Electromagnetic Emissions of UAP/UFO Phenomena

[sparkgapwizard56]

I have been browsing through ATS/Deny Ignorance and similar communities sporadically for a while now but I was interested in making a post here.

Been interested in the UAP/UFO situation for a while now and one thing that is very striking to me, especially in the government disclosure stories (whether you believe those are true or not) is electromagnetic interference caused by these supposed craft. Whether that is reports of what appears to be intentional jamming of radar systems, or interference with electronic equipment being associated with the appearance of a craft, there is an undeniable pattern in many of the UAP claims. 

Has there ever been any attempt to utilize the electromagnetic spectrum in the investigation of the UFO phenomena, I am sure the government has considered it but what about on the amateur side? I hear of people attempting to spot UFO or to interview to supposed abduction victims, but rarely do I hear of any more sophisticated means of investigation. if UAP were to give off some sort of electromagnetic emissions, its technically possible that they could be identified, categorized, and possibly utilized in the investigation of these craft. its openly a possibility to categorize and identify electronic signals, such as open source signal identification libraries that can be used to identify and track specific signals such as Radar, Comms, etc. Why wouldn't the same thing be possible for UAP. Obviously this is a difficult task but its something I wanted to bring about a discussion for because I am not sure if it has really been given a lot of thought before. 

interested to see what you all think.

[Sirius]

Abduction victims all went through hypnosis and drugs as far as I can tell, those that is not planted or otherwise involved in clandestine activities.

Regarding electromagnetic stuff you need to look for EMI. TPTB does investigate radar anomalies. Have also seen rumors about radiation. Check out the "clock stopping" cases, there is a thread around here somewhere. Could be some microwave tech to fuck with tech and people, possibly human. Look for aircraft that flies in search patterns after sightings. Helicopters and such without transponders. Not easy stuff unless you are at the right place at the right time

Depends what you are looking for, if your looking for "black ops" stuff you will find it, if you look for paranormal you will find it. If you look for aliens you will find nothing

[andy06shake]

I have been browsing through ATS/Deny Ignorance and similar communities sporadically for a while now but I was interested in making a post here.

Been interested in the UAP/UFO situation for a while now and one thing that is very striking to me, especially in the government disclosure stories (whether you believe those are true or not) is electromagnetic interference caused by these supposed craft. Whether that is reports of what appears to be intentional jamming of radar systems, or interference with electronic equipment being associated with the appearance of a craft, there is an undeniable pattern in many of the UAP claims. 

Has there ever been any attempt to utilize the electromagnetic spectrum in the investigation of the UFO phenomena, I am sure the government has considered it but what about on the amateur side? I hear of people attempting to spot UFO or to interview to supposed abduction victims, but rarely do I hear of any more sophisticated means of investigation. if UAP were to give off some sort of electromagnetic emissions, its technically possible that they could be identified, categorized, and possibly utilized in the investigation of these craft. its openly a possibility to categorize and identify electronic signals, such as open source signal identification libraries that can be used to identify and track specific signals such as Radar, Comms, etc. Why wouldn't the same thing be possible for UAP. Obviously this is a difficult task but its something I wanted to bring about a discussion for because I am not sure if it has really been given a lot of thought before. 

interested to see what you all think.

Yes.

Investigators of UFO phenomena have repeatedly attempted to use the electromagnetic spectrum to gather evidence.

Off the top of my head, Project Blue Book, and civilian groups like MUFON spring to mind.

Then we have the Navy "Tic Tac" videos, where radar and infrared data from the encounters were recorded.

But as far as im aware, actual verifiable EM signatures of UFOs still remain unconfirmed.

[sparkgapwizard56]

Yes.

Investigators of UFO phenomena have repeatedly attempted to use the electromagnetic spectrum to gather evidence.

Off the top of my head, Project Blue Book, and civilian groups like MUFON spring to mind.

Then we have the Navy "Tic Tac" videos, where radar and infrared data from the encounters were recorded.

But as far as im aware, actual verifiable EM signatures of UFOs still remain unconfirmed.

