Scottish Girl gonna' start a revolution!

[WallFlowerActive]

They tried that. 

They proved themselves wrong.

So you have proof the incident was reported before it was posted online.  And who was that by?  Which still begs the question if the guy was filming the girls after being told to stop by them as evidence, how did the video end up as a spectacle online vs being given to the police.

[ReturnofBroccoli]

If the guy was supposedly filming the girls by following them where they told him to stop, I’m asking the obvious questions and time line.

If the video was going to be evidence how did it get online.  

My claim is the video was reported because it ended up on line.  The opposite view it was reported otherwise where people can’t provide who actual reported the incident and as in when it was reported relating to when the video was actually posted.  Like security video.  I can leave my shop, have it broken into over night, and the person opening the store can report the incident because something made them watch the security video from over night on the server.

Cops confirmed they were called to St Ann Lane, in the Lochee area of Dundee, just after 7:30pm on Saturday, the day of the event. Its in the news articles I keep posting. Also, besides the grocery store cctv that shows the girls stopped the couple and harassed them there was also an eye witness that said that as well.

[IDELB2006]

So you have proof the incident was reported before it was posted online.  And who was that by?  Which still begs the question if the guy was filming the girls after being told to stop by them as evidence, how did the video end up as a spectacle online vs being given to the police.

Give it up man.

You have moved the goal posts on info you have posted yourself.

[Oldcarpy2]

If the guy was supposedly filming the girls by following them where they told him to stop, I’m asking the obvious questions and time line.

If the video was going to be evidence how did it get online.  

My claim is the video was reported because it ended up on line.  The opposite view it was reported otherwise where people can’t provide who actual reported the incident and as in when it was reported relating to when the video was actually posted.  Like security video.  I can leave my shop, have it broken into over night, and the person opening the store can report the incident because something made them watch the security video from over night on the server.

I give up.


You are way too much invested in this and aren't listening to other posters.

I have no idea why you are so obsessed about this.

Good night.

[WallFlowerActive]

Fatos Ali Dumana films the blade incident.  How is he allowed to keep the video and post the video online instead of turning it over as evidence to the police.  I don’t get that?  From everting I can find, Fatos Ali Dumana’s video is what was used on social media and went viral?  
 
Did someone else video tape the video? And post?

if he didn’t post the video, it wouldn’t have gone viral.  Not blame, just a fact.
 
I just don’t get it.  I would think if you were harassed, you would turn over the video from following the girls to law enforcement.  
 
And from what I have seen, media isn’t allowed to give out the girls names.  Where more and more, the girls faces are blurred out in recent articles. So, how was Dumana’s allowed to keep the video of the minors? Especially a video that should be part of an ongoing case?
 
So.  How does Dumana not turn over the video to police.  And then Dumana posts the video showing the identity of the minors.  And the video then goes viral, seized upon by people that want to turn it into a witch hunt against Dumana.  Where there is supposedly a police order to stop misinformation concerning the case.  But the girls make supposedly all kinds of false accusations in the video that gets posted to social media.  Yet Dumana somehow was able to post the video. With no consequences?
 
That just seems weird.

[Nerb]

She's brandishing weapons, which does not look very restrained.

She never actually used either of the items which is restrained.

[midicon]

I can't see that young girl carrying around those weapons as a regular thing. They are too big, bulky and naive. It is more likely that she has fetched them from home for the specific purpose of defending her sister. Really no more than  a childish attempt to frighten them off. It might be that her sister called and she rushed there to defend her in a stupid neddish childish way. Of course the men would laugh, record and say show us those again.

We don't know the history of the area regarding migrants or asylum seekers. I have three granddaughters and wouldn't want some Bulgarian gypsy wannabee gangster anywhere near any of them.

I am not against immigration or asylum seeking. I had a Nigerian family move next door to me around six months ago. They have recently been given a council house and just before they left the dad held the foyer door open for me and said 'I have told all my friends about you', which was a nice thing to say.
I can see that people can have problems though for many reasons.

[covent]

There is always more to every story and in this case, I think these girls have previously encountered this man.

According to information in this thread, the man uses social media to extol his gangsta status and in which he  refers to women as whores. 

There were three children involved, the sisters and another girl who was assaulted and knocked to the ground. As yet, no reported charges for this assault. 

There is conflicting information about the woman who assaulted the third child. She has been referred to as the man's sister and they have been referred to as a couple.

The sisters' mother is a nurse working within a nearby prison. 

The police have video evidence of altercation between the parties. One is from commercial CCTV the other was posted online.

The Chief Superintendant's statement concludes with how investigations are ongoing.

I really hope the police have taken the man's phone for evidence in this investigation. I want to know if he has previously filmed the 12yr old. Police forensic data equipment will be able to extract anything deleted that might provide better insight into the true situation.

[midicon]

The police have video evidence of altercation between the parties. One is from commercial CCTV the other was posted online.

The Chief Superintendant's statement concludes with how investigations are ongoing.

I really hope the police have taken the man's phone for evidence in this investigation. I want to know if he has previously filmed the 12yr old. Police forensic data equipment will be able to extract anything deleted that might provide better insight into the true situation.

I wouldn't trust the police when it comes to immigrants or asylum seekers. They have an agenda not to show the aforesaid in a bad light lest it adds to local discontent.

[ReturnofBroccoli]

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1484312202...7S9Ucbxw6v

I found this video in a Google search because I was curious about something and it shows a little more than the ones ive seen recently posted. You can obviously watch it without a facebook account as Google crawled it. She definitely looks like the aggressor, threatening him at the end of the video too. She's looking in a pretty bad light. When I look at the man, I dont see a "gangster" I see a digital creator that I believe is listed on his social media platform. I see no affiliated markings of any kind on any photo and gangsters dont hold back they would of straight up knocked that kid out until she looked silly probably beat her pretty bad because they have no remorse and dont care. Thats what gangster is. Gangster tolerates no disrespect and its full throttle all the way every day. Gangster's also usually armed, like that girl, funny right?