(01-25-2024, 11:45 PM)putnam6 Wrote: 5% It is not ours we suspect its non-human, just not 100% sure. I just cant believe they would be this honest and forthright about it.
Excellent post!
Snipped key point for response.I can't believe they would, either.
You and I and many others know by now that almost everything from any source of media is designed to make a customer out of anyone who will give them a second glance. Sometimes it's not deliberately nefarious per se, only marketing. That doesn't outright imply everything in the media is a flat out lie; only that context manipulation and selective information release is often used to emphasize or manufacture a point--a point which is engineered to maximize audience attention and retention.
Media outlets accumulate large audiences. These media outlets distribute stories derived from information given to them by "someone" who wants them to have it. That "someone" could be a government entity (DOD, foreign government, etc), a large corporation, a wealthy individual, or a number of other sources. These sources only give media outlets information which is intended for public consumption - the "media" simply engineers stories from that information to turn a profit and increase viewership.
This is one reason why "disclosure" in the traditional sense is not worth anticipating at this point. Most sources of information are compromised or sketchy in some way. It's not a good idea to listen at face value.
There are plenty of unconventional aircraft, vehicles, and other examples of rapidly developing technology flying around in the atmosphere and traversing water and land. In the interest of national (and global) security, it would be unwise to disclose information about who knows or understands any given unconventional device, who is manufacturing or operating them, and yes, whether or not any (or how many) of these objects originated on this planet to begin with.
In short, take what you hear with a grain of salt.
