4 hours ago
UPDATE:
This guy claims the artic ufo is copy of his work, or the poster heard the info second or third hand and got some of the details wrong.
that would make this a second whistleblower collaborating the first? Or this guy the original whistleblower/LARPer?
link: Twitter link
quote:
This guy claims the artic ufo is copy of his work, or the poster heard the info second or third hand and got some of the details wrong.
that would make this a second whistleblower collaborating the first? Or this guy the original whistleblower/LARPer?
link: Twitter link
quote:
Quote:Did anyone catach that the 4Chan thread on an Antarctica secret recovery of a being in a pod is almost certainly loosely based on source materials from my research project?
I have put in bold italics my corrective changes. I deleted a couple of words and a full stop from the main paragraph below to restructure the sentences.
"5-Their race saved us hundreds of thousands of years ago, from our creators, who basically engineered us to serve them."
"They came here as "space missionaries." When they arrived, another advanced race was already here. This other race created Homo erectus to serve them and help them take Earth's resources; however, it was a failure. Homo sapiens was created later on when the "space missionaries" arrived, they entered into a war with the other race to save us."
I have talked publicly about the fact our research hints that the remains of an alien mothership may have impacted the ice in Antarctica, potentially allowing for recovery of frozen technologies (smaller craft, escape pods etc). It certainly seems some of our work is borrowed here - unless someone received the same account but parts have been lost through it being a second or third hand account.