Greer pledges Jan UFO disclosure

[MonkMode]

Burden of proof is on you and your arrogance.

I’m open to whatever is proven to be correct. You arrogantly state you know.

Personally I think it will always be a mix. Mostly misidentification. Some US or foreign craft along with personal aircraft. And possibly something Non-human, but that has never been proven - no matter how arrogantly you proclaim.

I think ARM makes a good point that these “drones” would have been shot down by the U.S. military if they weren’t suspected to be a superior technology.

That they are being down played at least shows that the U.S. military doesn’t want to admit they may not have military supremacy.

Do you think that is a valid point?

[quintessentone]

I think ARM makes a good point that these “drones” would have been shot down by the U.S. military if they weren’t suspected to be a superior technology.

That they are being down played at least shows that the U.S. military doesn’t want to admit they may not have military supremacy.

Do you think that is a valid point?

It may be that we are paying attention to the wrong people who have information to disclose about UAPs that aren't looking to make a fast buck.

These veteran pilots also speak about lack of or poor radar, have a drone discussion, and speak about the strange behaviour of agencies when pilots do report strange craft, like when one pilot asked for the radar reports of the area where UAPs were with him in his air space and the FAA replying to him that they lost those specific radar reports.



Richard Dolan explains delusion of having freedom, elitist control, control of information, etc. in regards to UFO disclosure, or lack thereof.

[Macenroe82]

Video here on Twitter

Greer..

again… this time supposed info from leakers who have "gone to ground" going to be posted on blockchain web site.


sigh.



hope some real evidence… good photos and videos get posted, but I’m not hopeful.

and for the low price of $19.99 you to can be part of disclosure!

In my opinion, anything that creep stamps can’t be trusted and should be avoided when it comes to the UFO topic.
And that’s just my personal opinion.
As we have seen on ATS, everything that he puts out has been shown to be a hoax.
when he first came out, I truly believe he was trying to do good. By lobbying to the government about UFOs and NHI, I think he did some great foundational work.
but then he saw the dollar signs with peoples gullibility and need for there to be more to this world.
it’s a damn shame really.

[MonkMode]

It may be that we are paying attention to the wrong people who have information to disclose about UAPs that aren't looking to make a fast buck.

These veteran pilots also speak about lack of or poor radar, have a drone discussion, and speak about the strange behaviour of agencies when pilots do report strange craft, like when one pilot asked for the radar reports of the area where UAPs were with him in his air space and the FAA replying to him that they lost those specific radar reports.



Richard Dolan explains delusion of having freedom, elitist control, control of information, etc. in regards to UFO disclosure, or lack thereof.

I think there will eventually be a message disclosed, but there is no message from these sightings, which seem to be more like provocations.

My point here, that was first brought up by ARM, is that we all have enough evidence to conclude the “drone incursions” were/are UFOs. There is no response from the U.S. military. If they were really just drones, they would have taken the action to shoot them down.

[quintessentone]

My point here, that was first brought up by ARM, is that we all have enough evidence to conclude the “drone incursions” were/are UFOs. There is no response from the U.S. military. If they were really just drones, they would have taken the action to shoot them down.

Yes, I understood your original point.

If the drones or UFOs are not of any threat to national security, why should they care. Also the masses are pretty much mind controlled to just jump to "it's a hoax" conclusion and make jokes about it on whatever social media platform they are on. The plan is working just fine.

My point was that if we take into consideration the national security failure with the Chinese balloon, meaning no radar at certain elevations, is it farfetched to assume the radar/surveillance tech is just not there?

Are citizens allowed to shoot them down?

Maybe it's time people who really want to investigate should start shooting them down to get a good look.

[MonkMode]

Yes, I understood your original point.

If the drones or UFOs are not of any threat to national security, why should they care. Also the masses are pretty much mind controlled to just jump to "it's a hoax" conclusion and make jokes about it on whatever social media platform they are on. The plan is working just fine.

My point was that if we take into consideration the national security failure with the Chinese balloon, meaning no radar at certain elevations, is it farfetched to assume the radar/surveillance tech is just not there?

Are citizens allowed to shoot them down?

Maybe it's time people who really want to investigate should start shooting them down to get a good look.

Citizens face felonious penalties for shooting at drones.

Certainly there must be more effective ways to hunt UFOs.

[quintessentone]

Citizens face felonious penalties for shooting at drones.

Certainly there must be more effective ways to hunt UFOs.

Or different ways to try to bring them down relatively unscathed for investigation.