Trump says he bombed Iran

[imitator]

The F-bomb has been launched!

5:35 video mark:
You know what we have we basically have
two countries that have been fighting so
long and so hard that they don't know
what the FUCK they're doing...
do you understand that

[putnam6]

Perhaps they are just fast tracking their own destruction. Supposed they get help from China and they are able to make a warhead small enough to work with their missile delivery systems, how many do you think they would need to build undetected by the rest of the world to be able to get to a mutual assured destruction level and how long would that take?

Exactly, it makes no sense even if they got one warhead on one missile 12 or the 13 missiles last night were shot down even the one hitting BerSheva might have been after it was intercepted

NOW - Trump says "the last thing on Iran's mind right now—is nuclear weapons," adding that Iran is "not gonna have enrichment" and will become "a great trading nation."
Source
https://x.com/disclosetv/status/1937527797288771992
Media extracted by FaytuksBot•Today at 11:06 AM


https://x.com/i/grok/share/gOcgY2qkQvu0FJ71QBQovLBHS

 Why It’s Unlikely

• International Consequences: Supplying nuclear warheads to Iran would violate international agreements like the NPT and trigger severe sanctions, diplomatic isolation, or even military retaliation from the U.S. and its allies, including Israel.
  
• Strategic Risks: Russia and China, while opposed to U.S. policies, benefit from a stable Middle East and have no clear incentive to provoke a nuclear-armed Iran, which could destabilize the region further. Both nations are more likely to offer diplomatic or economic support rather than military assistance.
  
• Practical Challenges: Transferring nuclear warheads or technology is a complex operation that would likely be detected by global intelligence networks, leading to preemptive action.
  

 
Conclusion
The international community, including Russia and China, has a vested interest in preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Despite provocative statements from figures like Medvedev, the combination of geopolitical constraints, treaty obligations, and the lack of credible evidence makes it highly unlikely that any country would help Iran fast-track a nuclear warhead.

a WCSWNFB

[putnam6]

The F-bomb has been launched!

5:35 video mark:
You know what we have we basically have
two countries that have been fighting so
long and so hard that they don't know
what the FUCK they're doing...
do you understand that



[Video: https://youtu.be/b29SUVsP-RM?si=MY3aG9NL4GYR_gtH]

I saw that first thing when I woke up, thought it was AI satire... but the President very succinctly shows he has atleast a basic knowledge and understanding of the geopolitical challenges in the region

[xuenchen]

You forgot to blame Biden.  Tsssk....

and Mayorkas 

[putnam6]

This reads like a sour grapes admittance coming from Bloomberg on something Trump did, speaks volumes. 

When the time came, Iranian "friends" stood down because of one man

https://x.com/business/status/1937567103688577493

[Heiden]

You can't trust Iran. Cease Fire is to buy time. I see the anti Trump anti Americans are out in full force

[putnam6]

****unconfirmed**** FWIW


Iranian media Reza Pahlavi has a heart attack The daughter of Reda Pahlavi said that her father had a heart attack in the past few hours and was immediately transferred to the hospital.
Source
https://x.com/ahmadslmanx/status/1937551084169388260
Translated from: Arabic•Today at 12:39 PM

[Ignorant]

This reads like a sour grapes admittance coming from Bloomberg on something Trump did, speaks volumes. 

When the time came, Iranian "friends" stood down because of one man

What's the reason you're crediting Trump for Iran's friends standing down? And can you clarify where exactly Bloomberg stated this? The article is paywalled.

Seems to me they would have stood down regardless. Iran's friends are only its friends outwardly, not in spirit. It doesn't make sense for any of them to stick their neck out to help Iran in a conflict it's bound to lose.

[putnam6]

What's the reason you're crediting Trump for Iran's friends standing down? And can you clarify where exactly Bloomberg stated this? The article is paywalled.

Seems to me they would have stood down regardless. Iran's friends are only its friends outwardly, not in spirit. It doesn't make sense for any of them to stick their neck out to help Iran in a conflict it's bound to lose.

My words and expert "analysis" are above the link...

Im not paying for the Bloomberg article either, the sour grapes are in the post, if you haven't ever read a Bloomberg headline about Trump in the last 8 years, my attempt at humor may not have had anywhere to take root.

