DI Wiki Epstein Archive ATS Archive PDF Archive North Korean TV
 

Trump says he bombed Iran
(06-30-2026, 10:23 AM)andy06shake Wrote: How many enemy satellites does Iran have Orby? 

They are not talking about taking out ground targets with space lasers if that's what you are wondering.

But mirrors spring to mind, where the likes of ballistic missiles and/or warheads are concerned.


Iran gets help from Russia and China through the back door, just as Ukraine gets help from Britain and the USA through the backdoor. You just need to take out all above ground satellites then BRICS / CSTO etc become paralysed. If you're going to take out Iran then it might be worth taking out all three nations at the same time. Good value for money don't you think  Lol
"When you are here for the good of the planet and humanity, the other levels are always trying to protect you in times of danger."
(06-30-2026, 10:28 AM)Orby Wrote: Iran gets help from Russia and China through the back door, just as Ukraine gets help from Britain and the USA through the backdoor. You just need to take out all above ground satellites then BRICS / CSTO etc become paralysed. If you're going to take out Iran then it might be worth taking out all three nations at the same time. Good value for money don't you think  Lol

Orby, destroying "all above-ground satellites" is unrealistic.

And i would have thought all satellites are "above-ground."

Attacking three nuclear powers simultaneously...

Well thats almost certainly going to escalate into a catastrophic global conflict.

How would that be "good value for money?"

Or anything other than suicide?
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
(06-30-2026, 10:34 AM)andy06shake Wrote: Orby, destroying "all above-ground satellites" is unrealistic.

And i would have thought all satellites are "above-ground."

Attacking three nuclear powers simultaneously...

Well thats almost certainly going to escalate into a catastrophic global conflict.

How would that be "good value for money?"

Or anything other than suicide?


A shockingly stupid idea.  Utterly bonkers. Shocked2
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope.  Nothing...
(06-30-2026, 10:34 AM)andy06shake Wrote: Orby, destroying "all above-ground satellites" is unrealistic.

And i would have thought all satellites are "above-ground."

Attacking three nuclear powers simultaneously...

Well thats almost certainly going to escalate into a catastrophic global conflict.

How would that be "good value for money?"

Or anything other than suicide?

Sometimes you just have to take the bull by the horns and do it. In this day and age it's strike before you get striked. No point waiting for the enemy to punch you and get their strike in, just knock 'em out  Lol Thumbup
"When you are here for the good of the planet and humanity, the other levels are always trying to protect you in times of danger."
(06-30-2026, 11:35 AM)Oldcarpy2 Wrote: A shockingly stupid idea.  Utterly bonkers. Shocked2



Yeah yeah yeah Mr Chamberlain, peace in our time  Lol Sometimes you have to take out the opposition before they take you out. The West has the tech to take down China, Russia, Iran at the same time when the moment comes. Why wave you're piece of white paper around when you know they are plotting to take over.
"When you are here for the good of the planet and humanity, the other levels are always trying to protect you in times of danger."
(06-30-2026, 01:35 PM)Orby Wrote:
(06-30-2026, 01:35 PM)Orby Wrote: Yeah yeah yeah Mr Chamberlain, peace in our time  Lol Sometimes you have to take out the opposition before they take you out. The West has the tech to take down China, Russia, Iran at the same time when the moment comes. Why wave you're piece of white paper around when you know they are plotting to take over.
Let me ask you something Orby.
If the United States has such awesome power that no other country comes remotely close, how come Iran is still around? That should have been finished with ease yet here we are.
I am not doubting that it can be done, I question the motives behind such an idea and the logical reasoning to do so. I see none to either of those.
(06-30-2026, 01:31 PM)Orby Wrote: Sometimes you just have to take the bull by the horns and do it. In this day and age it's strike before you get striked. No point waiting for the enemy to punch you and get their strike in, just knock 'em out  Lol Thumbup

Ah yes, the ancient wisdom passed down from the sacred texts of lads standing outside the kebab shop.

"Strike before you get striked"  Lol

Sounds like something my 13-year-old wean shouts while losing at FIFA.

It's not a strategy, just nervous violence in a sentence.

If thats philosophy, Orby, my toaster is Aristotle.  Tongue
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
(06-30-2026, 09:40 AM)Orby Wrote: Lol unprovoked? Ever heard of 7/10?

Hamas and Palestinian Militant groups attacked Israel.

Quote:Marines barracks in Lebanon?

Hezbollah (*note - different from Hamas), but it is very probable that Iran was involved.

Quote:Lockerbye?

'Lockerbie' is the correct spelling.

Libya were the protagonists there. Gadhafi's Libya was more secular and socialist than overwhelmingly Muslim. Gadhafi implied that he was Muslim, but clearly didn't abide by any of its rules, much like Trumb uses Christianity but is outrageously sinful and unrepentant.

