Trump says he bombed Iran

[Orby]

Did you forget the /sarc at the end of that post?

It's a job half done plus they never got the uranium. Time to get real and get the job done. If you're going to start a fight you better finish it or they come back at you.

[quintessentone]

It's a job half done plus they never got the uranium. Time to get real and get the job done. If you're going to start a fight you better finish it or they come back at you.

They, as in Iran, throughout history never came for anyone. Other countries have always threatened the USA because they felt threatened in the first place.

[Orby]

They, as in Iran, throughout history never came for anyone. Other countries have always threatened the USA because they felt threatened in the first place.

Lol are you serious? After 7/10 Iran was targeted for elimination or at the very least regime change. Iran through its foreign agenda and proxies has been behind mass terror for generations. It just needs eliminating properly which I'm sure is in the planning. It will be game on again soon.

[quintessentone]

Lol are you serious? After 7/10 Iran was targeted for elimination or at the very least regime change. Iran through its foreign agenda and proxies has been behind mass terror for generations. It just needs eliminating properly which I'm sure is in the planning. It will be game on again soon.

There are many countries where regime change is needed, including the USA, who is "blurring the line between self-defense and aggression".

----

"Terrorism is used to justify war primarily by framing non-state attacks as acts of war that require military, rather than law enforcement, responses.  This justification relies on several key mechanisms:

• Reclassification as War: Large-scale attacks, such as the September 11, 2001 events, are treated as acts of war to authorize the full spectrum of military responses, including detention without trial and preemptive strikes. 
  
• Broad Legal Authorization: The 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) allowed the U.S. to use force against any nation, organization, or person linked to the attacks, a scope that expanded to justify wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and ongoing drone campaigns. 
  
• Preemptive Doctrine: The threat of terrorism with weapons of mass destruction led to a retribution principle where suspected terrorist groups or their state sponsors could be attacked preemptively, blurring the line between self-defense and aggression. 
  
• Strategic Rhetoric: Defining terrorism as a global strategic threat rather than a tactical crime allows powerful states to frame military interventions as necessary for global security, often using terms like "War on Terror" to legitimize actions that might otherwise face international legal scrutiny."(LLM)
  

---

I don't know whether to look at the USA or Israel as to who is who's state-sponsored proxy to terrorism, worldwide and throughout history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_and..._terrorism

---

Xi supposedly told Trump that China will not supply arms to Iran, could be true then again not be true. It is in China's and Russia's economic favor to keep the war going.

Doesn't that make China a proxy to terrorism and the USA still wants to trade with them?

"Yes, Russia is supplying arms to Iran. Moscow has acknowledged providing military equipment to Tehran under a technical-military cooperation agreement, despite denying claims that it shares intelligence on US military positions." (LLM)

USA temporarily eases sanctions on Russia due to Iran/Israel/USA war...make it make sense.

[Orby]

There are many countries where regime change is needed, including the USA, who is "blurring the line between self-defense and aggression".

----

"Terrorism is used to justify war primarily by framing non-state attacks as acts of war that require military, rather than law enforcement, responses.  This justification relies on several key mechanisms:

• Reclassification as War: Large-scale attacks, such as the September 11, 2001 events, are treated as acts of war to authorize the full spectrum of military responses, including detention without trial and preemptive strikes. 
  
• Broad Legal Authorization: The 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) allowed the U.S. to use force against any nation, organization, or person linked to the attacks, a scope that expanded to justify wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and ongoing drone campaigns. 
  
• Preemptive Doctrine: The threat of terrorism with weapons of mass destruction led to a retribution principle where suspected terrorist groups or their state sponsors could be attacked preemptively, blurring the line between self-defense and aggression. 
  
• Strategic Rhetoric: Defining terrorism as a global strategic threat rather than a tactical crime allows powerful states to frame military interventions as necessary for global security, often using terms like "War on Terror" to legitimize actions that might otherwise face international legal scrutiny."(LLM)
  

---

I don't know whether to look at the USA or Israel as to who is who's state-sponsored proxy to terrorism, worldwide and throughout history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_and..._terrorism

---

Xi supposedly told Trump that China will not supply arms to Iran, could be true then again not be true. It is in China's and Russia's economic favor to keep the war going.

Doesn't that make China a proxy to terrorism and the USA still wants to trade with them?

