Trump says he bombed Iran

[xuenchen]

Looks like Trump started another phase of decoy strategy today!
Decoy Intel in the Congress Briefing!!!! 
The bait is taken again by MSM 
MSM in complete disarray now 

[Oldcarpy2]

Looks like Trump started another phase of decoy strategy today!
Decoy Intel in the Congress Briefing!!!! 
The bait is taken again by MSM 
MSM in complete disarray now 

Would you care to explain what the Hell you are on about?

[sahgwa]

Per above , lack of radiation does not mean anything about the bombing not doing much as 
1. nukes could be super deep so no radiation escapes (thats why we do underground testing)
2. nukes could be super clean in their detonation or destruction, 60 years ago, let alone now. 

Or maybe its all theatre and not only did they all agree on this show, but Iran has nothing underground there.

[andy06shake]

Today initially An audio interview with a 'hack from South Dakota' 
Let me check his blog. . . 
Aha

Most of the "bad stuff" is coming from the fission reaction, including those fast neutrons. So the quest of thermonuclear engineering has always been for a means of initiating a fusion reaction (the really big explosion) without an a-bomb to set it off (a really big explosion without the nasty by-products).  The latter quest as birthed all sorts of stories about substances or methods able to accomplish this, from the Red Mercury legends (which I've talked about in my books), to the tests of the so-called "Ripple" technology during the last atmospheric test shot of the American Operation Dominic, a test which I have talked about with our friend and colleague Daniel Liszt (Dark Journalist) on his show.  This last test, according to publicly available information,  was the last atmospheric test of a hydrogen bomb done by the United States in 1963, and was personally authorized by then-president Kennedy. The test allegedly achieved a fusion reaction that was "99.99 percent clean", i.e., with very little residual radioactive fallout.  Shortly after this test, the Soviet Union signed the nuclear test ban treaty, and my suspicion is that the USA, under Kennedy's prompting, shared the results of the test with the Soviets.  The reason for the sudden Soviet acquiescence is simple: if the USA did manage to explode a "clean" hydrogen bomb, then the unthinkable just became thinkable: one could achieve strategic destruction on a potential enemy without the radioactive fallout blowback on oneself.

Here is wikipedia for you

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Dominic

Housatonic test
October 30, 1962 16:02:??jamt (−11 hrs)

Believed in use during Dominic, Fishbowl, HT I.[sup][14][/sup]

Johnston Island, Johnston Atoll [Image: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c...tton2b.png]13.7°N 172.2°W0 + 3,700 m (12,100 ft) air drop,

weapons development

Kinglet primary with Ripple II secondary[sup][21][/sup]9.96 Mt[sup][19][/sup] [sup][1][/sup][sup][6][/sup][sup][9][/sup][sup][11][/sup][sup][12][/sup][sup][20][/sup][sup][19][/sup]


Repeat of Androscoggin, successful, target accuracy within 100 ft (30 m); last U.S. nuclear weapon airdrop. Reportedly 99.9% clean.[sup][19[/sup]


 19.  Grams, Jon (28 May 2021). "Ripple: An Investigation of the World's Most Advanced High-Yield Thermonuclear Weapon Design". Journal of Cold War Studies. 23 (2): 133–161.

The claim that the U.S. tested a "99% clean" hydrogen bomb in 1963 that led to the Soviet Union signing the test ban treaty is speculative at best, and it's not supported by declassified evidence as far as i can establish. 

Operation Dominic did include high-altitude tests, but no credible scientific documentation confirms a near-zero fallout thermonuclear device.

Fusion bombs still require a fission trigger, which inherently is going to produce radioactive fallout of some sort. 

The Partial Test Ban Treaty was the result of years of negotiation, and the Cuban Missile Crisis, not secret breakthroughs.

"Red Mercury" and “Ripple technology” come on mate, that's phedoscience and is widely regarded by experts as a myth.

[xuenchen]

FWIW...



CGTN America

@cgtnamerica
·
5s


IRAN FOREIGN MINISTER ARAQCHI SAYS TEHRAN IS ASSESSING WHETHER DIPLOMACY WITH U.S. IS IN ITS INTEREST

Iran Gov topples in a few weeks. They're setting it up 

[sahgwa]

The claim that the U.S. tested a "99% clean" hydrogen bomb in 1963 that led to the Soviet Union signing the test ban treaty is speculative at best, and it's not supported by declassified evidence as far as i can establish. 

Operation Dominic did include high-altitude tests, but no credible scientific documentation confirms a near-zero fallout thermonuclear device.

Fusion bombs still require a fission trigger, which inherently is going to produce radioactive fallout of some sort. 

The Partial Test Ban Treaty was the result of years of negotiation, and the Cuban Missile Crisis, not secret breakthroughs.

"Red Mercury" and “Ripple technology” come on mate, that's phedoscience and is widely regarded by experts as a myth.

So MIT publishes pseudoscience now?
here is the journal quoted

https://direct.mit.edu/jcws/article-abst...m=fulltext

[andy06shake]

So MIT publishes pseudoscience now?
here is the journal quoted

https://direct.mit.edu/jcws/article-abst...m=fulltext

If they are mentioning Red mercury, they do. 

It's a fictional substance, not a real chemical element or compound.

Widely regarded by scientists and intelligence agencies as a hoax or myth.

So pseudoscience indeed. 

And there is no credible evidence that supports its existence or effectiveness.

[sahgwa]

If they are mentioning Red mercury, they do. 

It's a fictional substance, not a real chemical element or compound.

Widely regarded by scientists and intelligence agencies as a hoax or myth.

So pseudoscience indeed. 

And there is no credible evidence that supports its existence or effectiveness.

WTH is red mercury coming from in the MIT journal or the wikipedia citation of the nuclear yield and fallout? Like, seriously? 
Re read, open eyes wider. etc.

You seem to be distracted like a dog by a squirrel by my acquaintance's blog post . Just focus on the meat, which is the data.

Since peoples agility to discern information seems to be distracted by trigger words, maybe next time i will break up the speculative post and the data supporting the numbers into two posts......

[putnam6]

Put me in the mood for some old cowboy movies now.

Some John Wayne movies.

Maybe some Bonanza.

Or the second season of Yellowstone 1923, that will do. 

Suppose i better get back on topic though.

Usually, when a topic drifts it's a sign the topic is played out

The more I look and read, the more I think this was all a bit scripted and worked out. 

LOL, normally, the Middle East would be going bugchit now, yes or no?

LOL it's mostly been the Northeast US...

Somebody on Discord joked that Trump traded Iran's nuclear program for the Democratic nominee for NYC Mayor





John Wayne's The Searchers and True Grit, I still watch once in and while

and most of Clint's westerns, the pinnacle of Sergio Leone's, the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly, the Unforgiven, Pale Rider, Josey Wales

[andy06shake]

WTH is red mercury coming from in the MIT journal or the wikipedia citation of the nuclear yield and fallout? Like, seriously? 
Re read, open eyes wider. etc.

I dont need to, again, red mercury is a complete and utter myth.

And there are about 1000 other people, probably kicking around the site.

That know far more about the stuff that i ever will.

Red mercury is just not a thing.

The myth came about at the arse-end of the Cold War, when ex-Soviet arms dealers were trying to bump gullible people with money silly.

Choose to believe as you please, but that's pseudoscience like i said.

It's like the modern philosopher's stone. 

If you do find some through its apt to be sitting atop " Die Glocke"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_mercury