I thought I would share this here because it is strictly a 'computer' thing... particularly, AMD systems.

For many of us, the distinction between them is lost... except now for this reporting.... we'll see what comes of it...

From ArsTechnica: Almost unfixable “Sinkclose” bug affects hundreds of millions of AMD chips


What the article title doesn't say is that the discovery of this "bug" includes that it has existed for many years (it dates back in AMD chip since 2006.)

Also, that once malicious code is deployed via this 'vulnerability' removing it is nearly impossible for a regular use (the ArsTechnica article was subtitled "Worse-case scenario: "You basically have to throw your computer away."... not encouraging at all.
 

After hearing and seeing this blatant excuse of justice by Homeland Security/FBI what are your thoughts ?

Hmm. So this story isn't picked up by the "saintly" USA MSM? Odd isnt it? 

https://www.loudountimes.com/0local-or-n...077be.html

DENY Ignorance. Lets assume that DI is repository for like minded individuals for those who seek the truth.  So lets put your thinking caps on and ask yourself as to why his medical records were released by the Virgina cops? Why as in whats their coin in this game. I hope he owns the town after this one but the cops are covered as the lawsuit money will possibly come from a black budget "kitty"? 

NONE as the cops have NO coin in the game. Thats the above board game. Then we have the otherside. The dark side. See book by Richard Thieme' Mind Games. I own it. I Read it. I get it as I lived through it. 

So to borrow a Q thread from back in the day does the state of Virginia have something in common with either Fort Meade and Langley. Seems to me that based on the release of personal medical records the FEDS are putting the crush on grusch. 

The FEDS typical playbook is as follows:

[1] To entrap. Doesnt work go to step two
[2] To discredit.  Doesnt work go to step three
[3] Suicide 

I am not a fan of Trump but what they did to him and are doing doesnt fit the crime now does it? Yet they let all those other white collar thugs go around and pound law abiding citicizens into the ground. So you want proof just Google it on your own time and deductive reasoning may be required.  

I consider my self an participant expert on FED behavior as I have been through the gauntlet and remain under a permanent gag order by a FED Judge. My partner took his life by shotgun and I know directly why. So how is it that these FEDS just happen to lose evidence all the time? Thats a clue. 

My opinion is based by the book as written by Richard Thieme; "Mind Games" and by reading up to page 50 if you dont get it, we cant help you. 

https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Games-Richar...0938326244

Mind Games, a collection of nineteen stories of brave new worlds and alternate realities Clint Brooks, former Senior Advisor for Homeland Security and Assistant Deputy Director, NSA, says: "Richard Thieme takes us to the edge of cliffs we know are there but rarely visit. He wonderfully weaves life, mystery, and passion through digital and natural worlds with creativity and imagination. Delightful and deeply thought provoking reading." Stories of computer hackers, deception and intelligence, puzzling anomalies, spirituality and mysteries of consciousness, the paranormal, UFOs, alien life forms - in short, everyday life in the 21st century. Play these ""Mind Games" and see why the most common response to Richard Thieme's writing and speaking is: "You made me think."

I do not believe that these hearings are a false flag of fodder to divert attention. They are a slow leak of factual information. I am an UFO experiencer. I want to thank DI for banning another to whom I perceive was a threat to the USA. I dont perceive Grusch as a threat to the USA as I also dont feel that retired FBI Special Agent John Desuza is writing for fame or fortune. He wants the truth out. So look him up and do your dedutive reasoning as can you see any possibly connect to what Desuza is thinking and what Grush has seen? Same with me and I am working with others. 

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm13680478/

Sending my hope and prayers for David Grusch!

Now its 10:10am somewhere in the USA and I havent had a touch of Woo Woo juice! Get it? 

Recently, I was reading about the recent changes to Illinoisian law... the "Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA)".

Evidently, it had apparently been "accidentally" created including "teeth."  And the lobbying army went to work.

Reportedly, "The 2008 law required companies to obtain written consent for the collection or use of biometric data and allowed victims to sue for damages of $1,000 for each negligent violation and $5,000 for each intentional or reckless violation."

But at the time, no one explained that this was a "real thing" and when the metrics came out it became clear that the industry was sucking data so hard they found the potential damages to be "damaging." 

So after a time, this:

From ArsTechnica: Illinois changes biometric privacy law to help corporations avoid big payouts
 

Please post

A short video from history https://www.youtube.com/shorts/440jBM8Bi...ture=share

Why isn't this being talked about as much as it should?
Meteorological agency issues mega-quake advisory as precaution | NHK WORLD-JAPAN News

Quote:Japanese authorities are urging people in a wide section of the country to take precautions against a possible mega-earthquake.
 
