically suffer from a “crippled epistemology,” in accordance with which it is rational to hold such theories, the best response consists in cognitive infiltration of extremist groups. Various policy dilemmas, such as the question whether it is better for government to rebut conspiracy theories or to ignore them, are explored in this light.
The pdf:
https://deliverypdf.ssrn.com/delivery.ph...INDEX=TRUE
|
|
|
Damnable research fraud - AI is making it even worse |
Posted by: Maxmars - 02-18-2024, 10:39 PM - Forum: Science & Technology
- Replies (2)
|
|
I offer a pair of content sources here... Both expound on the massively growing research fraud cases in the global scientific community. The first is a seven- or eight-minute video which treats the subject with some clarity.
Alarming: Fraud spreads in Science -- and I fear it will become worse
(with my apologies for the embedded advertisement - it's brief enough though)
In the video, hostess Sabine Hossenfelder explains that the enormous explosion in the number of published research papers being retracted after seem to share a few commonalities which don't speak well of the people who are responsible for reviewing scientific research... meaning many may have been bribed into authorizing papers for publication. Further, the insipid practice of off-loading the burden of review to 'third party' contracted 'editors' made it possible for the fraud to be carried out without any consequences for the perpetrators.
Also, artificial intelligence tools are used to generate repurposed data manipulated to "pass initial muster" which creates career benefits for any scientist willing to pay money to claim the 'credit' they ostensibly receive from having "published." Sometimes it is potentially detectable because AI is still clumsy at 'rewording' things - and some examples are shared (like rewording breast cancer into "bosom peril" or kidney failure into "renal disappointment, et. al.)
She also explained how, up until recently, the bulk of the fraud seemed to be coming from the eastern hemisphere, and eastern Europe. Apparently, the publishing firm Wiley's subsidiary named Hindawi is a volume producer of these kinds of fraudulent papers.
Second on my list, is an article from the Royal Chemistry Societies online reporting in Chemistry World, which focuses on China's extraordinary situation...,
China conducts nationwide audit of research misconduct after thousands of papers retracted last year
...
China has the highest retraction rate globally, including conference papers, exceeding 20 per 10,000 articles. Hindawi, a subsidiary of Wiley, retracted over 8000 articles involving a Chinese co-author in 2023, a record-breaking year for retractions that resulted in Wiley announcing that it would stop using the Hindawi brand and fold the journals into the rest of its portfolio.\
...
The Chinese government is worried that the high number of retractions is damaging its academic reputation. In 2022, China was the world leader in scientific research output and ‘high impact’ studies, accounting for 23.4% of the world’s research output, according to a report published by Japan’s science and technology ministry. However, analysis conducted by Nature revealed that there were almost 17,000 retraction notices on papers with China-affiliated authors since January 2021.
...
We need to be concerned. Scientific integrity has suffered a lot of damage in the past years... and this stuff isn't helping one bit. Many of these papers are being cited in current research... how exactly, I can't imagine, given that they are practically fiction... but somehow researchers (even the legitimate ones) don't seem to see it until it's too late.
|
|
|
Analysis and execution (a multipart tale) |
Posted by: Maxmars - 02-18-2024, 02:22 PM - Forum: Short Stories
- Replies (4)
|
|
"Slobin Threshwater... what the heck kind of name is that?" He said, looking over the sheet of paper in his hand. Tim had never done this before and was uncertain how important this detail was.
"It's yours, ... be grateful I didn't choose something like Haxxen Paxxen" she said, frowning at him. Tabby was new to "introducing" people to role-playing games and hadn't foreseen the eventuality of people being resistant to the framework.
"Why can't I just use my own name?" Tim asked.
"Because your name sucks!" Joshua interjected to a smattering of chuckles... even Tim chuckled at that.
Tabby proceeded, "Look Tim..., the entire point of this is for you to experience 'being someone else' within the context of a story that is entirely not in your control... it's called "roleplaying", and it can be a lot of fun... with the right story." She became concerned that she couldn't actually pull this off with a newcomer.
"And the right storyteller," added Joshua.
Joshua then said, "Think of it as acting or pretending." He quickly added, "Haxxen Paxxen? What is that? ... Dutch, Swedish maybe?" he then quickly added using an over-the-top pronunciation, "Haxxen Paxxen!" with a strong affectation of an American mimicking a Northern European accent.
Gable, who almost never spoke in the 'set-up' stages of a 'session' said, "I think I've heard 'Haxxen Paxxen' before... but I can't place it... maybe it's mythological?"
