The only 'no' vote on releasing Epstein files

[BeTheGoddess]

So I guess hes on the list, why else would he vote NO?

 

Nearly every Republican in the US House of Representatives voted on a bill to compel the release of documents tied to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
The lone "nay" came from the Republican lawmaker from Louisiana, Clay Higgins, who defied his party saying his vote was a principled "NO".

The only 'no' vote on releasing Epstein files (msn.com)

EDIT: Heres a reddit thread about it, some of the comments are worthwile

The one and only person who voted no on releasing the Epstein files, Clay Higgins. Why? : conspiracy (reddit.com)

[guyfriday]

Oddly it was confirmed that Schumer, Pelosi, and Warren were on the Island at the same time Epstein was there. Hell, what ever happened to those pictures from the security cameras that showed Pelosi there. Then there is the issue of the Bidens, James Joe and Hunter, all being guests on the island. Then there is the issue that not only Bill and Hillary Clinton have been there but so had Barak Obama. 

So, unless the Biden DOJ whitewashed the files, there is going to be a lot of explaining by the DNC as to who was on the island, mansion, as well as taking money and "gifts" from Epstein.

[PorkChop96]

Oddly it was confirmed that Schumer, Pelosi, and Warren were on the Island at the same time Epstein was there. Hell, what ever happened to those pictures from the security cameras that showed Pelosi there. Then there is the issue of the Bidens, James Joe and Hunter, all being guests on the island. Then there is the issue that not only Bill and Hillary Clinton have been there but so had Barak Obama. 

So, unless the Biden DOJ whitewashed the files, there is going to be a lot of explaining by the DNC as to who was on the island, mansion, as well as taking money and "gifts" from Epstein.

The Biden DOJ had these files for four years, if anyone believes they did not alter them to make all of their own disappear, you are as ignorant as you are gullible. 

They don't care about the victims, they don't care about bringing all of those on his "list" to justice, they only want one name to be on it and that is their only motive.

They don't care if any of their own go down with the ship, they already know who will and who won't.

They have tried hiding what they know will have the worst optics for them, but let some things lip through the cracks, kind of like the newly released email naming Hakeem Jeffries..........

[quintessentone]

So I guess hes on the list, why else would he vote NO?

 


The only 'no' vote on releasing Epstein files (msn.com)

EDIT: Heres a reddit thread about it, some of the comments are worthwile

The one and only person who voted no on releasing the Epstein files, Clay Higgins. Why? : conspiracy (reddit.com)

This article paints a picture of who this guy is and his MAGA-like biased beliefs.

Epstein files: Who is Clay Higgins, US congressman who voted no on release? | Donald Trump News | Al Jazeera

[putnam6]

So I guess hes on the list, why else would he vote NO?

 


The only 'no' vote on releasing Epstein files (msn.com)

EDIT: Heres a reddit thread about it, some of the comments are worthwile

The one and only person who voted no on releasing the Epstein files, Clay Higgins. Why? : conspiracy (reddit.com)

So glad you posted this... love r/conspirracy, it can be a bit untamed, but it has solid information and analysts. I rarely post, but I read a lot

I agree with most of this post below from your link
 

•12h ago
he didn't claim the files didn't exist, his office was telling the world the files exist months ago, he was claiming it was a hoax by the democrats.
this is within Trump ballpark, he called the covid flu a democrat hoax as well, when it was obviously a real flu.
what he was saying when he said the covid flu was a hoax was that democrats were trying to pin it on him. this is what is happening now as well. and he isn't wrong.
the epstein thing is going to make Trump look bad, but not for the reasons you think.
if there was anything actually damning in them someone would have used them against Trump a long long time ago.
Trump will be pointed at, yes, he will have connections. and he might have connections to Epstein beyond 2008 that he doesn't want people to understand, based on Epstein's current popularity in culture.
but that doesn't mean he has done what people think he has done.
there will be lots of names, but the only one people are looking for is Trump, and he still has a lot of work to do.
Trump specifically understands how an investigation can hobble an administration. he went through it his whole first administration with the Russia crap and then being impeached.
he was trying to kick this can down the road because it's just going to be a bunch of nonsense he has to deal with, and nothing that will actually mean anything.
save this comment and tell me i'm wrong in two years.
i'd love to see it.

[BeTheGoddess]

This article paints a picture of who this guy is and his MAGA-like biased beliefs.

Epstein files: Who is Clay Higgins, US congressman who voted no on release? | Donald Trump News | Al Jazeera

I had no idea who he was until today,, the support of  David  Duke was a pretty big red flag... white flag... confed... yeah

He seems like a guy who will flip on Trump if the need arise.

[quintessentone]

I had no idea who he was until today,, the support of  David  Duke was a pretty big red flag... white flag... confed... yeah

He seems like a guy who will flip on Trump if the need arise.

I think with this guy, he will flip on anyone who doesn't put Israel first.

[midicon]

It may well be that not everyone on that list was involved in the sex thing.

He was powerful in the sense of contacts and finance too.

I watched a video a while back about Eric Weinstein meeting him.

[PorkChop96]

It may well be that not everyone on that list was involved in the sex thing.

He was powerful in the sense of contacts and finance too.

I watched a video a while back about Eric Weinstein meeting him.

Guilty by association is all they care about, not the context/substance of the association, but as long as they can nail someone they deem a threat for anything related to this case they are happy.

[guyfriday]

They have tried hiding what they know will have the worst optics for them, but let some things lip through the cracks, kind of like the newly released email naming Hakeem Jeffries..........

Lets be fair here Jeffries wasn't included in the group of people that had been to the island or mansion. Jeffries was just in the emails due to his begging for money from Epstein after he was released the first time around. 

Not that it's any better, but does make Jeffries look real desperate and sad at the same time.