They have issued a special advisory for the first time. This comes after a powerful quake rocked Kyushu on Thursday.
 
The advisory is part of a precautionary measure being taken against a possible mega earthquake. The measure is known as the Nankai Trough Earthquake Extra Information protocol.
 
The Japan Meteorological Agency says there is a relatively high possibility that a giant earthquake will strike the area where the Nankai Trough is located. If a large-scale earthquake occurs in the future, strong tremors and large tsunami are expected. While the possibility is now higher than usual, the agency notes this does not mean that something will definitely occur during a certain period of time.
 
A magnitude 7.1 quake struck southwestern Japan early on Thursday, and more tremors hit the area through Friday. Experts note that seismic activity remains high.

Quote: 
Experts believe that the Nankai Trough quake could occur along the plate boundary between Suruga Bay in Shizuoka Prefecture and the Hyuganada Sea off Kyushu. They believe there is a 70 to 80 percent chance that it will strike within the next three decades and have a magnitude in the range of 8 to 9.
 
According to a recent government estimate, in the worst-case scenario, it could claim more than 230,000 lives and destroy about 2 million buildings.

Lots of close range reports involving human related physical UFO effects over the years and John Schuessler has compiled some truly interesting ones in his catalogue below:





• A CATALOG OF UFO-RELATED HUMAN PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS (PDF File)






One of the entries which occurred during the 1964 wave really does sound like a freaky one and involves a UFO setting a boy's hair on fire in broad daylight - the unknown object was also witnessed by his grandmother and the event caused quite a media stir at the time.

Apparently after the incident the boy's nose was not visible, his hair was burnt off and his ears 'were turned inside out resembling ground beef' - his mother also described him as looking like a 'monster' and refused to give him a mirror.

Also found it interesting that the boy suffered temporary blindness (as other UFO witnesses do) and, although the grandmother stated the flames covered the child's entire body, he was only affected from the neck up.

Quote:1964/06/02 NEW MEXICO, HOBBS

1600 Source: FATE, Oct. 1968
National Enquirer, Oct. 28, 1970

Charles Davis was burned by a blackish ball of fire from a strange object overhead. His hair was singed, and a sooty deposit was left embedded in the skin of his face and on his ears, neck, and shirt. His face became so swollen that his nose wasn’t discernable. He had no pain but was afraid he was going to die. The event was witnessed by his grandmother, Mrs. Frank Smith.



EFFECTS:


• Burned hair

• Swollen skin

• Ears that looked like raw meat

• Sooty deposits

• No pain

Quote:Guest David Marler with a premier discussion of his most recent research of a UFO Burn Victim Case - New Mexico 1964. There are early audio excerpts of an original witness and a bonus clip at the end of the show of an on camera interview with victim, Charles Davis after he has tracked down 56 years after the incident.

Just saw this interesting video on the Great Pyramids.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EaDQuubW-Wk

Even though they claim they 'never forced anyone to do anything' lol.

How do people who 'trust' the people running the government logically internalise these two statements?





• Lockdown - it's so important that everyone stays in their homes and has no contact with anyone due to viral contagion - it's so serious we are shutting down the global economy.





• Immigration - yes we are freely allowing literally millions of unchecked, unknown people across our borders and actually paying them upon arrival.






Can anybody help me with this apparent cognitive dissonance?

Hope folks can imagine the ramifications of these two seemingly opposing ideologies (even though they are coming from the same place).

Is conformity being mistaken for intelligence now?

I thought this interesting enough to share...

It's about some common notions that aren't true... and I, at least at one point or other, thought most of them were...

Ultimately, this is about censorship.  

I consider censorship to be one of the "apex" class of conspiracies. 

Regardless of the reasoning or cause, people must conspire to effect censorship. 

It's one of those things I might callout when people tell me that most conspiracy theory is paranoid nonsense... I would ask... "How about censorship? That's always a conspiracy..." and it would lead down the eventual acceptance that "Conspiracy Theory is a real thing." 

In this case it comes illuminated in the video I have attached below.  While not well-versed in classical art, I found it mostly interesting (except the embedded commercial.)

I hope others see this an an interesting example censorship often overlooked ... and what the impact was.

The new Veep for Kamala. I don’t know anything about him other than he was Governor of Minnesota. What should we know about this guy?