"Enough." Tabby said, eager to get to the actual gaming part of the exercise. "Now Tim, understand that you don't have to call yourself by that name... as in real life you could make something else of it... like how I'm Tabitha, but I encourage people to call me Tabby, or how Gable is actually a nickname for Gabriel."
Joshua said, "Yeah, we can just call you "Slob." Tim flashed the "I am not amused" face back at him, while Gable and Jules chortled.
Tabby defused the exchange... "How about we just refer to you as "Bin?" Which she hoped ended the faux contention.
Jules, ever the diplomat, segued into "A rose is a rose by any other name;" ... "What matters is that you will decide what Bin does during the story."
"Within reason." said Tabby. Simultaneously, Josh and Jules both gestured to towards Tabby, as Josh said, "Meet reason."
Tim tried to hide hesitancy, (or so he thought.) He had been acquainted with roleplaying in the real world, where many chose to characterize it as a relatively "childish" exercise, enjoined mostly by prepubescent basement dwellers, or insane young adults - an escapist activity much like comic books and binge drinking. Nerd stuff.
He had been quite surprised to learn that most of the people in the analysis group indulged in roleplaying together, sometimes multiple times a week. He was interested in understanding why.
The thing that sparked his interest was an exchange he witnessed between Tabitha and Logan. He could have sworn that Logan was angry with Tabitha. Tim observed that Logan was brooding over something, and speculated it was a personal friction between him and Tabby. Tim hadn't heard many words exchanged, only sensed Logan's unease. But he soon realized that the apparent friction was entirely theoretical... "You were not in character, and when that happens, I will always impose consequences..." Tabby had said. "How so?" Logan asked. "How so what? Being out of character, or consequences?" Tabby responded. The remainder of the conversation was lost to Tim, he did not want to engage in unwelcome eavesdropping. He later learned that Tabby and Logan would have jumped at the chance to explain the matter to him.
During a brief casual encounter at work, he had spoken of roleplaying with Gabriel, a relatively senior supervisor within the group. Gabriel had explained that many years ago, several intelligence agencies had "discovered" that roleplaying could be an extremely valuable exercise for the analytically inclined. That it could be used for military planning, as well as legal analysis... it was a valuable tool, as well as an effective way to enhance teamwork and security functionality. Gabe said that once he began to explore it, he came to appreciate all the ways it was useful, even including on-the-job relationship development. And he discovered that he enjoyed it personally. Gabriel said, "I learned that the multiplication of minds leads to greater outcomes... with the added benefit of great fun... better than movies or TV, and often even better than books." He, alone among his peers, embraced the exercise.
So here is Tim, learning to 'roleplay' and realizing that it was not, by any means a simple escape, nor a trivial undertaking. He learned that a significant investment of research was required. He soon understood that there was a subtle art at play here.
How this encounter arose, was a surprising development to Tim. While the group was pondering the particulars of an analysis problem, so many instances of the group members referring to a fictional encounter to flesh out the discussion occurred that Tim found himself nearly jealous that he was 'missing' something that was informing the session. But the result of the discussion was a novel approach to the analysis... and one which proved to be not only effective, but impressive to the leadership. Apparently, this group had achieved this success before, so well, and so many times, that they had established a reputation for unravelling mysteries that others seemed incapable of doing. Tim decided he wanted in.
[stay tuned for part 2]
|
|
|
Hi. I made it here at last. |
Posted by: Nerb - 02-18-2024, 01:02 PM - Forum: Introductions
- Replies (8)
|
|
Hi folks, just a quick intro to say hello and it's nice to be here.
Not sure what to expect or what I may be able to bring to the party but we'll see.
btw..thanks to those who started this place.
|
|
|
Let's do it again... Another pandemic anyone? |
Posted by: Maxmars - 02-17-2024, 07:38 PM - Forum: General Conspiracies
- Replies (6)
|
|
With no apologies, I offer this thread here in the "Conspiracies" Forum... even though it is currently a "recent event" and frankly a "pandemic" topic.
From recent FOX News reporting:
WHO chief's dire warning: Disease X outbreak 'a matter of when, not if'
[excerpted]...
World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General Tedros Ghebreyesus has issued a new warning about the likelihood of Disease X breaking out, telling global world leaders it is "a matter of when, not if" a new pathogen and pandemic will strike.
Tedros, who goes by his first name, told attendees at the World Government Summit in Dubai earlier his week he gave a similar warning in 2018 that a pandemic was likely to hit, and he was proven right with the outbreak of the deadly coronavirus.
