6 |
1,595 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(06-16-2026, 08:41 AM)Orby Wrote: The Yanks can print as much dosh as they want so long as everyone in the arabs world uses it for buying and selling carbons, or at least someone said that how it works. in their economies. A few more planes worth aint gonna matter if it appeases the Mullahs and Trump. I can't see the problem. Whether Bibi and the Rev Guard agree is yet to be seen 
Printing too much currency leads to hyperinflation, which means that all the previous amassed wealth of the wealthiest in the country, becomes worthless - of less value than the paper it is printed on.
Imagine the hypothetical that Trump was actually worth say, $10 billion when he got into office. And that all he could buy with it after hyperinflation was a weeks worth of burgers, and then he'd be skint. But not only Trump. but the whole government, and all those mega-rich banks and investment companies would be similarly broke.
6 |
1,595 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(06-16-2026, 10:39 AM)putnam6 Wrote: It's not just Daugherty, but OK
So essentially, you believe Iranian azzhats that abuse thier women and think their Mullahs Generals and newspaper never lie either...
and thats enough of Deny Ignorance for me today, haha
[Image: https://media0.giphy.com/media/RLbZ7DYHG.../giphy.gif]
So essentially, you believe American right-wing azzhats that have recently negated women's legal rights and think their Bible waving leaders, generals and media barons never lie either...
6 |
1,595 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(06-16-2026, 11:10 AM)Orby Wrote: Oh I know exactly where you're coming from. This is, in many ways a clash of civilisations. It's just a shame the will isn't there anymore in the West to do what needs doing and finish off the Iranian Revolution experiment once and for all. All this 'negotiating' nonsense, if Orby was in charge Iran would be going through a good old phase of colonisation already 
You'd replace the "Iranian Revolutionary experiment" with some sort of colonialism, which we all know has been a string of historical failures?
The Iranian governmental system is a democratic constitutional and largely secular assembly, with an elected President, but also with a constitutional theocratic head of state. A little bit like England, with a democratic constitutional parliamentary system, with an elected Prime Minister, but with a constitutional monarch as head of state.
307 |
6,505 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(06-16-2026, 03:35 PM)chr0naut Wrote: So essentially, you believe American right-wing azzhats that have recently negated women's legal rights and think their Bible waving leaders, generals and media barons never lie either...
No
Im suggesting there are fluctuating levels of credibility and believability
The Trump administration's points are challenged constantly by the public and the MSM. The mullahs and generals have none of those concerns; they can say whatever they choose, the only heat they are getting is a smallish vocal faction in Iran that wants Iran's leaders dead because they think Iran capitulated, ironically
The Trump administration knows it can't kick the can down the road anymore.
We will know exactly when it's all made public, and we see and hear the Iranian response.
If the Strait isn't open and the Iranian uranium question hasn't been addressed properly in these next 60 days, I might get as fluxmoxxed, emotional, and agitated as the left seems currently.
Hell, I might go to the beach and spin around, saying
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
17 |
5,557 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(06-16-2026, 04:14 PM)putnam6 Wrote: No
Im suggesting there are fluctuating levels of credibility and believability
The Trump administration's points are challenged constantly by the public and the MSM. The mullahs and generals have none of those concerns; they can say whatever they choose, the only heat they are getting is a smallish vocal faction in Iran that wants Iran's leaders dead because they think Iran capitulated, ironically
The Trump administration knows it can't kick the can down the road anymore.
We will know exactly when it's all made public, and we see and hear the Iranian response.
If the Strait isn't open and the Iranian uranium question hasn't been addressed properly in these next 60 days, I might get as fluxmoxxed, emotional, and agitated as the left seems currently.
Hell, I might go to the beach and spin around, saying
[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...4427b9.gif]
A one and a half page Agreement that doesn't address Uranium is not kicking the can down the road road?
Are you raving mad?;
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope. Nothing...
