307 |
6,505 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

Little bit of bullshit, but he makes some points... plays into the only way Trump became President was the perfect moment in time, coming off Barack's 2nd term, Hillary and the DNC hoped Trump would win, but they didnt believe it was possible till it was too late.
I don't think there is another moment in our history where Trump would have been the RNC's choice; hell, they had no other option.
Paul White Gold Eagle
@PaulGoldEagle
The treatment of President Trump tells you more about the system than it does about him…
Because people disagree with politicians every day..
They argue.
They vote.
They move on.
But the reaction to Donald Trump has never been normal disagreement..
It has been obsession.
Constant.
Aggressive.
Coordinated.
Like the entire machine cannot rest until he is erased.
And that should make any rational person ask:
Why?
Here’s the uncomfortable truth:
Trump is not treated like a threat because he is “too extreme.”
He is treated like a threat because he did not come through the proper door.
He did not climb the approved ladder.
He did not speak in polished scripts.
He did not depend on legacy media to survive.
He did not behave like a controlled product.
And in Washington, that is the one thing you are not allowed to be:
unmanaged.
Trump did not just break decorum.
He broke the agreement.
The unspoken agreement is simple:
Say the right things.
Protect the right people.
Respect the right institutions.
Never expose how the system actually works.
Trump did.
And once the illusion cracks, people start noticing the strings.
That is when the panic starts.
Because the media coverage was never just “negative.”
It was maintenance.
Every headline.
Every cycle.
Every angle.
Not just “hold him accountable.”
Make him toxic.
Every day.
No matter what.
And when coverage stays hostile no matter what happens, that stops looking like journalism.
That starts looking like programming.
Then came the years of investigations, impeachment cycles, special counsels, legal warfare, and nonstop saturation.
And people are still expected to believe this is all just normal?
Be serious.
If the worst accusations had actually landed, he would have been finished years ago.
But what stayed alive were not receipts.
What stayed alive were headlines.
Because headlines are easier to manufacture than proof.
That is why this matters.
You do not have to like Trump.
You do not have to defend every sentence.
You do not have to agree with every move.
But if you still think the reaction to him has been normal, you are ignoring reality.
Because if Trump were just another politician…
they would not treat him like a national emergency.
They do not fear him because he threatens your freedom.
They fear him because he threatens their protection.
Faith. Family. Freedom.
Truth over propaganda.
Courage over conformity.
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
2 |
3,536 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

(04-05-2026, 11:34 AM)putnam6 Wrote: Little bit of bullshit, but he makes some points... plays into the only way Trump became President was the perfect moment in time, coming off Barack's 2nd term, Hillary and the DNC hoped Trump would win, but they didnt believe it was possible till it was too late.
I don't think there is another moment in our history where Trump would have been the RNC's choice; hell, they had no other option.
Paul White Gold Eagle
@PaulGoldEagle
The treatment of President Trump tells you more about the system than it does about him…
Because people disagree with politicians every day..
They argue.
They vote.
They move on.
But the reaction to Donald Trump has never been normal disagreement..
It has been obsession.
Constant.
Aggressive.
Coordinated.
Like the entire machine cannot rest until he is erased.
And that should make any rational person ask:
Why?
Here’s the uncomfortable truth:
Trump is not treated like a threat because he is “too extreme.”
He is treated like a threat because he did not come through the proper door.
He did not climb the approved ladder.
He did not speak in polished scripts.
He did not depend on legacy media to survive.
He did not behave like a controlled product.
And in Washington, that is the one thing you are not allowed to be:
unmanaged.
Trump did not just break decorum.
He broke the agreement.
The unspoken agreement is simple:
Say the right things.
Protect the right people.
Respect the right institutions.
Never expose how the system actually works.
Trump did.
And once the illusion cracks, people start noticing the strings.
That is when the panic starts.
Because the media coverage was never just “negative.”
It was maintenance.
Every headline.
Every cycle.
Every angle.
Not just “hold him accountable.”
Make him toxic.
Every day.
No matter what.
And when coverage stays hostile no matter what happens, that stops looking like journalism.
That starts looking like programming.
Then came the years of investigations, impeachment cycles, special counsels, legal warfare, and nonstop saturation.
And people are still expected to believe this is all just normal?
Be serious.
If the worst accusations had actually landed, he would have been finished years ago.
But what stayed alive were not receipts.
What stayed alive were headlines.
Because headlines are easier to manufacture than proof.
That is why this matters.
You do not have to like Trump.
You do not have to defend every sentence.
You do not have to agree with every move.
But if you still think the reaction to him has been normal, you are ignoring reality.
Because if Trump were just another politician…
they would not treat him like a national emergency.
They do not fear him because he threatens your freedom.
They fear him because he threatens their protection.
Faith. Family. Freedom.
Truth over propaganda.
Courage over conformity.
That was the narrative during Trump's 1st term
At that time it was believable
But it's simply not believable, anymore
Now Trump is Mask Off
8 |
648 |
| JOINED: |
Feb 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(04-05-2026, 09:55 AM)cherokeetroy Wrote: That's the only article I was able to find as well
I'm seeing debate over whether it's official withdrawl or a precautionary measure
"Qatar’s Foreign Minister, in rare remarks on Wednesday evening, stated: “Qatar has paid a heavy price for hosting foreign bases. Our relationship with Iran is fraternal, and we will not allow harm to come through Qatari soil again”
These comments follow repeated attacks on Al-Udeid, the largest U.S. base in the Middle East, which have damaged some equipment. Earlier reports indicated that the U.S. had already evacuated hundreds of personnel from the base to safer locations"
https://x.com/MohamadShamass/status/2038...30249?s=20
Is dwindling support in the middle east a good sign?
So much for a coalition of the willing.
13 |
215 |
| JOINED: |
Jan 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(04-05-2026, 11:34 AM)putnam6 Wrote: Because headlines are easier to manufacture than proof.
That is why this matters.
You do not have to like Trump.
You do not have to defend every sentence.
You do not have to agree with every move.
But if you still think the reaction to him has been normal, you are ignoring reality.
Because if Trump were just another politician…
they would not treat him like a national emergency.
They do not fear him because he threatens your freedom.
They fear him because he threatens their protection.
Faith. Family. Freedom.
Truth over propaganda.
Courage over conformity.
I tend to second that motion in your post. If anything, Donald Trump's biggest crime to the EU elite is he is not a direct descendent of British or French royalty. Now the Europeans always try to play this down, but is also why many accused the EU of shadow running the USA, especially after Bretton Woods. The European Royals, by not having a direct descendent in charge of America, have defacto lost political control of the USA. However, that is not a discussion for this thread, but I would gladly join any thread discussing such a topic.
I will try my best to just stick to physical updates regarding this PG3 war.
17 |
5,564 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

