New video shows officer's perspective in ICE shooting of Renee Good

[SteamyAmerican]

You’d have to ask her…….doh

I think she thought she was being cutesy by taunting the agents, dancing and honking her horn and impeding ice operations, as she was brainwashed and programmed to do by woke activists NGO’s.  They’ll literally say and do anything they’re told because they’re too stupid to think for themselves, as is unfortunately apparent in this thread.

Maybe.

Ill go a bit further and say she was a suicide sleeper cell activated to make sure she was killed near 33rd St.

Discuss.

*wink

[IdeomotorPrisoner]

I’ve said this repeatedly on this thread.   They’re barking up the wrong tree.  Go screech at the last administration for letting 20 million unvetted illegals in and the legislators who passed the immigration laws, NOT ICE, that’s just ignorant low IQ losers screaming vile crap. 

Funny thing, the democrats are on record many times supporting deportation.   Selective outrage and hypocrisy rules the party.

*Does The Drew Barrymore Jillian Voice* 

My IQ is almost 3 thingies long! It looks like two snowmen standing together! 

So... what my low IQ brain thinks you're trying to say is,  "ICE is NEEDED to respond to illegal crime waves or something?" 

California lets everyone in and tries to provide sanctuary.  We should be like Gomorrah by now... right? 

This comment was in response to "California,"  so let's use my state to counter the herd-minded rehetoric your overflowing with. From the local majority opinion... 

We don't need ICE to solve our "Illegal violent crime epidemic" because there ISN'T ONE that exists. 

The covid spike has long smoothed out.  

In 2025:
 

Los Angeles (3.8 million)

Total Homicides: 230 (lowest since 1966)
Rate: 6.05
Violent crime rate: 760/100,000 (0.76%)

* slightly above US large city average of 631. 

 

San Francisco (832,000)

Total Homicides: 28 (lowest since 1954)
Rate: 3.32
Violent crime rate: 467 (0.47%)

 

San Diego (1,395,000)

Total Homicides: 28 (lowest since 1968)
Rate: 2.00
Violent crime rate: 430 (0.43%).

Lowest homicide rate of any city in the US with a top 100 population.

CHALLENGE: Go find me another state with its 3 largest cities (greater than 200,000, Like Ohio, Texas, or Florida) with Violent crime (and especially homicide) rates that rival THESE historic lows...

#3 is actually San Jose, but I didn't want to make it too hard, so i used SF instead. 

If you can do that, you can continue blaming the crime more likely caused by lax gun control and poverty (*hint) on your phantom "destructive illegals."

And you can continue to call us an immigrant ravaged welfare state in need of ICE or guard or ANY TYPE of intervention by this administration... to "reign in our out of control crime." 

That's why they get opposed a lot here.  Only through fantasy and fiction was California's crime and homelessness spike caused by illegal immigration. 

Unless you want to tell me the sensationalized amount he's actually used ICE to deport from my state in 2025 is what allowed us to set historic lows two year running...

If we had 2.6 million illegals in 2024 it means we had 5 million illegals in 2024. 

2024 was historically low. 2025 was historically even lower. 

Basically, what im trying to say is, you name a sanctuary immigrant community, we probably have an enclave for them.  Even have 20,000 Somalis of our own right here in San Diego..

So when you try to substantiate this myth they cause crime, we have our border city with an AMAZINGLY LOW 2.00 homicide rate to say "da fuq you talking about, dude?" 

And though ive added to this like 25 times, i think it needs repeating ad naseum.

You can't even prove this narrative in the state it is supposed to be easiest to prove.

ICE is a caulk to fill imaginary cracks. They have a NOT NEEDED job to do. A Job of propaganda and deceit to terrorize immigrant communities and make a show of it. 

When you have to apprehend people at green card interviews to fill quotas, perhaps it's time to admit you underestimated the number of criminal aliens? Just a little? 

[Good Bacteria]

As far as anyone can tell, it appears that it was a lie that she abused her children. The false claim even stated it was "headline news", when no such news reporting exists. An xAI-led bot, Grok, reviewed the claim. It stated that the allegation against Renee Nicole Good and her partner Rebecca appears false or unsubstantiated. The bot said searches of news reports, public records, and social media showed no arrest or charge. It noted the rumour started from a single X account, and was posted without proof.

To repost what is clearly an unsubstantiated lie, identifies you as either gullible, or a liar.

No-one is making the victim, or her partner, out to be heroes.

She's not a victim. She's was an assailant.
(shrugs)

[Good Bacteria]

None of that matters to this case.

You don’t jump in front of a moving vehicle unless you plan on shooting somebody.  Nor fire an extra 2 shots from the side after you easily get out of the way.

What a rank noxious argument you make, that arresting a helpless girl for obstructing A SICK GOON, should be worth more than her life.

I can't defeat the filter people have that limits discernment and annihilates integrity. (shrugs)

And I'm certainly NOT going to spend 79 pages trying teach grown adults such characteristics.

[SteamyAmerican]

*Does The Drew Barrymore Jillian Voice* 

My IQ is almost 3 thingies long! It looks like two snowmen standing together! 

