Weaponized released video of transmedium UFO

[pianopraze]

Weaponized just released possibly the first civilian video of a transmedium UAP/USO It was a live video and a sailor just showed the video of a transmedium UAP.

Twitter video of ufo going from sky then moving under water
hmm

Watch this video of UFO going from air down under the water then keeps on moving.

[KKLoco]

Very cool! Thanks for posting. So hard to tell the size of it. The men in the video mentioned they thought it was ‘tall’. Then they say ‘way above the water’. But no reference to size. Or distance from them.

So a couple more points after I put it up on the 65” TV and stood two feet way. The men said it was really bright. It certainly cast its light onto the surface of the water. Is there a way to just distance and size by that casting of light? Because if it was far away - it was huge.

On the other hand, it doesn’t seem to be very far away. Or very large for that matter. The video really does climax after it submerges. That’s the best part. Seemed to come up back out of the water a little bit, a few times.

[KKLoco]

Why is there no conversation on this? 

is it because it came from Knapp? Baffling?

[TheGoondockSaint]

It's quite close to them. I would guess 200 yards away?

[KKLoco]

BUMP! Can someone debunk this please?

[Maxmars]

BUMP! Can someone debunk this please?

Just out of curiosity... how would one debunk this?

Other than the fact that 'digital' capture and reproduction of any imagery is suspect from the onset... there's no limit to digital synthesis.
Also, the witnesses may well not be aware of any deception produced at the source.  Thus their reactions could be naturally sincere.

From that cynical perspective, you can debunk nearly anything.

But I suspect you are hoping for 'digital' analysis of the imagery to reveal some flaw in their production, or something like that?

[Encia22]

I think that the problem with analysis of any image or video becomes evermore difficult with material passed on via social media and the internet in general. All SM platforms apply such heavy compression that when we want to drill down to pixel level, all we see is a mess of artefacts. Even static jpeg images degrade in quality with even minor editing and re-saving; by the time we get our mitts on them, there’s nothing of worth left to see. It’s like Chinese whispers, but with digital sources.

Raw video/photographs are what’s needed, but that is hardly ever forthcoming, and even then, modern commercial camcorders/camera phone already apply their own manipulation and now, AI, as Samsung uses, which complicates matters even more.

[KKLoco]

Just out of curiosity... how would one debunk this?

Other than the fact that 'digital' capture and reproduction of any imagery is suspect from the onset... there's no limit to digital synthesis.
Also, the witnesses may well not be aware of any deception produced at the source.  Thus their reactions could be naturally sincere.

From that cynical perspective, you can debunk nearly anything.

But I suspect you are hoping for 'digital' analysis of the imagery to reveal some flaw in their production, or something like that?

Well, good gawd thanks for calling me out, Max. 

Personally, I think this is incredible evidence of USO’s. 

Im just waiting for the experts to prove it BS.

[Maxmars]

Well, good gawd thanks for calling me out, Max. 

Personally, I think this is incredible evidence of USO’s. 

Im just waiting for the experts to prove it BS.

Sorry if I was unintentionally caustic there...

What I mean to say is there's little point in calling for debunking... someone can always conjure up a way.  
There's no end to the cliché "It could have been [insert anything]" argument.  I am stingy with my faith in 'experts.'

[KKLoco]

Sorry if I was unintentionally caustic there...

What I mean to say is there's little point in calling for debunking... someone can always conjure up a way.  
There's no end to the cliché "It could have been [insert anything]" argument.  I am stingy with my faith in 'experts.'

Not at all, Maxy. I was just being playful. And clearly looking for some conversation on the video. I obviously found it compelling. Your beer cheers back is above your reply. I’ve mentioned this glitch many times before. It always places it in the post I’m responding to.