Trump says he bombed Iran

[xuenchen]

Wouldn’t that give validity that the leaked intel has credence?

It's a decoy

[Oldcarpy2]

It's a decoy

How is it a "decoy"?

[putnam6]

Well, that's convenient.

Still not seeing anyone but Trump claim the targets were completely obliterated.

And that's not what the satellite imagery indicates. 

I'm seeing words like destroyed and severely damaged, but not obliteration.

And I'm also not seeing any kind of reports of radiological signatures being detected in the area. 

Meaning the 60% enriched Uranium may well have been removed from the site by that big line of trucks that was sitting outside for some reason or another.

[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/images/trucks.jpg]

LOL, there's less credible and verified evidence they moved anything, than the degree of destruction of Fordow, yet some lap that the uranium been moved you dont know

Al Jarreeza is using this FFS. It's an interesting story for sure, I could see them suggesting that they should try to move it, but that doesn't make it so.

What's next? Aliens took Iran's uranium and are storing it on the moon, and will help Iran restore its nuclear program at the time of the Supreme Poobah's choosing.....after all WE DON'T KNOW

If it's damaged by 50% that's a plus...

If Iran tries to start rebuilding, Mossad will know; they have likely installed or have made new Iranian connections already in addition to whatever network remains.

Both America and Israel have operated with a lot of confidence and surety; they have a helluva lot of sorties without losing a pilot.

Im supremely confident Iran's nuclear program is in worse shape than a month ago...

[xuenchen]

I saw on a news video that the air was measured for radiation and they found absolutely none. Does that hint at it being empty of that which target they were going after?

Who was the "source" that you seemed to believe automatically? 

[xuenchen]

What's wrong with wikipedia?

The "Sources" need to be verified every time 

[xuenchen]

No increase in radiation detected after strikes on Iran nuclear sites: IAEA - The Statesman

Empty of the main target, those being the enriched uranium and equipment.

Any U in those facilities was in containers and all that got buried deep. They don't keep U just lying around like jars of honey 

[Oldcarpy2]

Who was the "source" that you seemed to believe automatically? 

https://thedefensepost.com/2025/06/22/ra...tack-iran/

The IAEA.

[xuenchen]

Wikipedia pages are typically well-sourced. Try clicking the little numbers next to the text, or scroll down

.. then try proving the sources are true 

[xuenchen]

This is how I see the Trump propaganda with this issue. LOL

[Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7uZVkExtTBU]

How do you see the illusions of and the maintaining of the illusions of an Ayatollah 

[andy06shake]

Any U in those facilities was in containers and all that got buried deep. They don't keep U just lying around like jars of honey 

So the site was ""completely obliterated"" but none of the containers were breached, check.

They must be some robust containers and then some. 

Guess these GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators.

Can manage to penetrate hundreds of feet of earth and concrete.

But just can't breach a few steel containers.  

Well, that's handy, conscientious even.