106 |
5,993 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(08-31-2025, 08:27 AM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: Because I have some class?
Where it’s been determined if the girls had a pipe they still me in as much trouble. So the table knife and hatch are actually irrelevant.
I’ve made it clear to my daughter if she is ever bullied at school just punch the person. There will still be consequences, but I’ll still stand behind her. If some older dude was fallowing her around and filming her, I’d be more than happy for her to grab the axe. Rocks. Brach. Whatever she needs as a deterrent.
Is it racist white Christian nationalist class?
And that's broken English at best.
How is going through a park "fallowing" her around?
The dude videoed their attack and contacted the police, with evidence to support his claims.
What happened is plain and clear.
Your weird, twisted rambling and thoughts on the matter, not so much.
You're playing "what if" and not very well, I may add.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
106 |
5,993 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(08-31-2025, 08:30 AM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: Do you understand what I posted when I refer to them as teenage girls?
”So. They ant human just trash to you?”
So, you think they are trash.
They are neds.
They tick every single definition of the initialism.
Running around the streets and parks armed to the teeth, brandishing weapons.
And you can't put words in my mouth.
You are calling them trash.
I know exactly what they appear to be.
Sad, pathetic little girls, who want to pay more attention in class as opposed to GB News on the TV.
Bad parents, really, because they are supposed to teach them right from wrong, which they obviously failed to do.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
27 |
2,058 |
| JOINED: |
May 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

08-31-2025, 08:44 AM
This post was last modified: 08-31-2025, 08:46 AM by WallFlowerActive. 
(08-31-2025, 08:33 AM)andy06shake Wrote:
How is going through a park "fallowing" her around?
Photography is my hobby. I can take pictures of my kid at the playground. If other children happen to get in the picture, where I try to minimize it, it’s not a big deal.
I can’t just photograph other child. That’s f’s up. And would rightly get my ass handed to me.
Added. Where the dude should be a man and called the law if the girls wronged him is someway.
You are seriously defending a guy that was following around two teenage girls filling them. Where he is explicitly told to stop when it becomes unwanted behavior at that point. So that makes it stalking, harassment, and invasion of privacy.
Where you justify it by calling two teenager girls you never met Ned’s. So as an adult you can feel better about yourself and pay tribute to your optics god. Where you ignore those girls probably live in an environment of fight and flight so they aren’t taken advantage of. Where nobody has to be right in the situation. Where if the girls started throwing rocks they be in the same legal trouble.
27 |
2,058 |
| JOINED: |
May 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

08-31-2025, 08:45 AM
This post was last modified: 08-31-2025, 08:47 AM by WallFlowerActive. 
Accidentally quoted self
106 |
5,993 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(08-31-2025, 08:44 AM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: Photography is my hobby. I can take pictures of my kid at the playground. If other children happen to get in the picture, where I try to minimize it, it’s not a big deal.
I can’t just photograph other child. That’s f’s up. And would rightly get my ass handed to me.
Added. Where the dude should be a man and called the law if the girls wronged him is someway.
You are seriously defending a guy that was following around two teenage girls filling them. Where he is explicitly told to stop when it becomes unwanted behavior at that point. So that makes it stalking, harassment, and invasion of privacy.
Where you justify it by calling two teenager girls you never met Ned’s. So as an adult you can feel better about yourself and pay tribute to your optics god. Where you ignore those girls probably live in an environment of fight and flight so they aren’t taken advantage of. Where nobody has to be right in the situation. Where if the girls started throwing rocks they be in the same legal trouble.
If the kids are attacking you with offensive weapons, i think you may find you are perfectly at liberty to record the attack.
As a matter of fact, police would encourage you to do so if at all possible.
Guy was simply out and about with his own family, and you dont have a shred of evidence to suggest otherwise aside from in your own sick and twisted head.
You're the one trying to justify the unjustifiable.
Again, work with the facts and not your racist delusions.
They were in trouble, hence the Police response and actions.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
27 |
2,058 |
| JOINED: |
May 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(08-31-2025, 08:35 AM)andy06shake Wrote: And you can't put words in my mouth.
I asked you this.. You do understand I asked you a question.
(08-31-2025, 08:21 AM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: So. They ant human just trash to you?
Which is a play on US phrases on people calling people white trash.
Where you replied…
(08-31-2025, 08:27 AM)andy06shake Wrote: Your words, not mine.
I asked if you thought they were trash, and you agreed you thought they were trash?
In no way can any reasonable person think I was calling them trash. But it is very reasonable you agreed in my assumption you think they are trash is correct.
22 |
779 |
| JOINED: |
Feb 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(08-31-2025, 08:25 AM)andy06shake Wrote: As to redeeming qualities, name any that they had on display, please?
Restraint.
Nobody got stabbed or chopped did they?
Wisdom knocks quietly, always listen carefully.... and be a River flowing calmly.
106 |
5,993 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(08-31-2025, 08:45 AM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: Accidentally quoted self
Dont worry about it.
Easy mistake to make.
But sticking up for racist little neds armed to the teeth, carrying offensive weapons.
Well, that's a rather different kettle of fish.
And a harder task to accomplish.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
106 |
5,993 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(08-31-2025, 08:54 AM)Nerb Wrote: Restraint.
Nobody got stabbed or chopped did they?
Why would you have an axe and a steak knife for restraint?
She's brandishing weapons, which does not look very restrained.
Point of fact that's considered rather antagonistic and assault under our law.
And i would also point out that the full-grown man also showed restraint.
And foresight.
Because if he had reacted violently, we know exactly how that one would have gone down, and who would have been blamed.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
27 |
2,058 |
| JOINED: |
May 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(08-31-2025, 08:51 AM)andy06shake Wrote: If the kids are attacking you with offensive weapons,
They showed or brandished the weapons after being followed.
Do you have any evidence of an actual attack before the girls told the guy to stop following them.
And what law or laws in the UK to follow a “criminal” instead of calling the law. And what law allows a grown man to fill strangers by following them. Especially after being told to stop following them.
I’m guessing none. I’m guess UK law requires a person to retreat, only defend themselves if cornered, and is required not to purse a criminal as a civilian, and is obligated to make themselves safe and contact the police as soon as possible.
|