UAP/UFO stuff

[quintessentone]

Don’t want to make a thread on this so I’ll contribute here: Twitter link

Gaurdian uk 2018 look at the popes scarf. Notice anything?

[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/images/Pr.png]


Why does he have Peruvian symbol on it?

That emblem is the Atacama Giant and, "specifically, was used to symbolize northern Chile, and the choice aimed to connect the Catholic faith with local cultural and historical elements, in a gesture of respect and cultural integration."

Do aliens wear big footwear like that, or have humongous feet, or wear headresses? I don't recall any contactee/abductee mentioning big feet or a headdress. AI Search: The Atacama Giant's headdress is made up of lines that were used to track the seasons and predict the rainy season. The headdress's points would align with the moon to indicate the season.

https://mymodernmet.com/atacama-giant-an...-geoglyph/

It is described as being a human figure, but here is a pic of other symbols that might be of interest. I enlarged it.

Maybe you should have made a separate thread on this because supposedly the Pope said he is ready to baptize Martians.

[AlienSun]

Without full and truthful disclosure how are we suppose to figure out what exactly will be dropping? I want to see citizens take this matter in their own hands, whether that be IR filming, remote viewer contact with friendly ET to get answers to our questions, bringing down questionable drones (perhaps half human, half ET tech) perhaps funded by MUFON or inclusion and donation by people with lots of interest and cash, and debunk any social media manipulation, etc.

Perhaps many answers lie in the hardware, but we would need our own citizen/scientist community doing the investigations.

Do you serious think that TPTB have not intensely studied the situation of all aspects of a full contact decades ago and continue still at it?  (But maybe now more interested in preparing the public, as we can plainly see?)  

(I have first-hand experience and knowledge about the real purpose of MUFON.  It is supposed to look at what you want, public (more or less) investigations into the phenomena.  While many, many serious individuals have worked with MUFON, it is nothing more than a poor-man's Project Blue Book, a cover to appease the interested public and give them a false sense that SOMEBODY is investigating this thing with the UFOs.)

[quintessentone]

Do you serious think that TPTB have not intensely studied the situation of all aspects of a full contact decades ago and continue still at it?  (But maybe now more interested in preparing the public, as we can plainly see?)  

(I have first-hand experience and knowledge about the real purpose of MUFON.  It is supposed to look at what you want, public (more or less) investigations into the phenomena.  While many, many serious individuals have worked with MUFON, it is nothing more than a poor-man's Project Blue Book, a cover to appease the interested public and give them a false sense that SOMEBODY is investigating this thing with the UFOs.)

Without the means to actually bring down a UAP in the citizen/scientific community we will never have full disclosure, until ET bypasses government and comes directly to us. I don't expect that to happen during my lifetime and I want it now. The drones over cities, I believe, are advanced man-made tech, and if the purpose was to 'prepare' us for disclosure then why follow up with 'it's ours'? That does not make sense.

I used MUFON as an example (none of us know what MUFON would do given the means to retrieve UAPs), but we also have Avi Loeb, the Tedesco Brothers, and others that through various methods can only film/monitor these sightings. We need to bring the physical unmanned probes/UAPs down for study outside the government, is my point, and nobody seems to want to go there, yet.

MUFON offers field investigation training, imagine what other training/activities they could develop with the monetary means to do so, maybe even retrieval (?)

[pianopraze]

He's from Argentina.

Who said that was definitely an alien?

--Just asking for a friend.

I said “Peruvian symbol" not "alien"

;)

[quintessentone]

I said “Peruvian symbol" not "alien"

;)

But your source screams 'alien', so that is the link/context/connection.

[AlienSun]

Without the means to actually bring down a UAP in the citizen/scientific community we will never have full disclosure, until ET bypasses government and comes directly to us. I don't expect that to happen during my lifetime and I want it now. The drones over cities, I believe, are advanced man-made tech, and if the purpose was to 'prepare' us for disclosure then why follow up with 'it's ours'? That does not make sense.

