Andrew is ordered to appear at Congress to explain his links to paedophile Jeffrey Ep

[Oldcarpy2]

Don't the taxpayers pay the king?
(or is that wrong?)
Then the king turns around and supports Andrew.
So if the taxpayers pay the king and he supports Andrew
then it's the same as the taxpayers supporting Andrew.
If you guys don't give the King a stipend or salary or allowance, then nevermind.  

https://www.google.com/search?q=uk+kings...e&ie=UTF-8

[Vermilion]

Don't the taxpayers pay the king?
(or is that wrong?)
Then the king turns around and supports Andrew.
So if the taxpayers pay the king and he supports Andrew
then it's the same as the taxpayers supporting Andrew.
If you guys don't give the King a stipend or salary or allowance, then nevermind.  

“the Sovereign Grant, which is a taxpayer-funded annual payment for official duties”

“The Sovereign Grant for 2025-26 is set at £132.1 million“

Dang.
I’m in the wrong business.
That’s alot of tax payer money.

This would be $173,502,782.00
Or $475,350.08 per day for 365 days

[FlyersFan]

https://www.google.com/search?q=uk+kings...e&ie=UTF-8

Yikes.  More complicated than I thought.
Can't tell if it's an income from taxpayers
or what.   Whole different system.

[FlyersFan]

“the Sovereign Grant, which is a taxpayer-funded annual payment for official duties”

“The Sovereign Grant for 2025-26 is set at £132.1 million“

Dang.
I’m in the wrong business.
That’s alot of tax payer money.

This would be $173,502,782.00
Or $475,350.08 per day for 365 days

So a 'sovereign grant' is taxpayer money?   So if Charles is supporting Andrew he is doing so with tax payer money ... once removed.   Or did I get that wrong?    Bottom line .... Andrew is living off others, not directly from the taxpayer but it's still taxpayer money sort of ... Charles is just redirecting it to go to pay for Andrew instead of himself ....    wow, complicated.  (at least to me).

[Vermilion]

So a 'sovereign grant' is taxpayer money?   So if Charles is supporting Andrew he is doing so with tax payer money ... once removed.   Or did I get that wrong?    Bottom line .... Andrew is living off others, not directly from the taxpayer but it's still taxpayer money sort of ... Charles is just redirecting it to go to pay for Andrew instead of himself ....    wow, complicated.  (at least to me).

Yes according to his link.
Their king also has more income…

Duchy of Lancaster
This is a private estate of land and property owned by the monarch.
It generates annual profits, which are used by the King for his private expenses.
It is estimated to generate about £20 million in profits per year.
Other income
The King also has personal income from private investments and inherited wealth, which is not publicly disclosed.
The Royal Family also received additional income of £21.5 million in 2024-25 from sources like visitor revenue at Buckingham Palace.
These are private monies not taxpayer monies like the Sovereign Grant is.

[Raptured]

Queue a distraction...

[andy06shake]

It will be Portugal as a "stop over" (yes I know its not on the way but no extradition and Eugenie lives there).

Or is it Spain that is no extradition? meh same shit.

Put it this way, he's going to need to find a rather large rock somewhere to hide under. 

But i think both Spain and Portugal have extradition arrangements with the UK in this day of age.

Same with the USA.

[BeTheGoddess]

Put it this way, he's going to need to find a rather large rock somewhere to hide under. 

But i think both Spain and Portugal have extradition arrangements with the UK in this day of age.

Same with the USA.

Oh great hes coming to Australia. 

Can it be a smaller rock than us?.

Montserrat? No, really, he will need to travel thru Jamacia, they love the RF down Kingston town.

Speaking of Kingston...

[SurferSoul]

Oh look... 

 

Andrew is ordered to appear at Congress to explain his links to paedophile Jeffrey Epstein | Daily Mail Online

If this has traction, there should be more names to come out, we know he is not the only one involved so he should spill the beans on the other creeps.

Exactly! It’s as if Andrew’s public humiliation makes it look like something is being done about any of it. Like only him a Ghislaine were only ones involved. 
What happened to the file on Epstein, what are they trying to cover up and who are they trying to protect?

[andy06shake]

Exactly! It’s as if Andrew’s public humiliation makes it look like something is being done about any of it. Like only him a Ghislaine were only ones involved. 
What happened to the file on Epstein, what are they trying to cover up and who are they trying to protect?

They can kick the can down the road all they wish.

It will still land on Trump's doorstep.

What they are trying to cover up is the same thing they chose to redact, so....