Complaining that the world is still ill-prepared for a new pandemic, Tedros once again touted the urgent need for a global treaty to be agreed upon by May and dismissed suspicions of it being a WHO power grab as outlandish...
[Bolding is my highlight]
Given our recent history with globalist-driven healthcare "plans" ... and recognizing the immense wealth transfer the "plan" engendered, I think it's fair to look upon this 'declaration' with extreme trepidation and foreboding. Clearly the last bit about having "called it" last time shows more or less interesting "narrative shifting." Gone is the "Who knew?" cue card for media abuse... now comes the "remember when?" card. It couldn't be less convincing.
As for the statement fragment - "a matter of when, not if" a new pathogen and pandemic will strike." is equally alarming... considering that that state of affairs has been true since the dawn of social man. It is ALWAYS a matter of "when not if" for a lot of things... and people warn about those all the time too. The WHO representative is not by any stretch of the imagination the first to say "this is coming" ... and reputedly, some pharmaceutical "prognostications" were squarely on the mark about the pandemic - almost as if they were "in on something" which begs inquiry.
As for this tidbit:
"Let me be clear: WHO did not impose anything on anyone during the COVID-19 pandemic. Not lockdowns, not mask mandates, not vaccine mandates.
"We don’t have the power to do that, we don’t want it and we’re not trying to get it."
Clearly, he never saw or knew of the immeasurable amount of "according to the WHO" and "WHO guidance informs our policies" we were subjected to, while being misdirect, socially manipulated, and subjected to the "hard sell." The hell they didn't "impose" anything? Multiple masks, anyone, "vaccine or unemployment" anyone, "If you're unvaccinated you are a dirty bad person who wishes harm upon the world...," sound familiar?
So if this is a conspiracy in action, as I would like explored, might we now openly recognize that it's high time to pay the piper?
|
|
|
The Truth Will Set You{r Soul) Free |
Posted by: TheRedneck - 02-17-2024, 10:46 AM - Forum: Diseases & Pandemics
- Replies (3)
|
|
This was posted by me a little while back over at Rogue Nation. With permission, I am posting it here as well to maximize exposure. I know the conclusions will likely not sit well with everyone, but I think it is information that needs to be exposed.
Original post: https://rogue-nation.com/mybb/showthread.php?tid=1747
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I know I've been sort of AWOL from this board (or any boards for that matter) for a while. To be honest, I've just been so disgusted with humanity in general that it felt useless to say anything. But, this damn brain of mine simply cannot stop running (birth defect) and a week or so ago I managed to out together some clues to what is going on behind the scenes.
I speak of the planned-demic that affected the world in 2020 and 2021.
The whole thing never made sense to me. A virus from Wuhan China got loose and caused a major panic in that area. China shut down all domestic flights into and out of Wuhan... but not International flights! Entire families were being devastated while Chinese authorities took drastic, draconian actions against them to deny medical treatment.
Then, of course the virus, which turned out to be extremely contagious, got loose across the globe. World leaders scrambled to get it back under control. The media was reporting it like we were experiencing the Black Plague v2.0. Yet, the actual fatality rates were fairly low... a little higher than the common flu, but certainly nothing to compare with the Bubonic plague or Ebola... or even the Spanish flu. In response to this "unprecedented" emergency, schools were shut down... churches were forbidden to operate... small businesses were forced to close... people were denied health care... families were forced apart, unable to even attend a funeral for their deceased loved ones... we in the USA literally ripped the very fabric of society asunder.
The methodology to contain and treat this disaster was more of a disaster than the disaster. Andrew Cuomo, in the midst of a general panic over a highly contagious and supposedly incurable and fatal outbreak, forced nursing homes to take in known contagious cases by law! The vast bulk of the early deaths attributable were from nursing home outbreaks, many instigated directly by the same governments that were crying to help. Cuomo even, after requesting a naval medical ship and getting it, abused the resource. The naval ship was never intended to treat Chinese virus cases; it was to treat other cases so the NY medical system could focus on the virus. But Cuomo intentionally sent known virus cases to the naval ship, despite full knowledge that the ship couldn't offer containment.
That's homicide... no argument can be made to hold water against that statement. Andrew Cuomo is the most prolific mass murderer in US history.
