Second 'Secret City' Found Beneath Giza Pyramids?

[pianopraze]

Msn

These new subterranean structures, apparently found underneath the Mankaure pyramid, could ‘prove’ the existence of a massive subterranean complex which links the three Giza pyramids thousands of feet below the surface.
The announcement sparked controversy amongst archaeologists and Egyptologists, who said the unverified claims are ‘a total scam’ and argued the technology used isn’t able to penetrate deeply enough into the ground.

i’ll wait to see if it re-writes history, but exciting this tech finally in our hands. 

dad worked for nasa in the 70’s and 80’s telling me how they looked through the desert sands and were looking at things Anchient cities buried in the sands.

glad to see it on headlines now. Hawas says he didn’t discover it so it’s not real…

[quintessentone]

Hawas is not alone in his opinion.

"Now, geologist Dr. James Kennett suggests geological evidence that Egypt may have experienced catastrophic flooding caused by a comet strike thousands of years ago. He points to Abu Hureyra in Syria - about 1,000 miles from Giza - where scientists found material from a potential ancient impact."
"Analysing hieroglyphs within the Temple of Edfu - 780 miles south of Giza - author and researcher Andrew Collins talked about a devastating flood that wiped out a mysterious civilisation known as the 'Eldest Ones.'"

"He also highlights the mention of a hidden chamber called the 'Underworld of the Soul', which he thinks could connect to underground structures in the Giza area. "This I am sure relates to Giza's cave system and any structures it may contain," Collins added."

https://www.uniladtech.com/news/new-theo...6-20250501

[KKLoco]

From the article:

"It’s widely accepted that the only way to prove the existence of the pillars is for targeted digs to take place underneath the pyramids.'

They don't need to do any digs. There are tons of access points that the Egyptian antiquities have blocked off. They know what's. down there. They don't want it to be known as it would change history and many peoples world view.

[rickymouse]

It seems to be that the people who wrote history over the years do not want to admit there were advanced civilizations of hominoids here long before modern humans took over.  They want us to believe that we are the most advanced and intelligent beings on the earth.  The fact that we have created all the chemicals and plastics that will permanently damage our ecosystem isn't convincing them that we are stupid.  Plus we created nuclear weapons that could kill off a lot of life on earth which is not really intelligent either.  Poisoning all the microbes that can repair our ecosystem is also not intelligent.

There could have been hundreds of advanced races of beings that died off because they damaged their environment over the millions of years that humans or human like beings have been on this earth, with only those that could have survived the environmental changes surviving.  I wonder what stupidity destroyed these other races of beings, probably some of the same stupid things we are doing these days.

Sorry to be griping, but I am an environmentalist at heart, I drive a car that is gas powered, but we do not drive that much, and we love nature and would never want to live in a big city. The wife and I have tried to keep our environmental impact fairly small, but still want to enjoy our lives a little.  We have owned our last car for five and a half years and have put twenty five thousand miles on it, we recycle pretty much but are not crazy, and we do consider a lot of the unaccepted archeology without discounting it because the consensus of the time does not match it.  Our ancient history that is accepted by the people who consider themselves "experts" does not seem to be correct because their beliefs in their knowledge they hold seem to be incorrect.

The teachings of Columbus discovering America with all kinds of people already living here sounds kind of stupid to me.  Some of the people living here at the time were even white people that had migrated from Europe.

[ArMaP]

Hawas says he didn’t discover it so it’s not real…

Can you provide a source for that?

Thanks in advance.

[quintessentone]

From MSN source on page 1.

"Filippo Biondi, co-author of the research, told MailOnline their data shows a 90% probability that the Menkaure shares the same pillars as Khafre. "

So, Biondi is not an archaeologist:

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/author/37085368207

And what exactly is this 'special' algorithm he uses to read his data (?)

I think we need Biondi and his colleagues to have a debate with archaeologists.

[ArMaP]

From MSN source on page 1.

"Filippo Biondi, co-author of the research, told MailOnline their data shows a 90% probability that the Menkaure shares the same pillars as Khafre. "

So, Biondi is not an archaeologist:

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/author/37085368207

And what exactly is this 'special' algorithm he uses to read his data (?)

I think we need Biondi and his colleagues to have a debate with archaeologists.

I've seen cases like this before:
1 - someone uses a common technology and claims something the technology could or couldn't show;
2 - they create a secret algorithm to make sense of the data gathered;
3 - they state the algorithm and data show something that "may" be something else;
4 - nothing is proved.

[quintessentone]

I've seen cases like this before:
1 - someone uses a common technology and claims something the technology could or couldn't show;
2 - they create a secret algorithm to make sense of the data gathered;
3 - they state the algorithm and data show something that "may" be something else;
4 - nothing is proved.

The video has the co-author Malanga interpreting what he thinks he sees under the Pyramid of Cheops (you can translate it to English, if my translation setting changes did not take effect). They are claiming the same structures connect three pyramids. 




I notice in the comments section, questions/comments were not addressed, here's one:

"Mr. Corrado, do you really think it's possible to get through those stone slabs with x-rays? Wake up people! It's basic physics."

[pianopraze]

Can you provide a source for that?

Thanks in advance.

It was on the Joe Rogan podcast, people are ripping him for it all over twitter. 




Here are some examples of the twitter posts:twitter

Zahi Hawass:
- Pretty much discovered everything in Egypt.
- Only Egyptologist with an open mind.
- All the answers are in his books.
- Most archaeology books on the pyramids are wrong, unless written by him and Mark Lehner.

… in his words …

Newsweek trying to make him sound good even exposed it. his constant answers to most of Joes's question were, as Newsweek quotes: Newsweek

Rogan asking, "How do you know?" and Hawass replying, "I found it—I wrote it."

[sahgwa]

Msn


i’ll wait to see if it re-writes history, but exciting this tech finally in our hands. 

dad worked for nasa in the 70’s and 80’s telling me how they looked through the desert sands and were looking at things Anchient cities buried in the sands.

glad to see it on headlines now. Hawas says he didn’t discover it so it’s not real…

They are using that same seismic radar tomogrophy which uses nothing but seismic vibrations to paint blurry pictures based on vibrational densities.  I think the same way the first 'find' was too vague to be confirmed as a structure, let alone a city, also paints this in a very poor light.

The technology is not made for finding solid structures underground.