Trump's defamation suit against the media backfires

[ANNEE]

LMAO, so why do you post so much about him?  Oh yeah...TDS.

T -- TRUMP
D -- DEFENSE
S -- SYNDROM

Exactly like the guy wearing the t-shirt saying:  "I VOTED FOR THE FELON"

[Roma]

T -- TRUMP
D -- DEFENSE
S -- SYNDROM

Exactly like the guy wearing the t-shirt saying:  "I VOTED FOR THE FELON"

Why do you hate him so much?

[Nerb]

Gaslit the world since it's creation is a bit of a ridiculous statement.

OK, Ok, maybe not it's creation, but how about 1957 as an example?:

The spaghetti-tree hoax was a three-minute hoax report broadcast on April Fools' Day 1957 by the BBC current-affairs programme Panorama, purportedly showing a family in southern Switzerland harvesting spaghetti from a "spaghetti tree". At the time of the report's broadcast, spaghetti was relatively unknown in the United Kingdom, and a number of viewers contacted the BBC afterwards for advice on growing their own spaghetti trees. Decades later, CNN called this broadcast "the biggest hoax that any reputable news establishment ever pulled".

BBC Spaghetti Tree Hoax. 1957

[Knows]

Video exposing the BBC defaming Trump   

[quintessentone]

Video exposing the BBC defaming Trump   

"Legally, the BBC considers itself on good ground.
 Trump's case appears to rely on two main points - jurisdiction and malice.
 
He is suing from Florida and needs to prove that audiences in the so-called Sunshine State saw the Panorama programme, in order to prove that it impacted him negatively."

"One claim in his filing is that viewers watched via virtual private networks (or VPNs). Even if that is correct, did that happen in significant numbers to cause him reputational damage and can the BBC really be held responsible for the behaviour of unlawful users of its services?
 Claims about a Canadian company called Blue Ant Media distributing the documentary in the US would be more problematic if true.
 
The company has since confirmed it had the rights to distribute the programme but "none of Blue Ant's buyers have aired it in the US", a spokesperson said. They added that the international version of the Panorama episode did not actually contain the clip of the Trump speech in question, as the programme had been cut down in a number of places for time."

BBC declares it will fight the US President but should it?

I don't see that Trump will be able to prove he suffered any type of damages.

[Knows]

"Legally, the BBC considers itself on good ground.
 Trump's case appears to rely on two main points - jurisdiction and malice.
 
He is suing from Florida and needs to prove that audiences in the so-called Sunshine State saw the Panorama programme, in order to prove that it impacted him negatively."

"One claim in his filing is that viewers watched via virtual private networks (or VPNs). Even if that is correct, did that happen in significant numbers to cause him reputational damage and can the BBC really be held responsible for the behaviour of unlawful users of its services?
 Claims about a Canadian company called Blue Ant Media distributing the documentary in the US would be more problematic if true.
 
The company has since confirmed it had the rights to distribute the programme but "none of Blue Ant's buyers have aired it in the US", a spokesperson said. They added that the international version of the Panorama episode did not actually contain the clip of the Trump speech in question, as the programme had been cut down in a number of places for time."

BBC declares it will fight the US President but should it?

I don't see that Trump will be able to prove he suffered any type of damages.

Trump is the most respected World leader of our time. Defamation is World Wide. You can't alter video's and claim to be  News.  Another example of FAFO .
Trump could pull his support for Ukraine and a million other things.

[chivo]

Why do you hate him so much?

"Because the man in the news says so"

Sorry I know I wasn't for me I'm just playing prediction

[Kurokage]

Oops!  OK  I do try to stay on track

FROM OP:  On Thursday, members of the Pulitzer Prize Board fired back at Trump’s long-running defamation lawsuit by dropping a 12-page legal broadside in Okeechobee County, Florida, demanding that the president finally prove it. Not with Truth Social posts. Not with cable hits. But with sworn disclosures, financial records, and potentially even his medical history.

This thread isn't about Trump's attempts at suing the BBC.

I apologise, I meant to type isn't and typed is!!!

My bad.

[Kurokage]

Trump is the most respected World leader of our time. Defamation is World Wide. You can't alter video's and claim to be  News.  Another example of FAFO .
Trump could pull his support for Ukraine and a million other things.

Tell that to the Albanian Prime Minister, the Canadians ,French, Mexicans, or even Russia?!?!

[Oldcarpy2]

OK, Ok, maybe not it's creation, but how about 1957 as an example?:

Errrm...that was an April Fools joke?