Several things were tried with approval by the various governments in the USA. There was social distancing... which led to building occupancy rates being sharply curtailed to the point that employees were required to maintain a running count of customers in the stores, a daunting task that used so much manpower that smaller stores had to simply close up shop. That concentrated all public shopping into the larger retailers, further fueling congestion at the stores. Now we had long lines waiting to enter a store, sometimes for hours, outside and unprotected from the elements in close proximity to each other, just so they could "social distance" for a few minutes once it was their turn to enter. We tried face masks, my personal pet peeve, which aggravated asthma cases and COPD cases, weakening the immunity of people affected. It also served as a mobile petri dish... people would remove these masks, full of exhaled pathogens, across parking lots, littering the ground with something that, were common sense be used, should have been treated as hazardous medical waste. The result was further exposure to the general public. We tried mandatory quarantine for those who tested positive... not in a controlled facility, but at their home. This meant that anyone required to get a test would spend all their time up to the testing date in town buying supplies to last two weeks... busily contaminating as many people as possible. It also meant that people were loath to even take the test, since the penalty for failing it was so high, leading to who knows how many un-diagnosed cases escaping notice.
At the same time, doctors across the globe were experimenting with different medications to try and somehow save their patients. Hydroxychloroquine was an early medicine that showed promise as part of a cocktail which also included high levels of zinc and vitamin C. Field reports were that it showed success if the disease was caught early. But the CDC then tested it, using hydroxychloroquine alone without the rest of the cocktail, on patients in advanced cases, and summarily determined that it was not just ineffective, but actually dangerous! This despite hydroxychloroquine having a record of safe usage among most patients for 40 years. Eventually it was actually outlawed to treat the virus!
Remdesivir was another drug which showed early promise... but it was similarly attacked. Monoclonal antibodies were developed that indeed did help control the virus, but then their availability was curtailed in states which were using them. Why? Something to do with racism if I remember right. We all know that's just a dog whistle general excuse.
Instead, we got a vaccine... unproven technology (although it is now proven to work), rushed through trials, the ingredients hidden behind excuses of too much information to divulge, with blanket legal immunity to the companies that made it, and immediately purchased en masse by the US government. Those purchases were used to provide free vaccinations to as many people as possible. Initial offerings were limited to certain groups, but ask any marketing expert: that is a sure way to create interest among others. As stockpiles filled up, it was released for the general public... then attempts were made to force it onto the general public. Social media was crawling with pleas to please, please, get the vaccine, if not for yourself, then think of Grandma! But that flew in the face of reality... if a vaccine protects the vaccinated, then the only people at risk from the unvaccinated are the unvaccinated!
Many companies required vaccination as a condition of employment. Others offered to drop the face mask requirements for the vaccinated. The military made it a mandate, government programs started talking about mandating it for the retired and disabled, and Biden actually attempted to make it a mandate for the general public.
Notice that while all this is going on, we're still no closer to a treatment... just a vaccine.
Then reports start coming in of people having adverse reactions to the vaccine. They're minimized in the media. They're ridiculed in social media. People fully vaccinated begin to contract the virus in large numbers, in direct opposition to the promises made. The CDC responds by literally changing their definition of a vaccine. Then cases come to light of the vaccinated being hospitalized with the virus, and even dying from the virus. And still, the media downplays the reports and social media laughs at them.
Turns out, the spike protein used to develop immunity is the main problem with the virus! But it only becomes a major problem in the bloodstream, not the lungs. The virus affects the lungs primarily, only entering the bloodstream when the lungs are bleeding, often helped by ventilators. The vaccinations go directly into the bloodstream.
I watched all this unfold before my eyes, trying desperately to understand: WHY? what could the end goal be? Depopulation? Obviously not, because it wasn't working nearly as effective as other methods. A rights grab? I thought that might be feasible for a while, but things have somewhat returned to normal on that front and that's a lot of work to go through when we have been slowly losing our rights anyway. It didn't affect the 2nd Amendment. Maybe to remove a sitting President? OK, but why was it global?
Then i figured it out.
I have long said that when the actions of politicians make no sense in achieving their goal, they are lying about their goal. Politicians are not stupid... they are able to convince over 50% of the voters to vote for them while actively stealing from them. They are good at acting stupid. So if one can figure out what goal is best served by the totality of the actions taken, one has determined the actual goal.
It's not depopulation per se... it's population control.
For many years we have seen the effects of planned obsolescence. Products are literally designed to break as soon as the warranty is out, so more products can be sold. I believe tat is the purpose of both the virus and the vaccine. We know that politicians have been warning us about the insolvency of Social Security, but what they aren't keen on saying is the Social Security is not now, nor has it ever been, insolvent. Nor is it expected to e insolvent in the foreseeable future. It is broke only because the trust fund is full of IOUs from the US Congress, IOUs that were never intended to be repaid. As the amount of liquidity on the Social Security trust fund declines, so does the ability to continue raiding it and, heaven forbid, continue not repaying all that money "borrowed" over the years.
