4 |
503 |
| JOINED: |
Jun 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(05-28-2026, 09:31 AM)DennisR6 Wrote: So the American president flat out lied on more than one occasion about the state of Irans nuclear stockpile.
Besides Trump gave us his word that Russia was only helping "a bit". His own words contradict whatever it is your trying to sell.
If you're unfamiliar with the world, you'll find that Trump lies as naturally as he breathes.
7 |
346 |
| JOINED: |
Apr 2026 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(05-28-2026, 09:31 AM)DennisR6 Wrote: So the American president flat out lied on more than one occasion about the state of Irans nuclear stockpile.
Besides Trump gave us his word that Russia was only helping "a bit". His own words contradict whatever it is your trying to sell.
Perfect way to cover classified information.
17 |
5,457 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(05-28-2026, 09:47 AM)Truthhurts Wrote: If you're unfamiliar with the world, you'll find that Trump lies as naturally as he breathes.
You can tell when he's lying - his lips move.
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope. Nothing...
17 |
5,457 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(05-27-2026, 10:13 PM)Knows Wrote: Must be living on another planet. Your living in a fantasy land. Look at reality. Look at these apples. Thank God we have Trump looking out for everyone.
BREAKING | U.S. Strikes Inside Iran AGAIN
"Everyone"?!
Himself and Israel, to be exact.
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope. Nothing...
7 |
346 |
| JOINED: |
Apr 2026 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(05-28-2026, 04:02 AM)chr0naut Wrote: What makes you believe that Iran was trying to get nukes?
US Intelligence, the UN and other International monitoring agencies have ALL recently said that there is no sign that that Iran has been developing nuclear weapons.
Only Israel and Trump are saying that Iran is a nuclear threat.
If every man and his dog gets nukes, then surely it makes it more likely that someone some time will use them.
That might include the USA or its allies, too!
MAGAts already think that one half of their own country is plotting violence and death against the other half. Surely you have to admit that can't be a sign of national stability and level headedness?
Why should anyone in the world (including your own country) assume that doesn't pose great danger from the nukes, to the world in the near future?
No human, or team, invented nuclear science.
It's discovery was a very international effort, with everyone learning bits and sharing what they've found with everyone else working in the field.
The Manhattan Project didn't invent the 'magic recipe'. Like any engineering project, it could have been done in lots of different ways. They tried in lots of ways that didn't work. Some did. Some, they never even tried.
Definitely, most of the Uranium used by the Manhattan Project came from the Belgian Congo. Because the USA has stuff-all of its own Uranium.
Science and technology aren't a 'national' thing. They are iterative processes, ones that have vast and diverse contributors.
Weapons, on the other hand, are something that no-one these days should really need. Societies who still need weapons everywhere, are primitive ones.
They didn't. Apartheid ended by the pressure of international sanctions and peaceful internal political pressure.
De Klerk had SA's nukes disassembled and destroyed prior to signing the Treaty on Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) in 1991. They were not given away. The International Atomic Energy Agency verified it.
The Khazar Empire fell in the year 930, when they converted to Judaism.
http://Khazars - Wikipedia
Ukraine existed before the USSR. Ancient Kievan Rus' had its capital in Kiev, Ukraine - Ukraine was the capital of Russia.
But Ukraine did give the nukes away that had been left there after the USSR fell, to Russia. Ukraine also joined the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT).
Sure they did something, they started a war.
* Killing people is bad.
* Killing lots of people is very, very bad.
* Nuclear weapons are very, very bad, because they kill lots of people.
* Wars are very, very bad because they kill lots of people.
So, Starting wars, and having nukes, are very, very, very bad.
Therefore, Don and Pete are...???
Should the also be stored in plastic bags and thrown out if they start getting moldy?
But But
Quote:The IAEA report, leaked to Western media late last month, concluded that Iran now possesses over 400 kg of 60%-enriched uranium—enough, if further enriched, to build approximately 10 nuclear weapons. The report also cited ongoing Iranian non-cooperation on safeguards and expressed “serious concern” over the country’s continued enrichment at levels with “no civilian justification.”
Tehran releases explanatory note defending 60% enrichment Jun 7, 2025
51 |
4,054 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(05-27-2026, 11:35 PM)Truthhurts Wrote: The Trump era is marked by the highest level of blatant corruption seen in American history.
The Trump era is uncovering leftist corruption not seen in American history.
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
51 |
4,054 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(05-28-2026, 09:51 AM)Oldcarpy2 Wrote: "Everyone"?!
Himself and Israel, to be exact.
I'm glad someone is looking out for Israel, because no one else is.
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
6 |
1,548 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(05-28-2026, 09:54 AM)govshill2 Wrote: But But
Still not weapons grade.
27.8 kg of weapons grade (90% enriched) Uranium could produce a low-yield first-generation nuclear device (according to the IAEA).
However, 60% enriched Uranium is insufficient to produce any devices.
Enriching 400 kg of Uranium from 60% enriched, to 90% enriched, would optimally yield about 255 kg, however, in the real-world, you could expect significant losses which would mean fewer final devices.
So, 9, or most probably fewer, low-yield first-generation nuclear devices - on paper.
51 |
4,054 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(05-28-2026, 07:34 PM)chr0naut Wrote: Still not weapons grade.
27.8 kg of weapons grade (90% enriched) Uranium could produce a low-yield first-generation nuclear device (according to the IAEA).
However, 60% enriched Uranium is insufficient to produce any devices.
Enriching 400 kg of Uranium from 60% enriched, to 90% enriched, would optimally yield about 255 kg, however, in the real-world, you could expect significant losses which would mean fewer final devices.
So, 9, or most probably fewer, low-yield first-generation nuclear devices - on paper.
Maybe in Kiwiland they never heard of dirty bombs.
Might want to google that.
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
0 |
231 |
| JOINED: |
Jan 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(05-28-2026, 09:49 AM)govshill2 Wrote: Perfect way to cover classified information. 
So, it looks like you’re going to stick with the old 3-D chess explanation.
|