Checks out with most of what I was able to find as well. If any breakthroughs in that area were to occur, MUFON would probably be the only non governmental entity capable of organizing finding such a thing. There are also amatuer seti and amatuer radio astronomers that constantly have their eyes on the sky. With the rise in affordable and easy to use software defined receivers I think there is potential. Identifying a solid technological signature is a lot more preferable in my opinion than relying on eyewitness/hypnotic regression which can be susceptible to deception and leads to a lot of the negative stigma associated with research in the field

[Sirius]

Checks out with most of what I was able to find as well. If any breakthroughs in that area were to occur, MUFON would probably be the only non governmental entity capable of organizing finding such a thing. There are also amatuer seti and amatuer radio astronomers that constantly have their eyes on the sky. With the rise in affordable and easy to use software defined receivers I think there is potential. Identifying a solid technological signature is a lot more preferable in my opinion than relying on eyewitness/hypnotic regression which can be susceptible to deception and leads to a lot of the negative stigma associated with research in the field

I would stay clear of MUFON or any other groups

[sparkgapwizard56]

I have been looking a bit further into this and frustratingly it seems as if certain organizations almost ignore any attempts at looking for techno signatures and only look at human sources and imagery. Take the immaculate constellation report, we are expected to believe that the US Government with the most sophisticated signals and electronic intelligence apparatus in human history is only looking at imagery and human reports when concerning uap investigations? Its either willful or the NSA likes to keep their secrets tight which is the likely reason. The capabilities of optical sensors on aircraft or resolution of satellites is already known, the signals collection and processing world of course still shrouded in intense secrecy. It was almost comical reading in the report how signals intelligence was able to determine the exact nature of other nations uap investigation programs but not a single aspect of that toolset is indicated by the report to be pointed at investigating uap, only images such as fmv or satellite combined with human reports.

I did find something incredibly interesting though. Project Galileo being ran out of Harvard seems to fit exactly the blind spot I discussed, they are using a systematic and scientific approach using a variety of tools and collection methods tailored with advanced software to process large amounts of data.
the ufo community needs to approach investigation like the government does, fusion of different sources. Optical and imagery, human sources, electronic emissions, and open source data (I.E is there any plausible mistaken cases such as starlink satellites mistaken for ufo). I dont think grainy or blurry photos of lights in the sky will get anyone very far in the investigative process. 
an organization like MUFON would be far better off installing networked sensor rigs in supposed hotspots globally networked together and processed using software than 1000 interviews of so called abduction victims (however that does have merit when approached correctly)

[andy06shake]

I have been looking a bit further into this and frustratingly it seems as if certain organizations almost ignore any attempts at looking for techno signatures and only look at human sources and imagery. Take the immaculate constellation report, we are expected to believe that the US Government with the most sophisticated signals and electronic intelligence apparatus in human history is only looking at imagery and human reports when concerning uap investigations? Its either willful or the NSA likes to keep their secrets tight which is the likely reason. The capabilities of optical sensors on aircraft or resolution of satellites is already known, the signals collection and processing world of course still shrouded in intense secrecy. 

I did find something incredibly interesting though. Project Galileo being ran out of Harvard seems to fit exactly the blind spot I discussed, they are using a systematic and scientific approach using a variety of tools and collection methods tailored with advanced software to process large amounts of data.
the ufo community needs to approach investigation like the government does, fusion of different sources. Optical and imagery, human sources, electronic emissions, and open source data (I.E is there any plausible mistaken cases such as starlink satellites mistaken for ufo). I dont think grainy or blurry photos of lights in the sky will get anyone very far in the investigative process. 
an organization like MUFON would be far better off installing networked sensor rigs in supposed hotspots globally networked together and processed using software than 1000 interviews of so called abduction victims (however that does have merit when approached correctly)

This is the thing with looking for alien life.
 
It may be so different in scope that we simply cannot recognise it in our present condition or with the tools we design. 

It might also be the reason that communication seems tenuous at best.

I mean, we are only just beginning to recognise what constitutes life down here on planet Earth, in so many places...

[SomeStupidName]

Checks out with most of what I was able to find as well. If any breakthroughs in that area were to occur, MUFON would probably be the only non governmental entity capable of organizing finding such a thing. There are also amatuer seti and amatuer radio astronomers that constantly have their eyes on the sky. With the rise in affordable and easy to use software defined receivers I think there is potential. Identifying a solid technological signature is a lot more preferable in my opinion than relying on eyewitness/hypnotic regression which can be susceptible to deception and leads to a lot of the negative stigma associated with research in the field

It would interesting to see someone try to use Muography or Neutrino tomography if it's even possible.

[MichSwampbuck]

I imagine that we have a lot of EMF and radioactive sources here on Earth. Maybe UFOs/UAPs are EMF voids absorbing our radiant waste energy. We should be looking for things that absorb said energies, black zones, and voids that are flying around like UFOs.

[Sirius]

I imagine that we have a lot of EMF and radioactive sources here on Earth. Maybe UFOs/UAPs are EMF voids absorbing our radiant waste energy. We should be looking for things that absorb said energies, black zones, and voids that are flying around like UFOs.

Not convinced about absorbing, seen and been on the receiving side.