We just saw a major increase in retirement age, along with increases in amount paid into Social Security. Too many of those too soon, and people will become unruly and ask embarrassing questions. So a different approach is needed: kill off the older people, aka the "useless eaters," and simultaneously lower the expected life span of everyone else. The virus/vaccine does that exactly: the elderly generally have weakened immunity to any virus, and the fact that the vaccine can cause heart issues is now a scientific given. The virus was released to cause a panic while eliminating a portion of the elderly, which was then used to drum up public acceptance for the vaccine, which in turn reduces the lifespan of most of the vaccinated. That's why it was quickly distributed to retirement communities; that's why it was aided in spreading by all the "precautions"; that's why the vaccine was pushed so hard.
It also explains the global phenomenon... most countries have some sort of public retirement system, and most of them are experiencing similar problems to those in the USA. All would love to get their hands on that retirement money.
The sad part is, what's now done is now done. Once that vaccine does damage, there's no known way to correct it. The only silver lining I can see is that it doesn't seem to work its voodoo equally... some will die early (already have), some will simply see a shorter lifespan, and some will likely escape without any major consequences. No one know what category they will fall into on that. It's all in the roll of the dice now.
And I'm crawling back into my comfy little hole under the nice rock. Do with this revelation as you will.
TheRedneck
|
|
|
Oak Ridge, the Secret City |
Posted by: BeTheGoddess - 02-17-2024, 08:25 AM - Forum: Area 51 & Other Facilities
- Replies (5)
|
|
Welcome to Oak Ridge, I will be your tour guide for today...
Quote:n 1942,[sup][12][/sup] the United States federal government forcibly purchased nearly 60,000 acres (240 km[sup]2[/sup]) of farmland in the Clinch River Valley for the development of a planned city supporting 75,000 residents.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oak_Ridge,_Tennessee
The secret city was to work on not just atomic energy science, but also to develop computer systems capable of runnin atomic testing in virtual environments. You've heard of the computer company ORACLE?
Quote:The ORACLE or Oak Ridge Automatic Computer and Logical Engine,[sup][1][/sup] an early computer built by Oak Ridge National Laboratory, was based on the IAS architecture developed by John von Neumann.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ORACLE_(computer)
Quote:The name also drew from the 1977 CIA project codename, which was also Oracle's first customer.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oracle_Corporation
One of the projects they were developing, to my knowledge was a project called "google", but I'm finding it hard to get a decent source on that.
Anyway, Oak Ridge is one of those places some try pretend doesnt exist.
If you're from the area or been there let us know.
|
|
|
Secession Trend Up? |
Posted by: Kenzo - 02-17-2024, 05:13 AM - Forum: Current Events
- Replies (24)
|
|
What was the poll results earlyer , like 10-20 years ago ? Is the trend that more people want secession now than earlyer ?
Quote:Around one in four Americans say they would support their state seceding — ranging from 9% in Connecticut to 36% in Alaska, among 46 states analyzed.
From California to Texas to New Hampshire, calls for state secession have made headlines recently, sparking debates over whether states have a right to secede. We asked over 35,000 U.S. adults to tell us their views on secession.
Besides the overall finding of significant support for secession, the poll found that Republicans are more likely than Democrats to support their state seceding, regardless of whether they live in a primarily Republican or Democratic state. Larger and more populated states — including California, Texas, and New York — are more likely than smaller and less populous states to have a higher share of residents who favor secession. Most Americans who are in favor of their state seceding believe that doing so is a constitutional right, while most who oppose it believe this right does not exist.
The states whose residents are most likely to support secession: Alaska, Texas, and California
The division/ disagreement is larger 2024 than like 1960-1980 , notably larger ...
Not sure do i interpret this right, but the poll is not just about secession ....people vote yes because they think the other side or party is not aligned enough with their own views , republican or democrat .
It is my personal view that Russia has been part of secession movements , i dont have evidense...just gut feeling. And i also think Russia has been influencing ideologically US decades ....So maybe something worth to at least consider ? You have people allready in High positions that are linked with Russia....Donald Trump, Mike Johnson etc...
US secession is a great idea — for Russia
|
|
|
Good habits: Holding hands (especially with a loved one) |
Posted by: Maxmars - 02-16-2024, 02:23 PM - Forum: Psychology, Philosophy & Metaphysics
- Replies (13)
|
|
If you want to help someone in distress, offer affirmation of your bond, enhance your connection to them, or even just show good will... touch them. You will likely both benefit from the contact.
