DI Wiki Epstein Archive ATS Archive PDF Archive North Korean TV
 

Trump Speech Prediction Game
#91
(Yesterday, 02:08 PM)marshun Wrote: the Biden win gave the Democrats four years to bury and shred everything.
anyone with half a brain would know to get rid of the evidence.



Yes, of course......carry on.  Delusional.
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope.  Nothing...
#92
(07-17-2026, 07:53 PM)IdeomotorPrisoner Wrote: So... A strawman to sidestep and talk about The Save America Act. Okay!

What terrifies me most is you believe that without a shred of doubt.  

Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Mississippi, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Tennessee, and Wisconsin

These are states that required photo IDs in 2024. Democrats won SEVERAL contested  congressional districts in those states.  

Competitive districts in Georgia (#2), Ohio (#9), North Carolina (#1) were all won by the democrats in HIGHLY CONTESTED races. 
 


so if Dems can win with photo ID why are they so against it?
#93
(Yesterday, 02:08 PM)marshun Wrote: the Biden win gave the Democrats four years to bury and shred everything.
anyone with half a brain would know to get rid of the evidence.



62 law suits challenging the 2020 election result, all tossed for no evidence.

And they were not four years after, so, no.
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope.  Nothing...
#94
(Yesterday, 02:37 PM)Oldcarpy2 Wrote: 62 law suits challenging the 2020 election result, all tossed for no evidence.

And they were not four years after, so, no.

So you ignore evidence now?
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
#95
(9 hours ago)DBCowboy Wrote: So you ignore evidence now?

What evidence? There wasn't any evidence. Hearsay isn't evidence.

They recounted the ballots, they tracked down the details of the voters. They verified the document and custody chains. They decompiled the program code. They investigated the specific allegations and the alleged video evidence. They ran statistical analyses. They were thorough and were run by numerous unrelated groups of investigators who all found insufficient evidence.

But they did find a few cases of electoral fraud, none of it sufficient enough to change electoral outcomes, and none of it was organized.

The whole stolen elections rubbish was just another one of Trunb's tens of thousands of lies.

And the 'America First' act is a misnomer, just another "papers please" fascist endeavor. The non-citizens among you, alienated, impoverished and exposed, will become the source of disease in your communities and they will be forced to commit crimes just to live because legitimate income and health services will be denied from them. It will make the USA even more like one of those 'shithole' countries than it is now.

There are already numerous checks on electoral integrity and there are already databases of nationality of US residents (how do you think ICE selects its victims?) and of voting applicability. Adding yet another database and ID doesn't make things any more rigorous and is another 'big government' thing that public money must fund (it definitely won't add to the US economy).
Support the Christchurch Call
#96
(Yesterday, 02:11 PM)marshun Wrote: so if Dems can win with photo ID why are they so against it?

Because it's an expensive waste of effort, predicated upon a lie, used as propaganda to keep a tyrant in power.

There are so many more genuine US citizens, that any tiny percentage of poor and undocumented people could never hope to threaten or overturn the US way of life, economy or political system.

Undocumented immigrants pose no national threat. There are sufficient policing forces to deal with the few criminal ones. They must fly under the radar and so they have no political voice and therefore no way way of gaining political power, and historically, they are on average better behaved than US citizens because they try to remain hidden and unnoticed.
Support the Christchurch Call
#97
(9 hours ago)DBCowboy Wrote: So you ignore evidence now?

He has had 2 years, with majority republicans in charge but has yet to provide any evidence or charges. At some point, even you guys have to say this is BS.
#98
(Yesterday, 02:11 PM)marshun Wrote: so if Dems can win with photo ID why are they so against it?

Well the law does what's intended, but is held back because it (un)intentionally fucks over married women with additional hoops when registering to also have to line up their maiden name.  

So besides immigrants, it targets; Married women and men who change their legal names, and transgender people.  

So discrimination considerations...



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Xi Aims To Overcome 'Thucydides Trap' In Talks With Trump: What It Means govshill2 7 545 05-15-2026, 09:34 PM
Last Post: SteamyAmerican
  Who else thinks Trump's crazy for threatening civilian infrastructure? Solvedit 17 833 04-07-2026, 08:40 PM
Last Post: Encia22
  Supreme Court Nomination by Trump Sky727 7 610 03-04-2026, 08:57 PM
Last Post: argentus
  Trump's defamation suit against the media backfires Kurokage 174 7,265 12-20-2025, 12:33 PM
Last Post: NoCorruptionAllowed
  Putin and Trump's pincer movement on South America as 'troops build up' on border Kurokage 20 1,122 12-07-2025, 11:36 AM
Last Post: Thetruth
  US lawmakers to force vote on war powers if Trump attacks Venezuela Kurokage 7 441 12-04-2025, 12:57 AM
Last Post: Bootless
  Trump says something hit and caused fires pianopraze 12 1,201 01-25-2025, 09:45 PM
Last Post: Byrd
  Trump Strikes The Deep State On Day One Lynyrd Skynyrd 6 922 01-22-2025, 04:05 AM
Last Post: opethNJ
  Trump Wants To Eliminate Daylight Savings Time FlyersFan 13 1,619 12-14-2024, 06:37 PM
Last Post: jaded
  Joe Rogans Trump interview released or leaked? agit8dchop 2 612 10-26-2024, 07:09 AM
Last Post: Maxmars