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/poli...512447007/

I am learning about the U.S. Department of Justice's case against TikTok... where there press releases allege a "massive-scale invasion of children's privacy."

This of course, is all something that had been 'not explicitly regulated' until 1998 when the legislature finally made a call and passed the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 (COPPA)... From that point forward, any website operation online was lawfully required to conduct their data collection within specific parameters...

Briefly, COPPA created an obligation necessary to operate within our region... and apparently TikTok, by virtue of the primacy of it's corporate existence, resisted fulfilling that obligation (ostensibly until now.)  Billions have been poured into lobbying against this obligation, not just by TikTok, but by others as well.

From ArsTechnica: DOJ sues TikTok, alleging “massive-scale invasions of children’s privacy”
 

Consciousness is really quite simple. The reason so many people grapple with it is because they cannot get rid of the materialist paradigm. The basic idea is the assumption that consciousness emerges from the physical, from the brain, and is the result of firing synapses and chemicals creating an environment where consciousness can thrive. he idea is that consciousness is an emergent property from the physical. The amount of time and effort spent on attempting to explain consciousness in terms of the physical is prodigious, and completely wrong.

Consciousness does not come from the physical. It utilizes (and requires) the physical to manifest. You can still say that consciousness emerges from the physical, but it may be more correct to say it emerges out of the physical in the same way a television program emerges out of the television set. The physical TV has all the circuits and parts necessary to pick up a signal and play it through the TV set. No one would ever claim that the TV program came out of or was created by the TV set itself. The program was created elsewhere and packaged in such a way that it could manifest through the TV set to be seen by the viewer.

When I was a child growing up in the fifties there were quite a few westerns on the three TV channels that were available. I imagined that all the dead cowboys and Indians had to be lying dead in the back of the television set and that if I could get the back of the TV off, that's where I would find them. My father disabused me of this notion when he did that very thing and took the many tubes to the grocery store to a testing machine so he could find the broken ones. There was a lot of dust and cobwebs in back of the TV, but no dead cowboys. Of course I also was afraid to sit in front of the TV in my pajamas because I feared the host of "I Search for Adventure," Jack Douglas, could see I wasn't properly dressed.

You are not going to get anywhere useful in explaining consciousness until you accept the fact that there is more to reality than just the physical. Yes, that's anathema to "science," but you still need to change your ideas of what constitutes reality. Consciousness does not inherently reside "here." Of course, if you call consciousness the "soul" you get into even more trouble with the enlightened people of science, but let's just try it as a mental exercise. For consciousness to manifest in the physical realm it requires a physical brain with all those synapses and chemicals. Once that connection is made you can do what you need to do here. If you need or want to do advanced physics, you need a brain capable of it. That's why apes can't do it. Their brains are not sufficiently developed to allow them to manage those types of thoughts. They still have consciousness, just as all animals do, but their brains are like black and white TV sets without the capacity to show advanced color. Their brains limit their abilities. The growth in the ability of consciousness to express itself requires advanced evolution in brains.

Of course there is a massive feedback loop going on vis-s-vis evolution. You need opposable thumbs and a sufficiently long lifetime to allow for education before you can embark on civilization. So it's complex, to be sure. But NONE of this implies God or Jesus or any of the religious mumbo jumbo that has retarded us as a species. That is what scares materialists the most, the idea that if they accept the duality of consciousness then they must accept dealing with the religious crazies. Don't worry; they're still crazy, but my guess is that the more thoughtful theologians know this very well. As one scientist put it years ago: As you travel up the mountain of understanding searching for the truth, you may very well find the theologians at the top waiting for you.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Book of the Damned was the first published nonfiction work by American author Charles Fort (first edition 1919). Concerning various types of anomalous phenomena including UFOs, strange falls of both organic and inorganic materials from the sky, odd weather patterns, the possible existence of creatures generally believed to be mythological, disappearances of people, and many other phenomena, the book is considered to be the first of the specific topic of anomalistics.

Reference: The Book of the Damned; Chapter 20, Triangular by Charles Fort

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/22472/22...2472-h.htm

I thought I would toss this out here as to provide reference materials that run opposite to the 2024 narrative what is pushed by the United States, UFO "experts" , NASA  and to the millions of arm chair UFO quarterbacks whom just either don’t get it or have little to offer towards the progression of mankind. Either that or they are on the disinformation payroll or the list for disappearance. I also get that many of you will never believe that ET exists until they land in front of your house and have their way with your wife or children. What’s that saying from Kansas? Anyway I am no billionaire but Robert Bigelow gets it and so do I as to the existence of UFO's and ET or AI or whatever runs these crafts. I am an experiencer and witness. So do yourself a favor and do some due diligence of your own. I attached a link so you can fact mine if you wish. This book is basically a listing of events that were documented in the media of the day in the 1700's and 1800's and it covers a lot of unexplained happenings. As it written back in 1919 before the CIA was in existence along with Men In Black it can be construed as original as not corrupted. The author throws much shade on those experts and their explanations and that’s back in 1919. Say what? 

