The Ten Commandments and the changed Roman Catholic version

[Creaky]

Catholic councils, hun.
There were no other Christian churches back in the 300s.
The ones in charge were the Catholics.  Pope and all.
No orthodox, no lutherans, no methodist ....

No, no Lutherans, no orthodox, no methodists but, the church wasn’t born in Europe.
There were other christian denominations outside of Romes authority

[Creaky]

... which created the bible.

You are sooo insincere, you are just trying to grab all the glory 
Very common for denominatianilism , like yours 
Why I fear the “Roman’s”, no humility, just greed, self worship and power

[FlyersFan]

You are sooo insincere, you are just trying to grab all the glory 
Very common for denominatianilism , like yours 
Why I fear the “Roman’s”, no humility, just greed, self worship and power

Being sure of what I'm saying isn't 'insecurity'.
Nor is it 'no humility, self worship, greed and power'.
You are comical.  

[UltraBudgie]

this is the point where i think i see the thread starting to spiral

and i patheticlaly attempt to interject a funny comment


haha!

can we at least all agree about the mormons?

[FlyersFan]

this is the point where i think i see the thread starting to spiral

and i patheticlaly attempt to interject a funny comment


haha!

can we at least all agree about the mormons?

  I'm just posting to 'poke the bear'.
The author of this thread has been going around saying Catholics are all liars and hellbound.
(and anyone who disagrees with him)
Three threads of it.
So I figured I'd post a bunch of Catholic point of view to annoy him.  

I lived in Alabama for 9 years. 
Had to put up with people like him knocking on the door all the time.
Fundamentalists who said everyone except those in their own belief system were going to hell.
I used to entertain myself by quoting scripture back at them, or history books, 
and getting them all upset because their rehearsed propaganda was stepped on.

[Bootless]

can we at least all agree about the mormons?

I'm a bit rusty on the Book of Mormon, but I remember there was a passage that prophesied the arrival of the Europeans (Gentiles), and they would have two books called the Old and New Testaments.

That prophecy was fulfilled so it must be all true.
-----------
It's probably one of those referenced in this piece that I cut and paste:

The Promised Land and Its Covenant Peoples
 At least four groups of covenant people have settled the American continent: the Antediluvians, from Adam to Noah; the people of Jared, called Jaredites; the Lehites and Mulekites; and the present inhabitants of the land, the Gentiles. [1] The Book of Mormon contains an account of the latter three immigrant groups and notes that the Lord’s promise to each colony appears to have been the same: serve the God of the land, who is Jesus Christ, and prosper on the land (Ether 2:8; 2 Nephi 1:9). If the inhabitants choose evil, they will be “swept off the face of the land.

And now, we can behold the decrees of God concerning this land, that it is a land of promise; and whatsoever nation shall possess it shall serve God, or they shall be swept off when the fulness of his wrath shall come upon them. And the fulness of his wrath cometh upon them when they are ripened in iniquity. (Ether 2:9; see also 1 Nephi 2:20; 2 Nephi 1:6–11)

This dominant theme—America is a covenant land reserved for a people who will have Jesus Christ (Jehovah) to be their God—appears again and again in the Book of Mormon. For example, the Jaredite account proclaims this continent to be a “land of promise . . . choice above all other lands which the Lord God had preserved for a righteous people” (Ether 2:7). Lehi reminded his family in a final discourse that the Lord had led them to a “land of promise” (2 Nephi 1:3). The Lord promised Nephi that if he kept the commandments he would be “led to a land of promise; yea, even a land which I have prepared for you; yea, a land which is choice above all other lands” (1 Nephi 2:20).

The Book of Mormon clearly outlines a pattern of the inhabitants settling in the promised land, of establishing laws to maintain political and moral standards, and of God’s covenanting to protect and bless them if they will uphold spiritual and political laws. Unfortunately, the first three civilizations failed to maintain their covenants and standards, and their tragic cycles concluded with each one “ripening in iniquity” and being “swept off the land. The Jaredites and Nephites passed through a number of stages from the time of their arrival in the promised land until they were ripened in iniquity and destroyed. The Gentiles who now occupy the land, have not yet completed all the stages.

This chapter identifies the covenants between God and the land’s inhabitants and then discusses how they fared. The primary focus, however, will be the Nephites’ passage through ten stages of decline, which are particularly clear in the book of Helaman and the first chapters of 3 Nephi. It will note, briefly, similarities between the Nephite decline and the decline of the other occupants of the land and give some observations on the Lamanites. Summary comments on the future of the Gentiles will conclude the paper.

Looks like the LDS had Christian Nationalism in mind from the get go.

Can't we just be a Liberal Democracy for crying out loud?

[FlyersFan]

Can't we just be a Liberal Democracy for crying out loud?

Democracy yes.   Liberal no.
I don't subscribe to the trans gender bending ideology of the liberals.
I don't subscribe to fundamentalist Christianity Democracy either.
So no one suggest that either.

[quintessentone]

Can't learn about Jesus from false sources.
All you do is learn about fictional stories.
It convolutes and distracts from the actual teachings.

I know you don't believe what you posted.

[FlyersFan]

I know you don't believe what you posted.

You can't learn about people in history by reading fake historical fiction stories written hundreds of years later, and that has been condemned by experts as fake and wrong.  It's not real and it's not accurate.  DUH.  Common sense.

You are what you eat.  You eat garbage food it'll make you fat and sick.  Same with this.  You feed your brain garbage that is fake then it messes up your mind and you start believing the fake instead of what is real.

Fiction written hundreds of years after the events aren't real.  

COMMON SENSE.   DUH.

[quintessentone]

You can't learn about people in history by reading fake historical fiction stories written hundreds of years later, and that has been condemned by experts as fake and wrong.  It's not real and it's not accurate.  DUH.  Common sense.

You are what you eat.  You eat garbage food it'll make you fat and sick.  Same with this.  You feed your brain garbage that is fake then it messes up your mind and you start believing the fake instead of what is real.

Fiction written hundreds of years after the events aren't real.  

COMMON SENSE.   DUH.

Some would call all the gospels bound together with all it's contradictions and as being fiction, such as the contradiction of how the women acted after visiting Jesus' tomb; Luke 24:9, Mark 16:8.

Common sense does not play any part here.