Trump says he bombed Iran

[RazorV66]

Why is finding this source so difficult for you?

Syria and weapons of mass destruction - Wikipedia

Jesus Christ...Wikipedia?

Syria never had a nuclear weapon.

[quintessentone]

Radiation form an underground source does not reach the surface over night. All their test indicated was that there was not radiation leak from the underground explosions.

Still no radiation detected.

"No increase in radiation detected after strikes on Iran nuclear sites: IAEAThe International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has confirmed that no abnormal radiation levels have been recorded following the recent airstrikes on three of Iran’s nuclear facilities by the US."No increase in radiation detected after strikes on Iran nuclear sites: IAEA - The Statesman

$100 Million of the taxpayer's money wasted.

[quintessentone]

Jesus Christ...Wikipedia?

Syria never had a nuclear weapon.

Well, Wikipedia says it did have a nuclear program helped by N. Korea. So prove they did not have any nuclear weapons (supplied by N. Korea?).

[Ignorant]

Jesus Christ...Wikipedia?

Syria never had a nuclear weapon.

What's wrong with wikipedia?

[angelchemuel]

I saw on a news video that the air was measured for radiation and they found absolutely none. Does that hint at it being empty of that which target they were going after?

No, it absolutely does not. Which news video was that please?
When something that deep down gets buried, highly unlikely any radiation will have leaked to the surface that quick, if any. If you apply a modicum of comprehension to what the American General at the Pentagon explained very clearly, burrying the production area beyond repair or further access was the target and mission. 
Even the American's wouldn't want any radiation leaking now would they?
Again, and I know I'm wasting my breath, but I'll try one more time, where is your evidence that the complexes were "empty" and what do you mean by "empty".

[quintessentone]

No, it absolutely does not. Which news video was that please?
When something that deep down gets buried, highly unlikely any radiation will have leaked to the surface that quick, if any. If you apply a modicum of comprehension to what the American General at the Pentagon explained very clearly, burrying the production area beyond repair or further access was the target and mission. 
Even the American's wouldn't want any radiation leaking now would they?
Again, and I know I'm wasting my breath, but I'll try one more time, where is your evidence that the complexes were "empty" and what do you mean by "empty".

No increase in radiation detected after strikes on Iran nuclear sites: IAEA - The Statesman

Empty of the main target, those being the enriched uranium and equipment.

[SomeStupidName]

Well, Wikipedia says it did have a nuclear program helped by N. Korea. So prove they did not have any nuclear weapons (supplied by N. Korea?).

You still haven't listed an independent source you on Iran that you consider valid.

[angelchemuel]

You still haven't listed an independent source you on Iran that you consider valid.

Well, he seems to think Wiki is a good source.
God I miss ATS where you had to provide links to sources of comments!
Rainbows
Jane

[angelchemuel]

No increase in radiation detected after strikes on Iran nuclear sites: IAEA - The Statesman

Empty of the main target, those being the enriched uranium and equipment.

So, if radiation leaks were/are detected, that would be proof enough to you that the complexes were not empty? Hmmmm OK

[Ignorant]

Well, he seems to think Wiki is a good source.
God I miss ATS where you had to provide links to sources of comments!
Rainbows
Jane

Wikipedia pages are typically well-sourced. Try clicking the little numbers next to the text, or scroll down