Release All Files! - Part 2

[Oldcarpy2]

1.  Ghislaine Maxwell, serving time after conviction.  British.
2.  Andrew Mountbatten Windsor.  Stripped of his titles.  British.
3.  Peter Mandelson.  Kicked out of Labour Party, about to be stripped of his Peerage and being prosecuted for malfeasance in public office.  British.

Anyone paid for Epstein stuff as a US citizen?

Anyone, at all?

[Maxmars]

1.  Ghislaine Maxwell, serving time after conviction.  British.
2.  Andrew Mountbatten Windsor.  Stripped of his titles.  British.
3.  Peter Mandelson.  Kicked out of Labour Party, about to be stripped of his Peerage and being prosecuted for malfeasance in public office.  British.

Anyone paid for Epstein stuff as a US citizen?

Anyone, at all?

I'm not thinking the nationalities or even allegiances, shared or not, don't speak to the crime itself.  The punished needn't be the epicenter of the spectacle because all we know has been recorded (presumably.)

I think the "subjects" within the "world" upon which we opine, are distinctly free from interconnection... or are they?  Does the transience of a criminal association absolve oneself from the crimes of 'associates?'

I know you guys are all over this idea...
me?... I just dabble.

People who have 'affirmed' the veracity of the crime with which they were accused would appear naturally well-aligned to 'redeem' their situation... but prosecutors only do that with desperate criminals... but not so much with top-tier elites... 'celebrities.'  That can draw angst and resentment.. especially for those subject to a less 'patient and gentle justice.'

Given the moral magnitude of the crime... can anyone say the sentiment is out of place?  Perhaps.

[ANNEE]

It may take years to sort all this out. 

Epstein was also a businessman — I doubt everyone was involved in his “side hustle”. 

HOWEVER — protection by silence is just as guilty.

[putnam6]

I'm not out to convince you

I'm simply laying out the conclusion based on my own observation 

All we can do is watch as everything continues to unfold

--- I mean, all I  can do is watch the unfolding

Im just discussing the topic,

I listen to your thoughts and others here and then read/research elsewhere,

Then there's this nugget...

https://x.com/i/grok/share/73ff9f75b9364...5f106baa53

" • Lawyers representing over 200 Jeffrey Epstein victims, who lobbied for file disclosures in 2025 while criticizing Trump administration delays, filed motions on February 2, 2026, urging judges to compel the DOJ to remove recently released documents due to thousands of redaction errors exposing victims' names and nude images, as reported by CNN and The New York Times.
• The DOJ's January 2026 release of more than 3 million pages, including videos and emails, cleared Trump of involvement while referencing Democrats like Bill Clinton and others such as Elon Musk, prompting the post's claim of abrupt secrecy demands amid damaging revelations to political opponents.
• This reversal highlights ongoing conflicts between public accountability for Epstein's network and protecting survivors' privacy, with peer-reviewed legal analyses (e.g., in Harvard Law Review) emphasizing how incomplete redactions in high-profile cases risk revictimization without advancing justice."

[Kaiju666]

Just saw some posts on X

it's bad

ETA

I'm not even going to screenshot it

What’s bad? Because Trumps not a customer?

[cherokeetroy]

Once again, Trump infers the crooked Democrats and their donors went to Epstein Island 

His administration intends to do nothing about it?

[ANNEE]

What’s bad? Because Trumps not a customer?

Deny ignorance

[cherokeetroy]

What’s bad? Because Trumps not a customer?

Read Trump's latest "Truth" that I posted above  
Trump calls Epstein Island "infested"
Which conveys his awareness of illegal and/or illicit activity 

Trump says almost all of the crooked Democrats and their donors went to the island 
He didn't say "maybe"
He says "did"

If Trump knows this as fact and he fails to act on his own knowledge or evidence, that makes him complicit 

He is guilty of covering up crime

How do you feel about that?

[Kurokage]

Read Trump's latest "Truth" that I posted above  
Trump calls Epstein Island "infested"
Which conveys his awareness of illegal and/or illicit activity 

Trump says almost all of the crooked Democrats and their donors went to the island 
He didn't say "maybe"
He says "did"

If Trump knows this as fact and he fails to act on his own knowledge or evidence, that makes him complicit 

He is guilty of covering up crime

How do you feel about that?

It reminds me a little of Bohemian Grove. Once they were there, there were no party lines like 'a democrat' or 'republican', no such thing as business rivals. It was all left at the door whilst they fed their disgusting fetishes and sickness.

[UltraBudgie]

Epstein was living with Pope John Paul II at the Vatican???



https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Da...856969.pdf

Hoo-boy...