Below are a few examples 

https://x.com/i/grok/share/6jDAXFZ3zgfP81NkQ4SWuvXtu
 

Below is a list of negative headlines about Donald Trump from Bloomberg, based on available information from the last eight years (2017–2025). These headlines reflect critical coverage of Trump’s actions, policies, or impact, as reported by Bloomberg or referenced in related sources. I’ve included publication dates and citations where applicable, ensuring the headlines are directly from Bloomberg or quoted in credible sources discussing Bloomberg’s reporting. Note that the list is limited to what’s available in the provided references and may not cover every negative headline Bloomberg published during this period.

• “Bloomberg to Trump: Your Climate Denialism Is Embarrassing America”  
  • Date: June 21, 2017  
    
  • Context: Michael Bloomberg criticized Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris climate accords, calling his silence on climate change “embarrassing” and his coal economy revival plan a “fiction.” The article highlights Bloomberg’s view that Trump’s stance made the U.S. look foolish globally.
    
• “Trump’s Tariffs Created an Economic Sinkhole. He Doesn’t Care”  
  • Date: April 7, 2025  
    
  • Context: This headline criticizes Trump’s tariff policies during his second term, arguing they caused market turmoil and were driven by personal grievances rather than a coherent economic strategy.
    
• “Trump Team Rejects Market Fears, Projecting Defiance on Tariffs”  
  • Date: April 6, 2025  
    
  • Context: The article reports Trump’s dismissal of investors’ concerns about inflation and recession risks from his global tariff policies, framing his approach as defiant and unapologetic despite economic chaos.
    
• “Trump Is Driving Off Investors and Threatening the Dollar’s Reign”  
  • Date: June 18, 2025  
    
  • Context: Shared via posts on X, this Bloomberg headline criticizes Trump’s policies for destabilizing investor confidence and undermining the U.S. dollar’s global dominance.
    
• “President Donald Trump Has Injected New Geopolitical Risks Into an Already Fragile Global Economy”  
  • Date: June 23, 2025  
    
  • Context: This headline, posted by Bloomberg’s official account, highlights Trump’s actions as exacerbating global economic instability, framing his presidency as a source of geopolitical risk.
    
• “Trump’s Bloomberg Businessweek Interview: Complete Text” (Implied Criticism)  
  • Date: July 16, 2024  
    
  • Context: While not explicitly negative in the headline, the interview includes critical exchanges, such as Trump’s contentious debate with Bloomberg’s editor over tariffs, where his economic claims were challenged as misguided. The tone suggests skepticism of Trump’s economic assertions.
    
• “Bloomberg Rips ‘Senselessly Chaotic’ Trump, Demands GOP ‘Start Showing Some Spine’”  
  • Date: June 19, 2025  
    
  • Context: Attributed to Michael Bloomberg, this headline (referenced in X posts) describes Trump’s presidency as chaotic and calls out the GOP for failing to challenge him, reflecting strong disapproval of Trump’s leadership style.
    

Notes:

• Source Limitations: The list is drawn from the provided web and X post references, which may not capture every negative Bloomberg headline over eight years. Bloomberg’s extensive coverage likely includes additional critical pieces, but I’ve focused on what’s explicitly cited.
  
• Context of Negativity: Headlines range from policy critiques (tariffs, climate denial) to broader condemnations of Trump’s leadership (chaotic, grievance-driven). Michael Bloomberg’s personal rivalry with Trump, noted in a 2020 Guardian article, may amplify critical coverage.
  
• Verification: All headlines are either directly from Bloomberg or quoted in reputable sources (e.g., Newsweek, Daily Mail) referencing Bloomberg’s reporting. I’ve avoided speculative or unverified claims from X posts unless corroborated.
  
• Scope: The search results provided limited Bloomberg-specific headlines, so I’ve included those with clear negative framing. If you need a deeper dive, I can search for additional Bloomberg articles, but this would require real-time access beyond the current references.
  

[putnam6]

NOELREPORTS 

@NOELreports
·
5m


 Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian:
A ceasefire has begun.

The war forced on our people by the Zionist entity’s adventurism has ended. The enemy started it, but our nation’s will decided how it ends. The world saw Iran’s strength and unity — and the heavy toll on the aggressor, despite their censorship.