(03-18-2025, 02:18 PM)FlyersFan Wrote: Our tax money will not be spent on waste, fraud and abuse like drag queen shows in Ireland and trans porn comics in Peru.
How many billions do you think Irish drag queen shows or Peruvian trans porn comics cost?
Quote:Our taxes wont go down, but what the taxes get spent on will not be so ignorant.
Wait, what? This whole 'efficiency drive' will have no effect on the bottom line of what US taxpayers will pay? That doesn't actually sound like governmental efficiency at all.
Quote:Not wasting tax money is a good thing. The amount of blowback against common sense cuts to waste fraud and abuse is really strange.
So lets look at this rationally.
Lets say that DOGE claims it has cut more than 100,000 federal workers jobs. At an average of $106,462 per year, that represents a potential saving of $10,646,200,000.
So the taxpayers were paying Federal Taxes for the running of the Federal government. And their money will still be collected at the same rate, despite savings.
And then there's also the question of where these alleged savings are going to go. If the taxpayers aren't seeing them, and the government departments aren't seeing the money, where is it that all those billions in tax money is going to go?
All the government departments have always historically vied for their slice of the Federal budget pie, and in turn they do their own mini budgets to do their jobs and to distribute their cut of pie to wherever they deem it to be useful. That is, these guys are really just bean-counters. That is their whole job, and a big part of their bean-counting work is to audit and account the process, in real dollar figures.
There is almost never ever any excess in budget to be spent on things that there isn't a good reason for. And now, the bean-counters are massively understaffed, so it becomes even more likely that money could be misspent, even more than before, because a lot of those who weren't 'efficient' were actually the ones who were auditing the process, and more of those doing the auditing will be moved into budget allocation roles instead. And what happens when some of these savvy people realize that no-one is looking and they won't ever get caught if they put their hand in the 'till?
Then we look at the way the cuts have been made. Willy-nilly and without adequate analysis. So, at a greater cost to the department, there will have to be re-hires, probably at around a 20+% wage hike, to lure them back.
Some initial estimates have suggested that 90% of those roles that DOGE has eliminated, will need to be refilled, and probably at the higher rate that they were offering re-hires.
($10,646,200,000 x 1.2 x 0.9 = $11,497,896,000)
This will actually cost $851,696,000.00
more than what was originally being paid for those 100,000 workers! Such efficient!