The Halls of Amenti Have Been Discovered Under the Giza Plateau

[KKLoco]

How do they get what amounts to side scan radar from orbit/

From what I understand, Professor Corrado Malanga and Filippo Biondi, have integrated two existing technologies. 

Obviously, I'm excited about the possibilities. However, I am uncertain of the validity.  I'll wait for the translated video, then let the experts weigh in. At this point, we need proof. I will post the translated video as soon as its released.

[KKLoco]

Not sure why this isn't linking properly. Click on the 'watch on YouTube' to redirect, if interested. 

[sahgwa]

There are two large caveats to this story:
One is that Malanga is known as a UFOlogist more than anything, which obviously in and of itself is meaningless but casts some doubt on his impartiality on exactly what he is looking for.
Another is that using this radar tomography in such a new way, to utilise the vibration of the structure due to fault lines and seismic activity, is a very vague proposition and doesn't really make the whole structure or area as 'transparent' as they are stating, necessarily.  To extrapolate this data out to necessarily include such structures is not necessarily very accurate.
So we will see.

[Byrd]

From what I understand, Professor Corrado Malanga and Filippo Biondi, have integrated two existing technologies. 

Obviously, I'm excited about the possibilities. However, I am uncertain of the validity.  I'll wait for the translated video, then let the experts weigh in. At this point, we need proof. I will post the translated video as soon as its released.

The geologists I've talked to (who use the tech) are dismissive of it.

[sahgwa]

The geologists I've talked to (who use the tech) are dismissive of it.

Per my post above it's kind of like, vague enough that they could be just doing the old pareidolia thing.  Its just very inaccurate seeming.

[Nerb]

An interesting and informative video of the many tunnels under the Giza Plateau. Plenty of clips of them in the video and a man who has personally explored some of them walking, climbing and crawling his way until sometimes encountering blockages that seem to have been placed there from the other side.
 

Trevor Grassi is an independent researcher, writer, filmmaker, and artist with a deep interest in ancient mysteries, particularly the search for the Hall of Records at Giza. For nearly two decades, he has collaborated with civil engineer and ‘Gizatologist’ William Brown to investigate underground structures near the Sphinx and throughout the Giza Plateau.

Their research has produced ground-penetrating radar scans, photographs, videos, and personal accounts suggesting a subterranean network of tunnels and chambers potentially linked to the record chambers described by Edgar Cayce. They have documented their findings in a three-part documentary series titled “The Secret Underworld of Giza.”

A great watch. Posted 2 days ago on the channel of Jay Anderson of Project Unity, 1h 46m long and really good.....

SHOCKING Findings UNDERNEATH Giza Plateau & More!!

[KKLoco]

Thank you for posting that. Now I have something to do this afternoon!

[sahgwa]

More erudite explanation of what I was trying to allude to above; this seismic tomography, tomographic radar is not accurate enough to be able to conclusively create those CGI models and call them reality.
I know there is more underground there, but the online video craze about the large pylons or shafts that is self perpetuating is based off of data that is too vague as of yet.
It is giant blobs, it could be anything. It could be errors. It could be bad data.
 The technique uses the constellation (4) of Italian multi-purpose satellites in a solar orbit and can image anywhere on the earth due to their orbits (a little bit at a time…can only collect 450 images a day).
In it’s most high resolution mode (spotlight SAR) the imaged area is 10X10 kilometers. The area of the Cheops pyramid in an image of this size is about one tenth of one percent of the image (sparse data on the pyramid in the image)
The satellite(s) traversing the sky in their orbit form the synthetic aperture. The radar ‘chirps’ many multiple times as it traverses the pyramid area and forms an image from these individual ‘chirps’. The satellites are designed to form an image of the (stationary) surface of the earth, and can be used for multiple purposes including predicting earthquakes (distance from satellite to earth surface decreases because surface is bulging).
So far, so good. It’s what the satellite and onboard Synthetic Aperture Radar was designed for.
The technique claims to be able to measure microscopic surface vibrations of the pyramid and ground around it. I don’t yet understand how this is possible (they say using phase shift of radar waves returning from earth to satellite) but give them credit for this as being a possibility.
The technique further claims that the surface vibrations they are sensing are from earthquake / naturally occurring displacements. This to me would seem to be a difficult ‘displacement/vibration’ source. It’s not consistent from event to event. The quake events happen from different displacement sources at different locations, have different amplitudes (intensity of the quake) at different distances and each will have a different (think heartbeat chart) vibration signature that happens over seconds. Within just one quake/imaging event, if the satellite happened to be in the right portion of it’s orbit traversing the pyramid area when a quake event were taking place, the amount of vibration energy being reverberated by the structure would change from low to mid to low to high etc during the course of the image data collection due to the ‘heartbeat’ pattern of earthquake activity. The data stimulating the pyramid to shake is inconsistent during the course of the data collection. It would seem impossible to get good consistent data during the (it takes many multiple ‘chirps’ of the radar to form one image) imaging timeframe. But maybe…perhaps they figured out a way to smooth the data. Again give them possible credit.
The technique claims to be able to characterize voids within the structure/ground based on how the above vibrations manifest on the surface of the structure…again by analyzing micro-millimeter movements from space (by a radar whose object size resolution on the surface of the earth is 1 meter at the smallest). This seems highly problematic. Especially since the data it produces to claim ‘new’ voids in the pyramid do not clearly identify known voids in the pyramid (the chambers we all know). This sort of claim needs to be verified on much more simple objects before it can be reliably applied to ‘unknown’ voids. Example: they should pick a temple or cave or similar structure with a very simple structure, a known internal void…apply their technique and verify the technique produces data that represents the known void in the structure. This kind of application would produce confidence in the data they are collecting / their projections that they can predict internal structure.
The extrapolation of the fuzzy ‘void’ data to line drawings of what some surmise is below the surface is pure fantasy and I suspect based more on the (previously referenced on this site) remote viewing data than on the fuzzy SAR image data. There is a much greater similarity between the images being shown and the remote viewing sketches than between the SAR image blobs and the images shown.
I believe Dr Farrell has taken the correct position in his blog about this new data. We all would love to see it verified as truth and to learn more about any structures in the future. But what’s being present has too finite a level of detail and speculation about geometric details based on the data provided by the satellite SAR data / earth-shake events.

[KKLoco]

They also mapped the great pyramid, and found what we know is already there, and much more.

Here is a 3 part series that I found fascinating. SPOILER: People are illegally digging in their basements on the Giza Plateau already. If you're impatient, the last 20 minutes in the 3rd episode shows footage of them going through endless shafts. Then, they start getting into the chambers that actually have writings on the walls.

[Nerb]

Here is a 3 part series that I found fascinating....

 Oh goody, something to watch after a very hard day's work. Thankyou.

I have always found this Egyptology stuff fascinating, perhaps since I saw the Tutankhamen Exhibition all those years ago at The British Museum. I still have the guidebook.

I was yacking with ChatGPT the other day about my theory of how they built one of the Pyramids and we ended up referencing the daughter of "Ra" called "Ma'at" and "The Ceremony Of The Feather" which she presided over where they weigh the hearts of those waiting to go into the afterlife. If you are not worthy, the "Gobbler" eats the heart and that's your lot. lol.

Cheers. :beer: