Trump says he bombed Iran

[Oldcarpy2]

It doesn't end in the Muslim world

Take the Epstein class, for instance..

Please, take them.  Down.

[cherokeetroy]

"It looks like Laos is truly the first wave of what’s likely going to roll out globally to everyone soon enough.

The tip of the spear.

Just like COVID, this is starting in East Asia first but will impact the entire world.

This is basically slow moving COVID."

https://x.com/okaythenfuture/status/2035...86154?s=20

https://x.com/FmrRepMTG/status/2035382269532045491?s=20




The International Energy Agency released a 10-point plan telling governments to restrict driving, ground flights, force remote work, and ban gas cooking. They called it "Sheltering from Oil Shocks." 

https://www.iea.org/reports/sheltering-from-oil-shocks

1/ Alternating driving days based on your license plate number. Odd plates drive Monday. Even plates drive Tuesday. Countries are already implementing this. This is not a suggestion. It is the architecture of a permit system for movement. 

2/ Mandatory speed limit reductions on every highway. Not safety. Fuel rationing by another name. You can still drive. Just slower, less often, and only when the government says your plate number qualifies. 

3/ Avoid air travel "where alternatives exist." The IEA does not define what qualifies as an alternative. A 12-hour train ride? A video call? The ambiguity is the feature. It lets regulators decide after the fact whether your trip was essential. 

4/ Switch from gas cooking to electric. The IEA is now telling you what appliance to use in your own kitchen. The same agency that published "Net Zero by 2050" calling for thermostats capped at 19 degrees and a ban on new gas boilers. This is not new. It is accelerating. 

5/ Work from home "where possible."

In 2020 they locked down the world and called it public health. In 2026 they are locking down movement and calling it energy security. The template is identical. The excuse changed. The IEA's own Net Zero roadmap calls for personal behavioral changes modeled on COVID compliance. They said it out loud. "COVID-19 has increased general awareness of how behavioural changes can be effective."

https://x.com/AaronRDay/status/2035333009973383387?s=20

[FlyersFan]

As you ignore the systematic takeover control of the Religious Right in America. 

​​​​​​​
Dialing back the woke nonsense of the Biden regime doesn't mean 'the religious right' are taking over.  It just means that people realized how freak'n stupid 'woke' is and decided that men can't get pregnant afterall.

[CriticalStinker]

Im not telling you to capitulate or what to do, think, or wear. Annie

I don't believe you are a subclass human, like a dog or goat, here to serve males

You know, like the current Iranian regime,the one you are definitely capitulating for.

Don’t we actively support and arm countries there with similar women’s rights?

I don’t think that could be used as a pretext for war or even “liberation”.

Also, it doesn’t look like regime change is a primary objective at this time.

[FlyersFan]

22 countries agree to help keep the Strait open.

HERE

Twenty-two countries have now signed onto a joint statement signaling their "readiness to contribute to appropriate efforts to ensure safe passage" through the Strait of Hormuz.  The growing list, which includes NATO members, comes after President Donald Trump ripped NATO for acting like “cowards” Friday. The president said "they complain about the high oil prices they are forced to pay, but don’t want to help open the Strait of Hormuz."

 
The joint statement said, "We express our readiness to contribute to appropriate efforts to ensure safe passage through the Strait,” and, “We welcome the commitment of nations who are engaging in preparatory planning.”
The statement is attributed to the leaders of the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Japan, Canada, Republic of Korea, New Zealand, Denmark, Latvia, Slovenia, Estonia, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Czechia, Romania, Bahrain, Lithuania, Australia and the United Arab Emirates.

 
“We condemn in the strongest terms recent attacks by Iran on unarmed commercial vessels in the Gulf, attacks on civilian infrastructure including oil and gas installations, and the de facto closure of the Strait of Hormuz by Iranian forces,” the statement also said.  “We express our deep concern about the escalating conflict. We call on Iran to cease immediately its threats, laying of mines, drone and missile attacks and other attempts to block the Strait to commercial shipping, and to comply with UN Security Council Resolution 2817,” the statement continued, referencing a resolution passed last week that spoke out against Iran’s recent actions.

[Oldcarpy2]

Don’t we actively support and arm countries there with similar women’s rights?

I don’t think that could be used as a pretext for war or even “liberation”.

Also, it doesn’t look like regime change is a primary objective at this time.

The Gulf states don't exactly have good records on that.

Also, Saudi did 9/11, so there is that, too.

[cherokeetroy]

Please, take them.  Down.

Yes, we probably should

But the EC is busy at the moment 

Saving Iranian women and children 

If I don't support them, I'm anti-American

[ANNEE]

Im not telling you to capitulate or what to do, think, or wear. Annie

I don't believe you are a subclass human, like a dog or goat, here to serve males

You know, like the current Iranian regime, the one you are definitely capitulating to.

How interesting — that no matter what I say. 

You interpret it as supporting the Iran regime.

[cherokeetroy]

Multiple reports 

"Iran claims direct missile hit on Dimona nuclear site Ballistic missile reportedly landed in the area with multiple injuries, alleged but unconfirmed so far.

If true, this crosses a massive red line."

Source: RN Intel

https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/2035402...09670?s=20

https://x.com/BinsaeedRashid/status/2035...95206?s=20

https://x.com/AlonLeeGreen/status/203540...64990?s=20

[ANNEE]

Yes, we probably should

But the EC is busy at the moment 

Saving Iranian women and children 

If I don't support them, I'm anti-American

Changing a culture is one of the hardest things in the world to do. I remember in regards to Iraq discussions about Russia’s failure because they couldn’t conquer culture/ideology. 

And it isn’t just the women. It’s a generational hierarchy. The men are also subject to elders. A man can’t free his wife/daughters if he himself is not free. 

But the culture continues here in America “Land of the Free”. We have honor killings here in America. The culture/ideology is far more deep rooted than just “women’s rights”. 

Back to war — war is economical.  Power - control - money (in whatever order you choose). 

So here’s the question:  what rights does one country have to demand power over another?