18 |
5,843 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope. Nothing...
18 |
5,843 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope. Nothing...
61 |
10,450 |
| JOINED: |
Feb 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

"Two-thirds of Americans want quick end to Iran war even if goals unachieved, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds"
------
"March 31 (Reuters) - Two-thirds of Americans believe that the U.S. should work to end its involvement in the Iran war quickly, even if that means not achieving the goals set out by the Trump administration, a Reuters/Ipsos poll found.
Some 66% of respondents to the poll, conducted Friday through Sunday, voiced that view, while 27% said the U.S. should work to achieve all its goals in Iran, even if the conflict goes on for an extended period. Six percent did not answer the question."
"Among Trump's Republicans, 40% supported ending the conflict quickly even if it did not achieve U.S. goals, while 57% supported a longer involvement."
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-eas...026-03-31/
"The only journey is the one within."
2 |
862 |
| JOINED: |
Jan 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

03-31-2026, 04:15 PM
This post was last modified: 03-31-2026, 04:17 PM by SteamyAmerican. 
(03-31-2026, 04:09 PM)quintessentone Wrote: "Two-thirds of Americans want quick end to Iran war even if goals unachieved, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds"
------
"March 31 (Reuters) - Two-thirds of Americans believe that the U.S. should work to end its involvement in the Iran war quickly, even if that means not achieving the goals set out by the Trump administration, a Reuters/Ipsos poll found.
Some 66% of respondents to the poll, conducted Friday through Sunday, voiced that view, while 27% said the U.S. should work to achieve all its goals in Iran, even if the conflict goes on for an extended period. Six percent did not answer the question."
"Among Trump's Republicans, 40% supported ending the conflict quickly even if it did not achieve U.S. goals, while 57% supported a longer involvement."
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-eas...026-03-31/
Odd way of saying the U.S. has no approved plan going forward and sure as shit doesn’t know what the goals are there, let alone a viable timeframe.
Anyway I’m sure it was necessary for whatever they tell us it was for.
In other news, you can fool some people all of the time still holds true…
9 |
2,147 |
| JOINED: |
May 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

03-31-2026, 04:19 PM
This post was last modified: 03-31-2026, 05:12 PM by RazorV66. 
(03-31-2026, 04:15 PM)SteamyAmerican Wrote: Odd way of saying the U.S. has no approved plan going forward and sure as shit doesn’t know what the goals are there, let alone a viable timeframe.
Anyway I’m sure it was necessary for whatever they tell us it was for.
In other news you can fool some people all of the time still holds true…
Edit
Quoted the wrong person.
2 |
862 |
| JOINED: |
Jan 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

18 |
5,843 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

(03-31-2026, 04:28 PM)SteamyAmerican Wrote: Foreigner? Lulz.
You can’t even read. Or spell.
That was funny, you foreigner you!
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope. Nothing...
18 |
5,843 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

I don't think our King should be going on a State visit to the US.
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope. Nothing...
309 |
6,524 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

Instead of all the extraneous Trump bullshit, just say
I want the Ayatollah to have nuclear weapons to smite down the free world
I want the IIRG to shut down the Strait at its leisure
I want women of Iran to continue to get whacked in the head with a rusty machete
Quote:Eric Daugherty
@EricLDaugh
·
1h
? BREAKING: Sec. Marco Rubio just dropped TRUTH NUKES on the doubters for two minutes straight, and he said it perfectly
He's so good at this.
"Under NO circumstances can a country run by radical Shia clerics with an apocalyptic vision of the future ever possess nuclear weapons, and under no circumstances can they be allowed to hide and protect that program and their ambitions behind a shield of missiles and drones that no one can do anything about!"
"Many Americans are asking, why did the United States have to attack Iran now? Well, let me EXPLAIN."
"Iran wants to have nuclear weapons...they build their reactors and their facilities deep in mountains, away from the public glare, and they want to enrich that material."
"Why the attack now? Well, what was Iran trying to do? Iran was trying to build a conventional shield, in essence, have so many missiles, have so many drones, that no one could attack them, and they were well on their way."
"We were on the verge of an Iran that had so many missiles and so many drones, that no one could do anything about their nuclear weapons program in the future. That was an intolerable risk."
"This was our LAST best chance to eliminate that conventional threat, that conventional shield that they were trying to build, and the president made the right decision to wipe it out now."
"That is the goal of this operation, to destroy their conventional missiles and their drone program so they can't hide behind it, and finally have to deal with a world seriously about never ever having nuclear weapons."
WELL SAID, MARCO ??
9 |
2,147 |
| JOINED: |
May 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

03-31-2026, 05:05 PM
This post was last modified: 03-31-2026, 05:08 PM by RazorV66. 
(03-31-2026, 04:28 PM)SteamyAmerican Wrote: Foreigner? Lulz.
You can’t even read. Or spell.
Can you?
That's how it's spelt.
Edit-  
My bad, I meant to reply to the foreign idiot.
|