I came across an excellent article published in the Washington Post, which had particular meaning to me (but I'll get to that later.) The article was in the "Advice" category, authored by Trisha Pasricha, MD entitled:
The remarkable power of holding hands with someone you love
[excerpts]
Studies show that holding hands can reduce pain and buffer stressful experiences. But its impact on brain activity suggests something more profound is going on.
Holding hands exerts striking effects on our emotional state, especially when it’s with a romantic partner: It can help lower blood pressure, reduce pain and buffer stressful experiences.
...
But the research also suggests something far more profound about our need for connection.
“If you really understand hand-holding — what it is and how it has its effects — you begin to understand just about every single facet of what it is to be a human being,” said James Coan, a clinical psychologist and director of the Virginia Affective Neuroscience Laboratory at the University of Virginia. “It expresses all the things that we are for each other.”
...
According to Coan, the findings suggest that holding hands actually helps the brain offload the work of confronting stress. So when you reach out to hold a loved one’s hand in a difficult time, it’s like you’re sharing the burden with them.
...
Coan hypothesized that holding the hand of someone close to them would cause an increase in activity in the prefrontal cortex as the participant relaxed and felt more secure. With more activity in the prefrontal cortex, he thought, less emotional activity — like those involved in fear or anxiety — would occur elsewhere in the brain.
But that’s not what happened.
When couples held hands, Coan did observe a decrease in all the emotional regions of the brain as he had expected. However, in experiment after experiment, there was no associated increase in prefrontal cortex activity — instead, there was a decrease.
What was going on?
At first, Coan couldn’t account for what part of the brain was responsible for the participants’ stress relief when they held hands. It was as if people were getting snacks out of the vending machine without paying any money.
Finally, he arrived at a new conclusion: What if he had gotten the baseline and experimental states backward? Maybe the brain didn’t perceive holding hands as something new he was adding to a baseline of being alone. What if our neuropsychological baseline was feeling connected to someone? Perhaps feeling alone was the deviation all along — one that would require the metabolically expensive activation of our prefrontal cortex to cope.
“To the human brain, the world presents a series of problems to solve,” Coan said. “And it turns out being alone is a problem.”
He called this phenomenon social baseline theory: It’s the idea that the human brain expects access to relationships and interdependence because without them, the world’s problems are mammoth and we need to expend so much more physiological and psychological effort. But when we know we’re not alone — as is conveyed through holding hands — it’s as if we can access snacks freely with no vending machine at all.
...
Don’t be afraid to offer a hand to someone who is struggling — we’re clearly wired for it.
Perhaps I am being presumptuous when I state that this all seems naturally logical to me. But sometimes life kind of 'highlights' little things for you to observe... in my case, my recent loss. When my wife recently passed there were many things that were made clear to me through the ol' "things I've taken for granted" angle of introspection. I loved holding her hand. I miss holding hands with my wife. I loved waking up to find that as we slept, we held hands. Dang it ... (now you know the reason I put off this little portion of the thread until the end.)
Enough of that!
I found in my research that many different research papers have been written on the effects of touch, the various cultural taboos proscribing contact, and even the results of "touch starvation." It's quite the subject... but ultimately, I would strongly suggest holding hands with your loved ones (where appropriate and welcomed.)
|
|
|
I must expound upon the state of society and the trajectory it presently pursues. |
Posted by: TheCustodian - 02-16-2024, 02:07 PM - Forum: Rant
- Replies (13)
|
|
Regrettably, it appears that a considerable segment of the populace remains ensconced in a state of intellectual delusion, buoyed by the illusion of erudition bestowed upon them by facile access to information, contingent upon the functionality of certain systems. This facile access to knowledge does not beget wisdom. Furthermore, it is disheartening to witness the lamentable lack of focus pervasive among many individuals. Rather than engaging in the profound contemplation afforded by literature, they prefer the fleeting gratification of 30 second video clips. It is plausible that this predilection stems from an inability to sustain attention for the duration required to peruse even a solitary page.
Moreover, an acute self-absorption pervades contemporary society, wherein concerns for the collective welfare and the preservation of the future are eclipsed by the relentless pursuit of transient amusement. The pernicious ramifications of this societal trend upon humanity are grave indeed, yet regrettably, the majority remains oblivious to its deleterious effects. Those who discern the encroaching peril seem woefully indifferent, bereft of the requisite fortitude to effect meaningful change.