"Yes, Russia is supplying arms to Iran. Moscow has acknowledged providing military equipment to Tehran under a technical-military cooperation agreement, despite denying claims that it shares intelligence on US military positions." (LLM)

USA temporarily eases sanctions on Russia due to Iran/Israel/USA war...make it make sense.

USA is not a terror nation from the fence I sit on. Yu may see it that way. From my side they are generally a force for good for us Brits. As are israel. These are our allies. We bat on the same side. We suffer as one Islamic terror on a regular basis. No more Iran is good news if you sit this side of the fence. I can't see why one would want Iran to continue. It's a pointless troublesome nation for the West and needs eliminating for the good of civilisation. It's so simple and with our weaponry proving very achievable. .

[quintessentone]

USA is not a terror nation from the fence I sit on. Yu may see it that way. From my side they are generally a force for good for us Brits. As are israel. These are our allies. We bat on the same side. We suffer as one Islamic terror on a regular basis. No more Iran is good news if you sit this side of the fence. I can't see why one would want Iran to continue. It's a pointless troublesome nation for the West and needs eliminating for the good of civilisation. It's so simple and with our weaponry proving very achievable. .

From my position on that fence, I see Israel as the aggressor in that region as well as committing war crimes such as genocide. For the USA or any other country to join in with them and for others to condone these aggressive and illegal war genocidal actions is something I can not understand.

[Oldcarpy2]

USA is not a terror nation from the fence I sit on. Yu may see it that way. From my side they are generally a force for good for us Brits. As are israel. These are our allies. We bat on the same side. We suffer as one Islamic terror on a regular basis. No more Iran is good news if you sit this side of the fence. I can't see why one would want Iran to continue. It's a pointless troublesome nation for the West and needs eliminating for the good of civilisation. It's so simple and with our weaponry proving very achievable. .

You seem to be calling for genocide?

[govshill2]

There are many countries where regime change is needed, including the USA, who is "blurring the line between self-defense and aggression".

----

"Terrorism is used to justify war primarily by framing non-state attacks as acts of war that require military, rather than law enforcement, responses.  This justification relies on several key mechanisms:

• Reclassification as War: Large-scale attacks, such as the September 11, 2001 events, are treated as acts of war to authorize the full spectrum of military responses, including detention without trial and preemptive strikes. 
  
• Broad Legal Authorization: The 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) allowed the U.S. to use force against any nation, organization, or person linked to the attacks, a scope that expanded to justify wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and ongoing drone campaigns. 
  
• Preemptive Doctrine: The threat of terrorism with weapons of mass destruction led to a retribution principle where suspected terrorist groups or their state sponsors could be attacked preemptively, blurring the line between self-defense and aggression. 
  
• Strategic Rhetoric: Defining terrorism as a global strategic threat rather than a tactical crime allows powerful states to frame military interventions as necessary for global security, often using terms like "War on Terror" to legitimize actions that might otherwise face international legal scrutiny."(LLM)
  

---

I don't know whether to look at the USA or Israel as to who is who's state-sponsored proxy to terrorism, worldwide and throughout history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_and..._terrorism

---

Xi supposedly told Trump that China will not supply arms to Iran, could be true then again not be true. It is in China's and Russia's economic favor to keep the war going.

Doesn't that make China a proxy to terrorism and the USA still wants to trade with them?

"Yes, Russia is supplying arms to Iran. Moscow has acknowledged providing military equipment to Tehran under a technical-military cooperation agreement, despite denying claims that it shares intelligence on US military positions." (LLM)

USA temporarily eases sanctions on Russia due to Iran/Israel/USA war...make it make sense.

Keep in mind China has a massive deep state operation just like The U.S. 
The "Leaders" like Xi and Trump can overcome them, but it's not easy as we've seen.

[govshill2]

They, as in Iran, throughout history never came for anyone. Other countries have always threatened the USA because they felt threatened in the first place.

as like "feelz" and "feltz"?   

[Orby]

From my position on that fence, I see Israel as the aggressor in that region as well as committing war crimes such as genocide. For the USA or any other country to join in with them and for others to condone these aggressive and illegal war genocidal actions is something I can not understand.

The aggressor lol? They had all their land stripped from them first by Europe / Nazis, then in the arab lands after that. Masses of aggression, then oh dear Israel gets a chance and fights back! masses of wealth property and land stolen from them. In both Europe, then north Africa and the ME. I guess you wanted them to end up like the rest in the Americas or even dead. Bad news sonny, they fought back