Trump says he bombed Iran

[FlyersFan]

Tell people they can't have something, and they are only going to want it more.

Doesn't mean that you give it to them when it's bad for them and for 
the entire planet.   You give them something else to want more ... 
like MONEY and COMMERCE and WEALTH ...   That's what Trump did 
when he went to the Middle East last year and his slogan on the trip
was 'commerce, not chaos'.  ANd it worked.  Now those countries are
more interested in money and standard of living rather than being 
buddies with Iran which causes chaos.

I don't like the guy.   He's up to his eyeballs in the Epstein thing and 
he's a serial adulterer and disparages women, acts like a baby,
etc etc (list could go on).   But sometimes he does things right, and 
his 'commerce not chaos' tour was one of those 'right' things.

[Kurokage]

Cuz' Iran says we are.
Death to America.  Death to Israel.   Death to their alliles.
You should take them at their word.
They are advertising what they intend to do.

They've been saying that for over 40 years and we're all still here.

I'm not naïve, I know the second that Iran gets enough fissile material they're more than likely to try to strike Israel or give it's proxies a dirty bomb, but now Trump has given the Iranian hardliners a good reason and with friends like Putin, the chances of a dirty bomb is far more likely now.

[andy06shake]

Doesn't mean that you give it to them when it's bad for them and for 
the entire planet.   You give them something else to want more ... 
like MONEY and COMMERCE and WEALTH ...   That's what Trump did 
when he went to the Middle East last year and his slogan on the trip
was 'commerce, not chaos'.  ANd it worked.  Now those countries are
more interested in money and standard of living rather than being 
buddies with Iran which causes chaos.

I don't like the guy.   He's up to his eyeballs in the Epstein thing and 
he's a serial adulterer and disparages women, acts like a baby,
etc etc (list could go on).   But sometimes he does things right, and 
his 'commerce not chaos' tour was one of those 'right' things.

They don't need you to give them anything.

But if you keep on bombing the crap out of them and killing their leaders from afar.

You will simply bring about the very thing you wish to prevent.

Unless you choose to wipe them from the planet.

Good luck with that.

Again its apt to end tears. 

Not that Trump will be around to weep them.

[putnam6]

Several months ago the US crashed Iran's money and it was replaced with an emergency UBI in digital currency 

My opinion is the overarching goal is to collapse the entire legacy geopolitical economic structure 

It's outdated, it's slow, it's broken

It can't keep pace with the technological advancements they want to achieve 

The old world has to be demolished so they can rebuild a new world order

They have used wars throughout history to do this

Destroy then rebuild

That's what keeps them rich and powerful 

If they are planning to collapse our currency, just like they did Iran

Then Trump will instill executive order to issue stablecoins as an emergency measure

Isn't that like step 1000, and we are just now in the double digits at best?
How close to reality is it within 3 years or is it still years away?

How can Trump have the authority to use emergency powers on such a scale when he can't even get the FED to lower interest rates?

No way that occurs with such a divided Congress/MSM and public, doing so would slash the Republicans' already slim margin for error in the midterms and 2028

I took the liberty of getting some background by asking Grok

Grok's thoughts

Hearing rumors that some think the overarching goal is to collapse the entire legacy geopolitical economic structure 
It's outdated, it's slow, it's broken
It can't keep pace with the technological advancements they want to achieve 
The old world has to be demolished so they can rebuild a new world order
They have used wars throughout history to do this
Destroy then rebuild
That's what keeps them rich and powerful 
If they are planning to collapse our currency, just like they did Iran
Then Trump will instill executive order to issue stablecoins as an emergency measure


Ah, the classic "destroy to rebuild" narrative—it's got that dramatic flair, doesn't it?

Rumors like this have been swirling for years, often tying into fears of elite machinations, de-dollarization, and tectonic shifts in global power.
Let's unpack this step by step, drawing on what's actually happening as of early 2026, without diving into pure speculation. I'll stick to verifiable developments around Trump, stablecoins, currency stability, and broader geopolitical vibes.

The "Collapse the Old System" Angle
You're spot on that history is littered with wars and crises being used (or accused of being used) to reshape economies and power structures. Think post-WWII Bretton Woods, or how the 1971 Nixon Shock ended the gold standard and cemented the petrodollar. Critics often point to entities like central banks, multinational corps, or even shadowy groups as orchestrators of "controlled demolitions" to usher in new orders. In today's context, with AI, blockchain, and quantum tech accelerating, the legacy financial system (think SWIFT, endless intermediaries, and fiat vulnerabilities) does feel clunky and exposed to disruptions like inflation, sanctions, or cyber threats.
But is there an active plot to tank the whole thing? No hard evidence from recent searches points to a coordinated "collapse" agenda by "they" (whoever that is—globalists, BRICS, WEF?). Instead, tensions are real: BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, plus expansions) have been pushing for alternatives to USD dominance, like trading in local currencies or gold-backed systems, partly to dodge US sanctions. Iran’s rial has indeed plummeted—down over 90% in value since 2018 due to US sanctions, oil export curbs, and internal mismanagement—serving as a cautionary tale for how weaponized finance can cripple economies. Yet, this isn't framed as a blueprint for deliberate US currency sabotage; it's more about geopolitical leverage.
The Stablecoins and Trump Connection
Now, the juicy part: Your theory about Trump stepping in with an executive order for stablecoins as an "emergency measure" isn't far off from reality, but it's proactive rather than reactive to a collapse. Trump, back in the White House after 2024, has gone full throttle on crypto to "make America the undisputed leader in digital assets."