So... what my low IQ brain thinks you're trying to say is,  "ICE is NEEDED to respond to illegal crime waves or something?" 

California lets everyone in and tries to provide sanctuary.  We should be like Gomorrah by now... right? 

This comment was in response to "California,"  so let's use my state to counter the herd-minded rehetoric your overflowing with. From the local majority opinion... 

We don't need ICE to solve our "Illegal violent crime epidemic" because there ISN'T ONE that exists. 

The covid spike has long smoothed out.  

In 2025:
 
 

 


CHALLENGE: Go find me another state with its 3 largest cities (greater than 200,000, Like Ohio, Texas, or Florida) with Violent crime (and especially homicide) rates that rival THESE historic lows...

#3 is actually San Jose, but I didn't want to make it too hard, so i used SF instead. 

If you can do that, you can continue blaming the crime more likely caused by lax gun control and poverty (*hint) on your phantom "destructive illegals."

And you can continue to call us an immigrant ravaged welfare state in need of ICE or guard or ANY TYPE of intervention by this administration... to "reign in our out of control crime." 

That's why they get opposed a lot here.  Only through fantasy and fiction was California's crime and homelessness spike caused by illegal immigration. 

Unless you want to tell me the sensationalized amount he's actually used ICE to deport from my state in 2025 is what allowed us to set historic lows two year running...

If we had 2.6 million illegals in 2024 it means we had 5 million illegals in 2024. 

2024 was historically low. 2025 was historically even lower. 

Basically, what im trying to say is, you name a sanctuary immigrant community, we probably have an enclave for them.  Even have 20,000 Somalis of our own right here in San Diego..

So when you try to substantiate this myth they cause crime, we have our border city with an AMAZINGLY LOW 2.00 homicide rate to say "da fuq you talking about, dude?" 

It’s like this. The crime was committed by coming here illegally and while it might not rival EU and the UK countries, just because someone isn’t assaulted or murdered doesn’t mean a crime wasn’t committed. And yes people that have hired illegal immigrants should pay the price too.

And before you jump down my throat, hear me out fellow Cali person.

Ahem. It’s a terrible analogy. But it’s the best I’ve come up with for all this.

A town has a beloved building/structure/monument etc. that one night goes up in flames. The town is horrified and saddened by this tragedy. But it is so dear they erect a fence around the burnt piece of history and let it sit to rot. No one does anything nor wants to. And of course there’s no $ to replace it or put something else in its place. Months go by. Years even.

Finally somebody says “F It. Something must be done!” The town holds meeting after meeting. Council members are quoted. Budgets concocted. But all they can come up with is to bulldoze the debris and hope no one else ventures in and hurts themselves or covers it in further graffiti.

People are appalled and the town is verily incensed at the bulldozing.

But. Something had to be done.

something had to be done about the beloved building that was engulfed in fire and incinerated, as that same treasured edifice had now become a public health and safety issue.

You see where I’m going with this? Again it’s a sloppy analogy. But you should see my shirt.

And no. I’m not calling illegal immigrants a hazardous and dangerous public issue. But folks that have had somebody killed or harmed by one might see it that way. Capice?

[IdeomotorPrisoner]

Well, I prefer the spirit of the law. And dont think all cases should be pursued to fill quotas. 

Like a person that came here illegally 15 years ago and that was the only law they ever broke. That has since built a life in OUR community. Made it THEIRS too.  Sure, they might hire others like them at their short-order Mexican food stand, but I dont think it has a negative collateral effect when they're employed. 

I think the letter of the law is being heartless here, and dont give a damn about its appeal to authority and "law enforcement." 

Its always...

"You dont support the enforcement of law"

To which i say. "HELL TO THE F'ING NO." 

Why should I?  

I have avoided quite a few speeding tickets in my life by sobbing on demand and saying, "I didn't need this right now, I'm so sorry... just a terrible day I am having, and now it's that much worse."

The letter of the law says i was pulled over doing 89 in a 70. 

The CHP officers spirit of law lets me go.

But yeah "country of laws."

An infraction  was committed by driving 19 MPH over the posted limit too.  

What about the time I was clocked at 97 and they wrote me up for 84?  Was that enforcement of law? 

It was by San Onofre. Posted 70. Definitely criminal speeding reduced to the minimum citation on the spot. 

Maybe its because I'm white and privileged? Because a vato in a lowrider Impala probably isn't getting a 2 minute talking to like me... Maybe searched?  

Its almost like only white people that dont carry a defacto suspicion get the spirit of the law sometimes.. or at least traditionally.

But then again... Traditionally "illegals" (whose only crime was crossing illegally) didn't get screwed with when they've been here a decade. There was still a some "grandfather clause" ideology.

[chr0naut]

She's not a victim. She's was an assailant.
(shrugs)

If her car struck the officer with force, why did he not drop the phone with which he was filming or the gun in his other hand. Why did he walk away with a normal gait and no sign of injury. Why do none of the videos show the moment when he was struck?

The 2nd and 3rd shots, that killed her, were fired through the open side window of the car when the officer was clearly not in front of the car or in the path of the car.

[SteamyAmerican]

Well, I prefer the spirit of the law. And dont think all cases should be pursued to fill quotas. 