(04-05-2026, 11:58 AM)worldstarcountry Wrote: I tend to second that motion in your post. If anything, Donald Trump's biggest crime to the EU elite is he is not a direct descendent of British or French royalty. Now the Europeans always try to play this down, but is also why many accused the EU of shadow running the USA, especially after Bretton Woods. The European Royals, by not having a direct descendent in charge of America, have defacto lost political control of the USA. However, that is not a discussion for this thread, but I would gladly join any thread discussing such a topic.
I will try my best to just stick to physical updates regarding this PG3 war.
Start a thread sbout our evil Royals and I will be happy to discuss it.
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope. Nothing...
2 |
3,536 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

(04-05-2026, 11:52 AM)IDELB2006 Wrote: Is dwindling support in the middle east a good sign?
So much for a coalition of the willing.
It's ridiculous how some still attempt to portray Trump as a hapless victim...
'The Underdog'
When he's obviously not
He's a disgusting degenerate
No different than his Democrat associates who are benefiting from his protection
0 |
240 |
| JOINED: |
Jan 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(04-05-2026, 10:41 AM)andy06shake Wrote: ......
Turn it around the other way.
Say Iran managed to wipe out Trump, his family, and destroy the White House.
Does anyone really imagine JD Vance would be up for talking about peace and surrender a month down the line?
.....
Yes. I do. That would have done Vance a favor by giving him the presidency he wants and give him an opportunity to get out of the endless mideast war that he doesn't want. It would be win-win for him.
13 |
215 |
| JOINED: |
Jan 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(04-05-2026, 12:03 PM)Oldcarpy2 Wrote: Start a thread sbout our evil Royals and I will be happy to discuss it.
I probably should because there was a court ruling out of Belgium recently that treats something that happened in the Congo in 1961 as a war crime and changes an official state wording of the incident, which has led to a ruling in favor of the descendent of the overthrown regime at that time against Belgium or its royal family I cannot recall. I did not read the whole thing, I was looking for Iran data.
That could lead to a cascading chain reaction on every regime change since Bilderberg started its centralized management attempt of the planet after WW2 .
110 |
6,066 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(04-05-2026, 12:15 PM)EXETER Wrote: Yes. I do. That would have done Vance a favor by giving him the presidency he wants and give him an opportunity to get out of the endless mideast war that he doesn't want. It would be win-win for him.
I see the reasoning.
Vance is not Trump through.
Could he sell it to the public?
An assassinated POTUS, his family, and no more White House.
I'm doubtful...
They would be apt to demand revenge in spades...
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
0 |
240 |
| JOINED: |
Jan 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(04-05-2026, 11:52 AM)IDELB2006 Wrote: Is dwindling support in the middle east a good sign?
So much for a coalition of the willing.
It's a good sign for Iran. Many of these small Arab Gulf States are extremely vulnerable and therefore extremely susceptible to blackmail. Qatar, for example, gets about 80% of its GDP from liquified natural gas and helium exports. Now that that has stopped, they are going to go broke pretty fast. They get about 99% of their drinking water from desalination. Take out their desalination plants with drones and short-range ballistic missiles and Qatar becomes uninhabitable almost instantly. Their total military force is about 20,000.
That's why they allowed the US to put the Al Udeid air base there in the first place--for the US to be their protector. This move means they've decided Trump can not or will not protect them, so they are cutting a deal with the one they think will be the winner.
|