In light of these observations, I find myself consumed by an ineffable sense of frustration. This is not the world I once knew; it has undergone a lamentable metamorphosis, leaving me disheartened and profoundly unsettled.
|
|
|
The Legend of Shin Au Avi |
Posted by: lostbook - 02-16-2024, 02:25 AM - Forum: Ancient & Lost Civilizations
- Replies (2)
|
|
Quote:According to History Daily, a local tribe known as the Paiute has been repeating legends of an underground city in Death Valley "for centuries." The city is called Shin-Au-Av, or something approximating "Ghost Land" in English, and supposedly it's a portal to the underworld. Further, the tribe even has an origin story for how the city was founded.
Legend is one thing, reality is another, and at various points in the 20th century, if secondhand accounts of various settlers and explorers are to be believed, more than one person found evidence of tunnels and other human activity underneath Death Valley. For example, according to History Daily, in 1931 Dr. F. Bruce Russell and his friend, Dr. Daniel S. Bovee, found underground catacombs while trying to dig a mine shaft. The men purportedly found the mummified remains of 8-foot-tall men wearing leather not from any known animal, as well as strange carvings on the rocks.
Has anyone heard of Shin Au Avi; a supposed underground city in Death Valley according to Paiute Indian Tribes? There haven't been any attempts to find it since some initial findings/ discoveries back in the 1930's. For now this city remains a Paiute legend about a place which leads to the Land of the Dead. I would like to see if this place really exists.
The Truth About Shin-Au-Av, The Legendary Underground City In Death Valley (grunge.com)
|
|
|
Student indoctrination: CBDC - get hyped! |
Posted by: Maxmars - 02-15-2024, 11:50 PM - Forum: New World Order
- Replies (16)
|
|
It always worries me when I hear about students being subjected to "embrace" something 'commercial.'
And while this alleged "indoctrination" is taking place in Europe, I can't imagine we won't see the same thing here in the States eventually.
My source is an article entitled: The CBDC Indoctrination Has Begun
In summary it describes something interesting happening in high schools, at least in Spain thus far.
Excerpted:
...
"Yesterday a close friend of mine who lives in Spain told me that his son, a high school senior, has been getting lessons in school about Central Bank Digital Currencies, or CBDCs.
If you’re not familiar with the concept, a CBDC is essentially a cryptocurrency that is controlled by the government and central bank.
...
But CBDCs take this power to a much higher level… because there’s no more middleman. Government authorities wouldn’t have to bother going to banks, brokerages, and credit card companies; they could simply deactivate your funds with a mouse click.
...
Now, even though only a handful of CBDCs have been rolled out around the world, there are over 100 central banks that are developing their own CBDCs. And that includes both the United States and the European Union.
...
My friend’s son (again, a high school senior in Spain) explained that his teachers are absolutely gushing over the idea of CBDCs...
...
The teachers expressed utter joy about this, and the curriculum seems designed to get the kids excited about it too..."
Perhaps needless to say, I feel that the entire exercise of CBDC's is a "dream come true" for any cabal, or wayward government, pursuing the ultimate goal of totally subjugating a population. It would be a lynchpin of any nascent NWO. In fact, it seems to be the stuff of 'end game' moves, expressly because there is no way the intervene should their agencies decide to 'punish' anyone at anytime, anywhere.
So yeah, maybe I'm being too untrusting, and I should adhere to the commonly held notion of "they'd never do that." But still, I prefer a world where they can't do it at all, not one where they could do it - but we trust them not to.
I suspect that if you wanted to create an indoctrination scenario, high school might the best place to do it - after all most high school students think they know everything and are never wrong.
I have to wonder if they are going to try it with younger students in the US ... since that's where "influencer" educators operate with the least effective oversight? Look for it at schools near you...
|
|
|
Handwriting's on the wall |
Posted by: Maxmars - 02-15-2024, 04:28 PM - Forum: Psychology, Philosophy & Metaphysics
- Replies (12)
|
|
[Here something I ran across earlier... I hesitated because I recalled an old haunt where I would have categorized this as an "education" topic.
But since it was originally reported in as a psychology topic I will place it here]
This is about the act of handwriting... as in, writing by hand.
The original source of this is a research paper entitled:
Handwriting but not typewriting leads to widespread brain connectivity
(Although it spawned an article in the Epoch Times and was also "aggregated" by Zero Hedge.)