Like a person that came here illegally 15 years ago and that was the only law they ever broke. That has since built a life in OUR community. Made it THEIRS too.  Sure, they might hire others like them at their short-order Mexican food stand, but I dont think it has a negative collateral effect when their employed. 

I think the letter of the law is being heartless here, and dont give a damn about its appeal to authority and "law enforcement." 

Its always...

"You dont support the enforcement of law"

To which i say. "HELL TO THE F'ING NO." 

Why should I?  

I have avoided quite a few speeding tickets in my life by sobbing on demand and saying, "I didn't need this right now, I'm so sorry... just a terrible day I am having, and now it's that much worse."

The letter of the law says i was pulled over doing 89 in a 70. Which might even be criminal speeding. 15+? 

The CHP officers spirit of law lets me go.

But yeah "country of laws."

A crime was committed by driving 19 MPH over the posted limit too.  

Maybe its because I'm white and privileged? Because a vato in a lowrider Impala probably isn't getting a 2 minute talking to like me... Maybe searched?  

Its almost like only white people that dont carry a defacto suspicion get the spirit of the law sometimes.. or at least traditionally.

But then again... Traditionally "illegals" (whose only crime was crossing illegally) didn't get screwed with when they've been here a decade. There was still a some "grandfather clause" ideology.

I don’t disagree with you here.

And yet.

We are either a country of laws or not. Good certainly didn’t get a talking to, and maybe she didn’t deserve it either. While this is the nature of the thread. I won’t comment more than that.

But and also, you know who is most pissed at this whole debacle? Folks that have waited 15 years to get in and naturalized legally only to have this shitshow happen at the same time and throngs of folks with no regard for “the right way” to get along just fine.

Besides. Not only should the people that hire illegal immigrants be held responsible, but we need to find out who all pulled the levers to flood the US and the West with millions of people that may or may not have an interest in assimilating, and certainly tried to game the system whence they were here regardless. Including the takers and facilitators i e Walz etc.

The fact governments have bent over backwards to make their lives easier at the cost of their own citizens is despicable.

Also why not Asia or Africa? Just the West huh? Odd that.

But I digress. I feel for her kin, and Good unfortunately trusted her misplaced self-righteous conviction for a shield that mimics Kirk’s neck-bone.

[IdeomotorPrisoner]

Since this is staying cordial, I will admit that while I vehemently oppose ICE, I wouldn't instigate them with my vehicle or impede their movements with it. I wouldn't think it wise or want to provoke people we sorta are treating like Jane Fonda treated vets. 

Unpopular wars bring out the worst. And I must be the worst, because it would STILL anger me enough to yell at them if they came to my neighborhood to "do their jobs."  

I would still be overridden by my belief, that who they are getting pose no major threat. 

But... Good and her wife put themselves into a position to meet someone really not in the mood for their shit, and I have now seen enough to say his reflex, even if driven by bias, will be deemed justified in any court. 

Beyond reasonable doubt. 

I dont want it to be. But I also wouldn't have confronted them that way.  

However, to not fully back down, i would like to point out  vitriol begets martyrs. And we have an Ashli Babbit of our own now. 

A trollish confrontation-seeking martyr that earned it, whose actions we overlook with bias. Each overlooking all the commands from the trigger-happy federal officers they ignored before getting shot. 

I just dont think our marytr is getting a multimillion dollar settlement for it. 

Theirs will ALWAYS be a martyr and freedom fighter. 
Ours will ALWAYS be a criminal and domestic terrorist. 

And that is more than enough WTF motivation to say "f*ck the mirror. If they refuse to see the reflection, why should I?" 

The god of natural occurrence sure knows how to make a full circle...

[SteamyAmerican]

Since this is staying cordial, I will admit that while I vehemently oppose ICE, I wouldn't instigate them with my vehicle or impede their movements with it. I wouldn't think it wise or want to provoke people we sorta are treating like Jane Fonda treated vets. 

Unpopular wars bring out the worst. And I must be the worst, because it would STILL anger me enough to yell at them if they came to my neighborhood to "do their jobs."  

I would still be overridden by my belief, that who they are getting pose no major threat. 

But... Good and her wife put themselves into a position to meet someone really not in the mood for their shit, and I have now seen enough to say his reflex, even if driven by bias, will be deemed justified in any court. 

Beyond reasonable doubt. 

I dont want it to be. But I also wouldn't have confronted them that way.  

However, to not fully back down, i would like to point out  vitriol begets martyrs. And we have an Ashli Babbit of our own now. 

A trollish confrontation-seeking martyr that earned it, whose actions we overlook with bias. Each overlooking all the commands from the trigger-happy federal officers they ignored before getting shot. 

I just dont think our marytr is getting a multimillion dollar settlement for it. 

Theirs will ALWAYS be a martyr and freedom fighter. 
Ours will ALWAYS be a criminal and domestic terrorist. 

And that is more than enough WTF motivation to say "f*ck the mirror. If they refuse to see the reflection, why should I?" 

The god of natural occurrence sure knows how to make a full circle...

Maybe not.

But the GoFunMe is well over a Mil.