Quote:Encircling Israel on multiple borders with proxies?

Umm, those countries and ethnicities existed right there, before 1947. They didn't willfully try and "surround" Israel.

Many Israelis had historically left the area (definitely in regard to local governance and a Jewish state), in their diaspora that started after the fall of Jerusalem in 70 AD.

Other tribes and ethnicities expanded and migrated into the area over the nearly 1,800 years between 70 AD and 1947. Many non-Jewish people groups also existed in the area going way back into prehistory. The Jewish "promised land" was not uninhabited when Moses\Joshua 'took it'.

Quote:Argentinian centre attack?

Hezbollah again.

Quote:Supplying, training proxies in Iraq to blow up western forces? Multiple attacks all over the planet targeting various western countries and organisations. Unprovoked???????? Then the Mullahs wanted nukes plus ballistic missiles to carry them? Sorry, they were never going to be allowed that scenario. Unprovoked lol, that's the funniest thing I've heard all day  Lol

You are mixing up events and groups that were not unified (and some were even at war with each other at the time).

Some of the world's terrorism has been state sponsored - through the CIA.

There was that whole Iran-Contra thing during Reagan's Presidency where the USA was provably a state sponsor of international terrorism and drugs trade.

And who put Saddam Hussein in power? And who funded and armed the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan? And who funded the anti-Castro stuff? And who funded and protected the early Nazi's? And who created fake riots to overthrow the Hawaiian kingdom? And who carried out unprovoked terror attacks against Mexico before invading and taking the states of Texas, California, Nevada as well as parts of present-day Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Wyoming?

So, which is the greater state sponsor of international terrorism?

Nor were Iran likely to be able to attack the USA, even if they had nukes, because the USA has more nukes and better delivery systems than any other country, except for Russia.

You see, no country can use nukes if they have them, because of 'mutually assured destruction'.

If one country tries to use them, other countries will defend and respond with them and it will escalate out of control.

This is the reason that nukes haven't been used in warfare (except by the USA), it is a balance of terror and the nuclear armed countries are funding it and doing it.

Countries that go to war, and attack, rather than just being purely defensive, are primitive and dangerous to the world. War is evil and those that start wars are evil.
Support the Christchurch Call
(06-30-2026, 01:35 PM)Orby Wrote: Yeah yeah yeah Mr Chamberlain, peace in our time  Lol Sometimes you have to take out the opposition before they take you out. The West has the tech to take down China, Russia, Iran at the same time when the moment comes. Why wave you're piece of white paper around when you know they are plotting to take over.
 
More timeless wisdom, eh?

"Just delete the opposition before they delete you." 

Famously first carved into ancient Sumerian stone tablets next to "trust me, brother, I've watched documentaries". Lol

As to the "Peace in our time" Chamberlain quote, and then promptly pivoting to global multiplayer PvP.

That's quite the intellectual arc, Orby.

And after all, nothing says high-level strategy like treating geopolitics like it's Call of Duty with nukes.
 
Also love the confidence "the West can take them all at once."

After all, what could go wrong in the Middle East?  Lol
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
(06-30-2026, 01:35 PM)Orby Wrote: Yeah yeah yeah Mr Chamberlain, peace in our time  Lol Sometimes you have to take out the opposition before they take you out. The West has the tech to take down China, Russia, Iran at the same time when the moment comes. Why wave you're piece of white paper around when you know they are plotting to take over.



That's just deranged.

Iran hasn't been taken down.  Neither has Vietnam, Afghanistan etc.

Russia and China?

Calm down, fella.

You sound like a special  needs 12 year old.
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope.  Nothing...



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Iran is the Graveyard of American Hegemony LightAngel 67 3,703 05-19-2026, 09:45 PM
Last Post: andy06shake
  Jeffrey Sachs warns US militarism risks wider war over Iran LightAngel 3 590 03-10-2026, 08:40 PM
Last Post: Hypntick
  Iran fired 2 missiles at Greek Cyprus, hosting British troops Waterglass 26 1,591 03-04-2026, 09:31 AM
Last Post: putnam6
  Iran’s new missile tactics throw US, Israeli war planning into disarray Waterglass 17 976 03-02-2026, 12:58 PM
Last Post: Harte
  Trump Announces Alaska Summit with Putin Imhere 763 34,701 08-19-2025, 08:56 PM
Last Post: Encia22
  A powerful explosion at an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps base in Iran putnam6 1 377 08-11-2025, 07:56 PM
Last Post: andy06shake
  Trump has moved two nuclear submarines towards Russia Kurokage 51 3,681 08-11-2025, 07:03 AM
Last Post: SomeStupidName
  How the Iran trap works annonentity 15 1,818 07-03-2025, 01:12 AM
Last Post: annonentity