As traditional handwriting is progressively being replaced by digital devices, it is essential to investigate the implications for the human brain. Brain electrical activity was recorded in 36 university students as they were handwriting visually presented words using a digital pen and typewriting the words on a keyboard. Connectivity analyses were performed on EEG data recorded with a 256-channel sensor array. When writing by hand, brain connectivity patterns were far more elaborate than when typewriting on a keyboard, as shown by widespread theta/alpha connectivity coherence patterns between network hubs and nodes in parietal and central brain regions. Existing literature indicates that connectivity patterns in these brain areas and at such frequencies are crucial for memory formation and for encoding new information and, therefore, are beneficial for learning....
We urge that children, from an early age, must be exposed to handwriting activities in school to establish the neuronal connectivity patterns that provide the brain with optimal conditions for learning...
Now I know I may be preaching to the choir, as one who feels that the act of writing can be a fulfilling exercise; it bears noting that there is at least some evidence that the practice has scientifically verifiable benefits... especially to developing brains.
I was wondering about our extended families (people we know, friends, their children, etc.)
I have yet to find any kids in my area who don't know how to write... but are we in danger of that? Is that something, in this world of forms and submitted paperwork, that people are coming to the point of NOT being able to do unless it's online? It's seems possible now that you can dictate whatever you like verbally and have it appear as if you wrote it... but are we really there?
|
|
|
Individual Protection Against Atomic Attack (1957) |
Posted by: theshadowknows - 02-15-2024, 12:33 PM - Forum: Survival
- Replies (2)
|
|
Quote:A documentary film currently in use for training soldiers against possible nuclear warfare. Part of this training is to familiarize soldiers with actual atomic detonations, showing them the damage such weapons can inflict, and teaching them the most effective methods of defense against atomic attack. There is no minimizing the potency of the nuclear weapon. But today's soldier, well informed and well trained in test blasts over the last few years, has a better chance of survival on the nuclear battlefield. Many of the methods employed by the Army in the training of its soldiers are equally applicable to the citizens of this nation in the event of atomic attack. Although the battleground of the future may well be a nuclear one and the nuclear weapon is perhaps the greatest challenge to the foot soldier in military history, the United States Army believes it is a challenge that can be met, and that today's soldier has a chance of surviving this new weapon just as the soldier of the past was able to survive the weapons of his day.
|
|
|
US National Security Threat: Is this about one thing, or the other? |
Posted by: Maxmars - 02-14-2024, 02:55 PM - Forum: Current Events
- Replies (1)
|
|
I recently came across a few articles regarding what was called, by the House Intelligence Committee Chairman, a "serious national security threat."
Mind you, I am generally uninterested in "political theater," and this might well be just that. However, on the off chance that the alarm is sincere and not another "tool" to promote "appearances," I wonder if anyone might feel compelled to comment and expand my understanding about some of this potential "news."
The reporting tells us that:
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Turner is urging President Biden to declassify information related to a "serious national security threat."
"Today, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence has made available to all Members of Congress information concerning a serious national security threat," Turner, R-Ohio, said in a statement Wednesday.
"I am requesting that President Biden declassify all information relating to this threat so that Congress, the Administration, and our allies can openly discuss the actions necessary to respond to this threat," he added.
Source: Fox News
The reporter notes a coincidental piece of evidence they obtained; namely a "notice" which had been distributed to members of congress on Wednesday (Jan 31st?,) which suggested "an urgent matter with regard to a destabilizing foreign military capability that should be known by all Congressional Policy Makers."
My first intruding thought was... "wait... that little tidbit sat unreported for a week?" It seems to me that the whole "urgent matter" was not reported until the Chair of the Intelligence Committee cried "Yo! We can't ignore this!" Is that right? And he received it a week ago too. And evidently recognized its apparent magnitude.
The National Security Advisor acknowledged, and apparently executed a personal briefing for the Committee Chairmen the very next day ... which must have been alarming enough justify this 'open call' request to the administration.
We could go all over the place with this since the 'cherry on top' phrase is "a destabilizing foreign military capability" which might be meant to deter inference about exactly whose "destabilizing capability" he is concerned with, (let alone exactly what capability we are talking about.)
All in all, objectively speaking this is fear fodder. Whether true or not, sounding alarm like this is supposed to present only when real threats are on the horizon, otherwise... what can it be....
Another one of his over-the-top promotions for foreign military aid? (insert, the obligatory O'Jays tune herein)
In essence my question is this:
Would you bet that this purely A) political theatrics, or is it really a B) national threat?
Please indulge me, I know the purist answer is "yes" without specifying which...
but I wonder if this has political value alone, or is it true (prima facia, so to speak.)
(Also, can we expect to ever learn the truth either way, I wonder?)
|
|
|
|