UAP Hit by Hellfire Missile Video Shown to Congress

[Chronum]

UAP hit by hellfire missile video shown to congress. Pretty interesting if real.
UAP video on X

[Kwaka]

As this occurred in Yemen, it is possible that it is a live fire event. So who's side is the UAP on? Got good intel and capability to counter like that. What kind of picture does it paint when reviewing the 1000's of other similar videos?

Are these instead exercises of some next generation technology? Maybe Trump should call it plasmadome instead of irondome? Alex Jones came out with a good episode around the time this video came out at the Senate.

ALEX JONES [3 of 4] Monday 9/8/25 • ASHTON FORBES - INTEL ON FREE ENERGY, TELEPORTATION & MORE! • Infowars

[imitator]

I think the most interesting part of the vid is the Hellfire’s precision, the way it slowed down and turned in... looks to be a non-explosive type, no blast, clean hit, the target breaking apart and the missile continues to fly on, etc...

It does look reminiscent of when they used a non-explosive missile on the Chinese balloon back in 2023.

Though, I'm not sure what they hit this time... could've ruined first contact or some kid's leftover party balloon.

[Kurokage]

It is an interesting video, but with a lot of these, it's hard to make out any real detail.  

Here's a video to help understand the Hellfire AGM-114 that was used.

[UltraBudgie]

Analysis of impact and parallax from Mick West:

[Unknownparadox]

Analysis of impact and parallax from Mick West:

[Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTedmssoj24]

LOl he said the missile worked and shot it out of the air. And it is still flying. But he says it is stationary. But if you look at the white caps. Which you can clearly follow. The object is moving past them.

[UltraBudgie]

LOl he said the missile worked and shot it out of the air. And it is still flying. But he says it is stationary. But if you look at the white caps. Which you can clearly follow. The object is moving past them.

I thought this part was a pretty good explanation of parallax, and the appearance of motion that can occur when a moving observer views a target and a stationary background at two different distances:



It is clear from the frame-by-frame that the missile did not detonate or destruct and the (apparent) debris comes from the target object, although I'm not convinced by his theory that the missile was the non-explosive R9X variant he mentioned:

[Kwaka]

Analysis of impact and parallax from Mick West:

Mick does a good job in describing how the missile is flying at about half of height that the drone is flying. As for what direction the drone is flying in relation to the missile will also make a difference in trying to determine the speed of the missile in relation to the speed that the ocean waves pass by.

It does get hazy when zooming in on the missile and how Mick described it as a balloon. I cannot fault him for that, because it does look like a balloon. But this conflicts with the official story of the video being a Hellfire missile that got hit, not a balloon. How is a Hellfire missile suppose to look on a video when being tracked?

For the object that hit what was being tracked. It does demonstrate excellent maneuverability with how it curves in and out of striking the tracked object.

[Unknownparadox]

I thought this part was a pretty good explanation of parallax, and the appearance of motion that can occur when a moving observer views a target and a stationary background at two different distances:

[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...-52-59.png]

It is clear from the frame-by-frame that the missile did not detonate or destruct and the (apparent) debris comes from the target object, although I'm not convinced by his theory that the missile was the non-explosive R9X variant he mentioned:

[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...71712.jpeg]

I know what he is saying with the math. I also understand the white caps are moving. I also understand the object doing the filming is moving.

The biggest problem with what he is saying is. The missile did it's job. But the object is taking it's sweet time to find the ocean. It would seem to be clear it isn't in the ocean, since the white caps are not covering.

[quintessentone]

As this occurred in Yemen, it is possible that it is a live fire event. So who's side is the UAP on? Got good intel and capability to counter like that. What kind of picture does it paint when reviewing the 1000's of other similar videos?

Are these instead exercises of some next generation technology? Maybe Trump should call it plasmadome instead of irondome? Alex Jones came out with a good episode around the time this video came out at the Senate.

ALEX JONES [3 of 4] Monday 9/8/25 • ASHTON FORBES - INTEL ON FREE ENERGY, TELEPORTATION & MORE! • Infowars

Just speculating that it may have been a next generation spy balloon from IDF (Israel) who is working with a new company named Skypearl. The Houthi's do have many different types of missiles, so this may be just one explanation. IDF is attacking in all directions.