I used MUFON as an example (none of us know what MUFON would do given the means to retrieve UAPs), but we also have Avi Loeb, the Tedesco Brothers, and others that through various methods can only film/monitor these sightings. We need to bring the physical unmanned probes/UAPs down for study outside the government, is my point, and nobody seems to want to go there, yet.

MUFON offers field investigation training, imagine what other training/activities they could develop with the monetary means to do so, maybe even retrieval (?)

You consider MUFON, what, wanting answers like some of us? in 1976 I turned down the offer of being the editor of their then Skylook newsletter because of their stance.

Later, I got in an argument in print with them because they would not accept abduction accounts as legitimate.  Later, with the Cash-Landom (?) case near Houston, they did not support the case, and still later, they also dismissed an incredible account I shared with them of two, close, low, slow and silent (evidently triangles) witnessed by an ex-paratrooper and his young son in March of 1985.  MUFON, like Google, is not your friend.

I still have the postcard that the former owner of  the outfit, Walt Andrus, sent me with his rejection of the case being viable.

[727Sky]

[quintessentone]

You consider MUFON, what, wanting answers like some of us? in 1976 I turned down the offer of being the editor of their then Skylook newsletter because of their stance.

Later, I got in an argument in print with them because they would not accept abduction accounts as legitimate.  Later, with the Cash-Landom (?) case near Houston, they did not support the case, and still later, they also dismissed an incredible account I shared with them of two, close, low, slow and silent (evidently triangles) witnessed by an ex-paratrooper and his young son in March of 1985.  MUFON, like Google, is not your friend.

I still have the postcard that the former owner of  the outfit, Walt Andrus, sent me with his rejection of the case being viable.

I see you are claiming they are too skeptical, where I just read someone claim they are not skeptical enough. Well, you can't please everyone all the time.

[AlienSun]

Without the means to actually bring down a UAP in the citizen/scientific community we will never have full disclosure, until ET bypasses government and comes directly to us. I don't expect that to happen during my lifetime and I want it now. The drones over cities, I believe, are advanced man-made tech, and if the purpose was to 'prepare' us for disclosure then why follow up with 'it's ours'? That does not make sense.

I used MUFON as an example (none of us know what MUFON would do given the means to retrieve UAPs), but we also have Avi Loeb, the Tedesco Brothers, and others that through various methods can only film/monitor these sightings. We need to bring the physical unmanned probes/UAPs down for study outside the government, is my point, and nobody seems to want to go there, yet.

MUFON offers field investigation training, imagine what other training/activities they could develop with the monetary means to do so, maybe even retrieval (?)

You consider MUFON, what, wanting answers like some of us? in 1976 I turned down the offer of being the editor of their then Skylook newsletter because of their stance.

Later, I got in an argument in print with them because they would not accept abduction accounts as legitimate.  Later, with the Cash-Landom (?) case near Houston, they did not support the case, and still later, they also dismissed an incredible account I shared with them of two, close, low, slow and silent (evidently triangles) witnessed by an ex-paratrooper and his young son in March of 1985.  MUFON, like Google, is not your friend.

I still have the postcard that the former owner of  the outfit, Walt Andrus, sent me with his rejection of the case being viable.

[quintessentone]

You consider MUFON, what, wanting answers like some of us? in 1976 I turned down the offer of being the editor of their then Skylook newsletter because of their stance.

Later, I got in an argument in print with them because they would not accept abduction accounts as legitimate.  Later, with the Cash-Landom (?) case near Houston, they did not support the case, and still later, they also dismissed an incredible account I shared with them of two, close, low, slow and silent (evidently triangles) witnessed by an ex-paratrooper and his young son in March of 1985.  MUFON, like Google, is not your friend.

I still have the postcard that the former owner of  the outfit, Walt Andrus, sent me with his rejection of the case being viable.

Double posting to a double post (first double post I've seen here).

I see you are claiming they are too skeptical, where I just read someone claim they are not skeptical enough. Well, you can't please everyone all the time.