DI Wiki Epstein Archive ATS Archive PDF Archive North Korean TV
 

Trump says he bombed Iran
(05-28-2026, 09:31 AM)DennisR6 Wrote: So the American president flat out lied on more than one occasion about the state of Irans nuclear stockpile. 
Besides Trump gave us his word that Russia was only helping "a bit". His own words contradict whatever it is your trying to sell.

If you're unfamiliar with the world, you'll find that Trump lies as naturally as he breathes.
(05-28-2026, 09:31 AM)DennisR6 Wrote: So the American president flat out lied on more than one occasion about the state of Irans nuclear stockpile. 
Besides Trump gave us his word that Russia was only helping "a bit". His own words contradict whatever it is your trying to sell.

Perfect way to cover classified information.   Saint
(05-28-2026, 09:47 AM)Truthhurts Wrote: If you're unfamiliar with the world, you'll find that Trump lies as naturally as he breathes.



You can tell when he's lying - his lips move.
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope.  Nothing...
(05-27-2026, 10:13 PM)Knows Wrote: Must be living on another planet.  Wow Your living in a fantasy land. Look at reality. Look at these apples. Thank God we have Trump looking out for everyone. 

BREAKING | U.S. Strikes Inside Iran AGAIN


"Everyone"?!

Himself and Israel, to be exact.
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope.  Nothing...
(05-28-2026, 04:02 AM)chr0naut Wrote: What makes you believe that Iran was trying to get nukes?

US Intelligence, the UN and other International monitoring agencies have ALL recently said that there is no sign that that Iran has been developing nuclear weapons.

Only Israel and Trump are saying that Iran is a nuclear threat.


If every man and his dog gets nukes, then surely it makes it more likely that someone some time will use them.

That might include the USA or its allies, too!

MAGAts already think that one half of their own country is plotting violence and death against the other half. Surely you have to admit that can't be a sign of national stability and level headedness?

Why should anyone in the world (including your own country) assume that doesn't pose great danger from the nukes, to the world in the near future?


No human, or team, invented nuclear science.

It's discovery was a very international effort, with everyone learning bits and sharing what they've found with everyone else working in the field.

The Manhattan Project didn't invent the 'magic recipe'. Like any engineering project, it could have been done in lots of different ways. They tried in lots of ways that didn't work. Some did. Some, they never even tried.

Definitely, most of the Uranium used by the Manhattan Project came from the Belgian Congo. Because the USA has stuff-all of its own Uranium.


Science and technology aren't a 'national' thing. They are iterative processes, ones that have vast and diverse contributors.

Weapons, on the other hand, are something that no-one these days should really need. Societies who still need weapons everywhere, are primitive ones.


They didn't. Apartheid ended by the pressure of international sanctions and peaceful internal political pressure.


De Klerk had SA's nukes disassembled and destroyed prior to signing the Treaty on Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) in 1991. They were not given away. The International Atomic Energy Agency verified it.


The Khazar Empire fell in the year 930, when they converted to Judaism.

http://Khazars - Wikipedia

Ukraine existed before the USSR. Ancient Kievan Rus' had its capital in Kiev, Ukraine - Ukraine was the capital of Russia.

But Ukraine did give the nukes away that had been left there after the USSR fell, to Russia. Ukraine also joined the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT).


Sure they did something, they started a war.

* Killing people is bad.
* Killing lots of people is very, very bad.
* Nuclear weapons are very, very bad, because they kill lots of people.
* Wars are very, very bad because they kill lots of people.

So, Starting wars, and having nukes, are very, very, very bad.

Therefore, Don and Pete are...???


Should the also be stored in plastic bags and thrown out if they start getting moldy?

But But
Quote:The IAEA report, leaked to Western media late last month, concluded that Iran now possesses over 400 kg of 60%-enriched uranium—enough, if further enriched, to build approximately 10 nuclear weapons. The report also cited ongoing Iranian non-cooperation on safeguards and expressed “serious concern” over the country’s continued enrichment at levels with “no civilian justification.”

Tehran releases explanatory note defending 60% enrichment Jun 7, 2025

 
(05-27-2026, 11:35 PM)Truthhurts Wrote: The Trump era is marked by the highest level of blatant corruption seen in American history.

The Trump era is uncovering leftist corruption not seen in American history.
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
(05-28-2026, 09:51 AM)Oldcarpy2 Wrote: "Everyone"?!

Himself and Israel, to be exact.

I'm glad someone is looking out for Israel, because no one else is.
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
(05-28-2026, 09:54 AM)govshill2 Wrote: But But

Still not weapons grade.

27.8 kg of weapons grade (90% enriched) Uranium could produce a low-yield first-generation nuclear device (according to the IAEA).

However, 60% enriched Uranium is insufficient to produce any devices.

Enriching 400 kg of Uranium from 60% enriched, to 90% enriched, would optimally yield about 255 kg, however, in the real-world, you could expect significant losses which would mean fewer final devices.

So, 9, or most probably fewer, low-yield first-generation nuclear devices - on paper.
Support the Christchurch Call
(05-28-2026, 07:34 PM)chr0naut Wrote: Still not weapons grade.

27.8 kg of weapons grade (90% enriched) Uranium could produce a low-yield first-generation nuclear device (according to the IAEA).

However, 60% enriched Uranium is insufficient to produce any devices.

Enriching 400 kg of Uranium from 60% enriched, to 90% enriched, would optimally yield about 255 kg, however, in the real-world, you could expect significant losses which would mean fewer final devices.

So, 9, or most probably fewer, low-yield first-generation nuclear devices - on paper.

Maybe in Kiwiland they never heard of dirty bombs.

Might want to google that.
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
(05-28-2026, 09:49 AM)govshill2 Wrote: Perfect way to cover classified information.   Saint

So, it looks like you’re going to stick with the old 3-D chess explanation.



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Iran is the Graveyard of American Hegemony LightAngel 67 3,422 05-19-2026, 09:45 PM
Last Post: andy06shake
  Jeffrey Sachs warns US militarism risks wider war over Iran LightAngel 3 559 03-10-2026, 08:40 PM
Last Post: Hypntick
  Iran fired 2 missiles at Greek Cyprus, hosting British troops Waterglass 26 1,381 03-04-2026, 09:31 AM
Last Post: putnam6
  Iran’s new missile tactics throw US, Israeli war planning into disarray Waterglass 17 911 03-02-2026, 12:58 PM
Last Post: Harte
  Trump Announces Alaska Summit with Putin Imhere 763 33,865 08-19-2025, 08:56 PM
Last Post: Encia22
  A powerful explosion at an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps base in Iran putnam6 1 355 08-11-2025, 07:56 PM
Last Post: andy06shake
  Trump has moved two nuclear submarines towards Russia Kurokage 51 3,263 08-11-2025, 07:03 AM
Last Post: SomeStupidName
  How the Iran trap works annonentity 15 1,710 07-03-2025, 01:12 AM
Last Post: annonentity