• Executive Order on Digital Assets (Jan 23, 2025): This EO, titled "Strengthening American Leadership in Digital Financial Technology," promotes blockchain and digital assets across the economy. It explicitly backs "lawful and legitimate dollar-backed stablecoins" to protect USD sovereignty and counters de-dollarization threats. It also bans federal agencies from pursuing Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), calling them a risk to privacy and stability—no "digital dollar" under Uncle Sam's direct control. This sets up stablecoins (like USDT or USDC, pegged 1:1 to USD and backed by reserves like Treasuries) as the go-to for fast, cheap global transactions, potentially replacing clunky systems like SWIFT.

• The GENIUS Act (Signed July 18, 2025): This is the big legislative win—short for "Guaranteeing Essential National Infrastructure in US-Stablecoins." It creates the first federal regulatory framework for stablecoins, ensuring they're backed by real assets (USD, Treasuries, etc.), prioritizes consumer protections, and positions them to boost demand for US debt. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent called it a "revolution" that makes the dollar "internet-native" for frictionless global payments. The OCC (Office of the Comptroller of the Currency) even dropped implementation proposals in February 2026 to let banks and firms issue regulated stablecoins.

In essence, this isn't about responding to a US currency crash (which hasn't happened—the dollar's still king, holding ~58% of global reserves). It's about fortifying it against rivals. Trump himself has touted how stablecoins kill BRICS' anti-dollar dreams by locking in USD hegemony through tech. Analysts argue it could "reboot" America's "exorbitant privilege" (borrowing cheap because everyone wants dollars).
Rebuilding a "New World Order"?

If the old system's "demolished," stablecoins could indeed pave the way for a rebuilt one: decentralized, blockchain-based, with the US at the helm. Proponents see it as empowering individuals (no more bank gatekeepers), while skeptics worry about surveillance, volatility (remember TerraUSD's 2022 implosion?), or elites consolidating control via tech. Geopolitically, it's a power play—stablecoins could deepen "dollarization" worldwide, even in sanctioned spots like Iran or Gaza (there's talk of a USD-backed stablecoin for Gaza's economy).

Rumors on X echo your vibe: Some users frame the GENIUS Act as Trump's masterstroke to save the dollar from collapse and usher in a "new financial system" by 2030. Others liken it to post-Civil War coinage driving out "bad money," with stablecoins as the new "good" backed by real-world assets. But no widespread chatter about an imminent US currency flop or Iran-style takedown—more excitement about crypto's rise.

Bottom line: These moves look like fortification, not demolition. If a crisis hits (say, hyperinflation or a major war), stablecoins could indeed serve as the emergency bridge, per your theory.

But right now, it's all about staying ahead in the tech arms race. If you've got more details on those rumors, hit me with 'em—could be fun to dig deeper.

[Oldcarpy2]

Apparently, the CIA had intel that the beardy little sh*t was in his compound gathered with his senior staff that morning, passed that to the Israelis and the decision to strike was made.


Not planned in advance.

Bit stupid having all those leaders in one place.

[Kurokage]

Just a reminder….

Muslim countries that support today's U.S strike on Iran: Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, UAE, Bahrain.

Muslim countries that DO NOT support today's U.S. strike on Iran: France, United Kingdom.

Grow up

Please post the evidence for your childish claims.

Most of the middle eastern countries you listed have around a 20% Shiite muslim population. Do you think they aren't angry?? Are you that gullible??

Then there's the trashing of U.S. embassies all across the middle east, this is only going to push muslim radicals to create home grown terrorists in the west

[andy06shake]

Isn't that like step 1000, and we are just now in the double digits at best?
How close to reality is it within 3 years or is it still years away?

How can Trump have the authority to use emergency powers on such a scale when he can't even get the FED to lower interest rates?

No way that occurs with such a divided Congress/MSM and public, doing so would slash the Republicans' already slim margin for error in the midterms and 2028

I took the liberty of getting some background by asking Grok

Grok's thoughts

My thinking on the matter is that given that the economic elites and 1%ers are deeply invested in stability.

Collapsing the major currencies would seem to harm them just as much as it would everybody else.

Canny milk the cows if you kill them afterall...

[putnam6]

Yes, the Trumps have figured out how to rake in through crypto

As many others have, this is what American politicians do, (see Pelosi and others )and likely most international politicians do.

Obama's 800 million dollar library in Chi-town and the city can't even afford to keep Da Bears, comes to mind.

Unfortunately, many humans have this greed streak

[Kurokage]

On the surface that's true.  But one layer deeper shows that this
military action is actually stopping a nuclear war in the future.

I'm more likely to think Putin as a last resort in losing his dictatorship, would launch a tactical nuke, then possibly North Korea, long before I'd say Iran.
They prefer being a step back from the terrorism by using their proxies.

Do I think they have it in them?  Of course I do, but I think other scenarios are more likely before that.

[putnam6]

Doesn't mean that you give it to them when it's bad for them and for 
the entire planet.   You give them something else to want more ... 
like MONEY and COMMERCE and WEALTH ...   That's what Trump did 
when he went to the Middle East last year and his slogan on the trip
was 'commerce, not chaos'.  ANd it worked.  Now those countries are
more interested in money and standard of living rather than being 
buddies with Iran which causes chaos.

I don't like the guy.   He's up to his eyeballs in the Epstein thing and 
he's a serial adulterer and disparages women, acts like a baby,
etc etc (list could go on).   But sometimes he does things right, and 
his 'commerce not chaos' tour was one of those 'right' things.

100% mentioned before, Ive never been enamored with any of our Presidents. Currently have Trump at about a 53% putnam6 approval rating. Hell,I don't think any President got over 60% and certainly not in thier second term maybe Reagan or Dubya after 9/11


Have you found your landing spot message board-wise?