Trump's defamation suit against the media backfires

[RazorV66]

Too bad the US is still so Christian Patriarchal that a woman wasn't elected.

That's pretty stupid.

[Oldcarpy2]

Wanna' address my question?

If the BBC did a national story on you, OldCarpy, and it was all a lie with the purpose of causing harm to your reputation and making it so that you couldn't work in the job you wanted .... which is what they did to Trump .... would you be defending their 'right' to do this to you?    Wouldn't you want to punish them and make them stop doing it to people?

Yes.  If it was in our jurisdiction.

Blimey.

[KrustyKrab]

I know Trump's Epstein connection  is awfull and Matt Gaetz being a nonce and all.
 

That recording of Trump boasting about going into underage pagent locker rooms was terrible  right? 

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/po...se-191860/



yes why would anyone  support a creep like Trump?


Though I wouldn't  trust the democrats  either.

#1. Trump had nothing to do with Epstein’s trafficking business. 

#2. They’re not underage. You have to be 18 to become Miss America which means they’re adults.

[FlyersFan]

Blimey.

   Why the 'blimey'?   I'm your buddy.   The 'friends' list on the profile says so.  

[KrustyKrab]

Yes.  If it was in our jurisdiction.

Blimey.

It’s not out of jurisdiction.  The battle will be the interpretation of UK & US defamation law and freedom of the press law. Those were the hurdles I read about yesterday.   Perfectly legal for an American to sue the BBC.

[chivo]

Hypocrisy. It's ok for the BBC, the most important and traditional news outlet in the world to report fake biased news, because TRUMP!! 
And is also ok that trump lawsuit will not work because of jurisdiction and "this is how the legal system is" (corrupted to the core).

Say it with me mates and karens... TEE, DEEE, ESSSS!!! get help please
"Hypocrisy is Lying's bitter, gossipy auntie"

[Kurokage]

The article I posted wasn't actually about Trumps lawsuit against the BBC.

This stems from the articles posted by 'The Washington Post' and 'New York Times' about supposed Russian collusion. Trump pursued a defamation lawsuit against the Pulitzer Prize Board after they rejected his demands to rescind 2018 prizes awarded to the news outlets.

From one of the articles I posted.

After Trump demanded the prizes be rescinded, the Pulitzer board commissioned two independent reviews and issued a 2022 statement explaining that the reviews showed no aspects of the reporting were refuted by Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s findings. Mueller’s investigation did not ultimately allege conspiracy between Trump’s 2016 campaign and Russia, though the special counsel’s report identified “numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump campaign”.

 
Trump’s lawsuit claims the board’s statement:

• Perpetuated the “Russia Collusion Hoax” as factual
  
• Falsely represented that independent reviews validated the accuracy of the reporting
  
• Left readers with the defamatory impression that Trump colluded with Russia
  
• Damaged his reputation and business interests
  
• Was made with actual malice or reckless disregard for truth
  

The Pulitzer Prize board's legal team have asked for these documents with in 30 days...
 

All of Trump’s tax returns from all jurisdictions, including attachments, schedules, and worksheets, from 2015 to present
Documents showing all sources of Trump’s income from 2015 to present
Documents showing all of Trump’s financial holdings and liabilities
Internal polling Trump conducted on himself to gauge his reputation
Documents regarding all gifts and compensation he’s received since 2015
Health records and prescription medication history

to show whether his claims in the lawsuit of damaging his reputation, business interests, and also claims of mental and physical anguish caused by the story are accurate.

[quintessentone]

The article I posted wasn't actually about Trumps lawsuit against the BBC.

This stems from the articles posted by 'The Washington Post' and 'New York Times' about supposed Russian collusion. Trump pursued a defamation lawsuit against the Pulitzer Prize Board after they rejected his demands to rescind 2018 prizes awarded to the news outlets.

From one of the articles I posted.

The Pulitzer Prize board's legal team have asked for these documents with in 30 days...
 

to show whether his claims in the lawsuit of damaging his reputation, business interests, and also claims of mental and physical anguish caused by the story are accurate.

It's about time Trump was put on the spot to prove his claims and not rely on those he sues to back down, as most do just to save money from long and deliberately delayed court cases, which, as we have learned from Michael Wolff, will end Trump lawsuits in their tracks.

[Oldcarpy2]

   Why the 'blimey'?   I'm your buddy.   The 'friends' list on the profile says so.  

I know.  We're all good.

[KrustyKrab]

It’s pathetic that people would be against Trump wanting to defend himself when they’re getting Pulitzer Prizes for pushing a gd hoax on the guy.  That to me is complete insanity and stupid af, especially the people that think that’s okay.  Stupid is a stupid does.