6 |
1,595 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(06-16-2026, 12:09 PM)Orby Wrote: Ok. So what's the answer? Bearing in mind iran really is developing nukes and ballistic missiles. What's the answer instead of destroying their capability?
Iran already has ballistic missiles.
There is no evidence that Iran was developing nuclear weapons, according to the International Atomic Energy Association (IAEA), The Federation of Atomic Scientists (FAS), and the US Intelligence services.
This does not mean that they were not producing weapons, but it doesn't mean that they were, either.
Trumb ended US compliance with Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in 2019, but Iran still was cooperating with IAEA, the UN and the other signatory countries to the JCPOA. It was Trump that broke faith with the agreement and withdrew the US.
Trumb is significantly involved in the Epstein files, with direct allegations against him on record. Trumb's actions of broad unilateral military strikes and seizing sovereign assets are illegal both by US and International laws. He is doing these things for personal public relations reasons. Literally killing people to promote his 'brand'.
We do not know if Iran were actually pursuing atomic weapons, but it is clear that the attacks were purely based upon supposition rather than any fact.
7 |
381 |
| JOINED: |
Apr 2026 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

(06-16-2026, 03:18 PM)chr0naut Wrote: Printing too much currency leads to hyperinflation, which means that all the previous amassed wealth of the wealthiest in the country, becomes worthless - of less value than the paper it is printed on.
Imagine the hypothetical that Trump was actually worth say, $10 billion when he got into office. And that all he could buy with it after hyperinflation was a weeks worth of burgers, and then he'd be skint. But not only Trump. but the whole government, and all those mega-rich banks and investment companies would be similarly broke.
"Printing too much currency leads to hyperinflation,"
Does "Printing" mean strictly currency physically printed or does it include money created from things like loans and simple journal entries that require no new physically printed currency? What about money invested from foreign sources that don't necessarily require new physically printed currency from a foreign government?
7 |
381 |
| JOINED: |
Apr 2026 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

(06-16-2026, 04:37 PM)chr0naut Wrote: Iran already has ballistic missiles.
There is no evidence that Iran was developing nuclear weapons, according to the International Atomic Energy Association (IAEA), The Federation of Atomic Scientists (FAS), and the US Intelligence services.
This does not mean that they were not producing weapons, but it doesn't mean that they were, either.
Trumb ended US compliance with Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in 2019, but Iran still was cooperating with IAEA, the UN and the other signatory countries to the JCPOA. It was Trump that broke faith with the agreement and withdrew the US.
Trumb is significantly involved in the Epstein files, with direct allegations against him on record. Trumb's actions of broad unilateral military strikes and seizing sovereign assets are illegal both by US and International laws. He is doing these things for personal public relations reasons. Literally killing people to promote his 'brand'.
We do not know if Iran were actually pursuing atomic weapons, but it is clear that the attacks were purely based upon supposition rather than any fact.
But Iran suspended cooperation with the IAEA in early July 2025 after President Masoud Pezeshkian signed a parliamentary bill restricting access to nuclear sites citing concerns that inspections could reveal vulnerabilities to further U.S. or Israeli attacks.
IAEA demands access to Iranian nuclear sites 'without delay'
51 |
4,119 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(06-15-2026, 09:21 PM)chr0naut Wrote: So, did Obama go around calling his own party "Democrats In Name Only" (DINO's)?
Or did Obama claim that others in his own administration were bad people and traitors when they disagreed?
Or did Obama claim that reporters were lying, bad reporters?
Or, did Obama go around saying, over and over again, that, "No-one has ever done (... insert obvious BS claim...) like me"?
Obama actually had the DOJ spy on reporters.
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
51 |
4,119 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(06-15-2026, 11:34 PM)Shadow Wrote: Obama wasn't divisive. Republicans just hate black people. We had our first black President, who left office 9 years ago, and you guys still can't get over it.
It was policy.
Jesus!
If you disagreed with Obamaa's policies, the evil communist left called you racist.
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
|