51 |
4,188 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

(Yesterday, 06:47 PM)IdeomotorPrisoner Wrote: Yes! THAT'S ME! The crying liberal.
My look has more of a blank stare with a little "I cant believe people are okay with this," added on to it. Maybe also, "OMFG, they actually WANT state news. Where's that Ben Franklin liberty quote."
I could have sworn the constitution was important to MAGA. it was like sold at their rallies and worn with pride. Bill of rights decals on trucks and all. The sacred documents of liberty and such..
MAGA were the constitutionalist saving us from tyranny, what happened?
Abdicate reality for a personality cult or something?
This is extremely unconstitutional to even troll.. which it hopefully was.
Response Options:
A: DARVO - Think of a way to use a strawman of something Biden did that was tyrannical to avoid answering whether or not you support Trump pissing all over the constitution.
B - Post Meme that reasserts the previous dismissive/bait response.
The ECL media didn't cover it because it exposed them.
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
109 |
2,732 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

So... A strawman to sidestep and talk about The Save America Act. Okay!
Quote:If you had to show an ID to vote, democrats would lose elections nation-wide.
What terrifies me most is you believe that without a shred of doubt.
Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Mississippi, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Tennessee, and Wisconsin
These are states that required photo IDs in 2024. Democrats won SEVERAL contested congressional districts in those states.
Competitive districts in Georgia (#2), Ohio (#9), North Carolina (#1) were all won by the democrats in HIGHLY CONTESTED races.
Which is why I support the idea of this act, along with 55-75% of America (depending on poll).
I think passing it can help SHOW IT DOESNT CHANGE THE OUTCOME and FINALLY end this bullshit.
Like, "Gee DNC, dont let the undying disdain we all feel help him make his point or anything!!!"
So with that said...
What do you think about Trump going all "state media" and pissing on the constitution over having his speech not ran? Do you think news agencies with persistent political biases against the president should be forced to run "state content?"
I look forward to the answer to this when I return...
* highlight added in lieu of responding..
9 |
2,122 |
| JOINED: |
May 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(Yesterday, 07:53 PM)IdeomotorPrisoner Wrote: So... A strawman to sidestep and talk about The Save America Act. Okay!
What terrifies me most is you believe that without a shred of doubt.
Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Mississippi, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Tennessee, and Wisconsin
These are states that required photo IDs in 2024. Democrats won SEVERAL contested congressional districts in those states.
Competitive districts in Georgia (#2), Ohio (#9), North Carolina (#1) were all won by the democrats in HIGHLY CONTESTED races.
Which is why I support the idea of this act, along with 55-75% of America (depending on poll).
I think passing it can help SHOW IT DOESNT CHANGE THE OUTCOME and FINALLY end this bullshit.
Like, "Gee DNC, dont let the undying disdain we all feel help him make his point or anything!!!"
So with that said...
What do you think about Trump going all "state media" and pissing on the constitution over having his speech not ran? Do you think news agencies with persistent political biases against the president should be forced to run "state content?"
I look forward to the answer to this when I return...
Who cares?
Why are you against voter ID?
51 |
4,188 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

(Yesterday, 07:53 PM)IdeomotorPrisoner Wrote:
What do you think about Trump going all "state media" and pissing on the constitution over having his speech not ran? Do you think news agencies with persistent political biases against the president should be forced to run "state content?"
I look forward to the answer to this when I return...
Does Trump have freedom of speech?
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
9 |
2,122 |
| JOINED: |
May 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(Yesterday, 08:08 PM)DBCowboy Wrote: Does Trump have freedom of speech?

As long as that speech goes along with the deranged Leftist narrative, is my guess.
8 |
1,671 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(Yesterday, 08:08 PM)DBCowboy Wrote: Does Trump have freedom of speech?
No-one appears to have stopped Trump from saying anything he wants.
I'd guess that freedom of speech doesn't mean that everyone is forced to broadcast it, though.
Also, seems that it is "out there" in public view, so, not suppressed by any means:
1 |
79 |
| JOINED: |
Apr 2026 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(Yesterday, 08:08 PM)DBCowboy Wrote: Does Trump have freedom of speech?
He does but everyone knew what he was going to say and most all collectively decided that whatever he had to say meant fuck all.
Fairly representative of how most the civilized world views him and by some extension his base.
4 |
524 |
| JOINED: |
Jun 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

12 |
69 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

2008 Barack Obama 69 million votes
2012 Barack Obama 66 million votes
2016 Hillary Clinton 66 million votes
2020 Joe Biden 81 million votes
2024 Kamela Harris 75 million votes
does anyone really think that Joe Biden was that popular?
in 2024 the Republicans flooded the swing states with lawyers and poll watchers for this exact reason. under scrutiny fraud wasn't possible and in a fair election Mr. Trump won.
Kamela's vote total suggests fraud in blue states where no one was watching.
Democrats: welfare fraud, medicare fraud, child care fraud...but no voter fraud?
128 |
6,473 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
|