BACKGROUND:

My first sighting of a Black Triangle was during December 2018. I have a video of it along with a still camera picture as it was crossing in front of the moon. I was a member in good standing of ATS back then and I posted the pictute which was subsequently posted by ATS on Goggle Images relating to Silent Black Triangles. I am currenly shadow banned. I aslo cant communicate with the other ATS witnesses of the Triangle. Men in Black do work in mysterious ways dont they. 

What I saw was huge and on its belly were 100's of geometric projections like a printed circuit board. It was black with one light in the center and it was larger that a football field and made NO noise. My other ATS contact also saw it on other days and have videos and pictures. One member says it lands in the ocean. Cirquids? Another member says it is based somewhere in thw mountains where Georgia, South Carolina and Tenessee border one another. 

What I am writing here is that I am witness to one, and that going back to the 1800's there are numerous reports on a global basis of triangles being seen in the sky. 

So how about taking a chance on the existance of God? Say a prayer for yourself.

https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...ca15eb.jpg

https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...1a76ff.jpg

So, the wife and I gave up cable a couple years ago, but periodically we will stream something fun from the interwebz. Recently, we've been playing along with the gameshow, "The 1% Club". For those unfamiliar, it's a Q&A game show which starts out with 100 contestants and everyone is asked a question. People who get it wrong are eliminated. The questions get progressively more difficult as the game goes on. They phrase each successive question by saying what percent of 100 will get the question correct. Some questions are easy, and some are very difficult. All of the questions involve using your head in a common sense way, not just in a smart way. In other words, by about 50% most of the questions are trick questions. The top prize is $100k, split evenly between all contestants who make it to the final round and answer the final question correctly.

My wife and I are pretty good at the game, and can usually get into the 10% bracket without any trouble (i.e. only 10 out of 100 will get it right). Oddly, some of the questions in the middle 45-50% are the hardest and weed out the most players (often 10-15 per question). By the 10% question there are usually only about 4-5 players left (out of 100).

Tonight we were watching, and were on a roll, batting 1000 on the questions all the way through. It came down to the final question, and there were (2) contestants left ($50k each if they got it right). They asked question which was totally wrong, and nobody won. We got the answer correct (but weren't contestants just viewers). Because we streamed and saved the game, we went back and reviewed the question. Sure enough, the question they asked, was NOT the answer they gave.

They showed (5) longer words and the question was to form "common words" from each of the (5) complex words. I managed to form (5) common words. The two contestants completely locked up. One of them got two words. The host remarked they missed it by only (1) word, that they needed to form THREE common words out of the (5) words. This was NOT what the question asked; it said nothing about forming (3) words, only that you needed to form a common word from ALL (5) words. There was absolutely no question about what the question asked, and no question about how wrong the host and the show was about the answer given. The (2) contestants lost fair and square, so no argument there, BUT...if we had been there and answered all (5) words, I believe we would have been disqualified also. Blatant error on the show.

So, tonight I decided to go out and look on the web about this. I discovered two things. First, I guess the show also has a UK counterpart (like 'Got Talent' and a few others). Second, I discovered our observation was not unique; the show has gotten the top question wrong on numerous occasions. In some of the cases the contestants answered correctly only to be told they were wrong and sent home empty handed.

It's been a long time since we watched a show which was fun and challenging. I was pretty disappointed to see they give out a wrong answer, just blatantly wrong, for the finale'.

Back to reading books again I guess. Bummer. (I was even contemplating sending in an application to see if I could get on the show too! Probably never happen, but it's about the first time I ever thought that. I can generally rule on Jeopardy on most subjects, but sometimes they get into some pretty obscure stuff which loses me. But not this 1% Club; if I can make it past question #5, I can usually go all the way). Question #5 and #6 are generally the hardest questions (and even though they say these are 50% questions, they usually take out about 75% of the remaining contestants).

Anyway...bummer!
.
.
.
.
=========================================================

Because we stream the show, it's not live, but we don't cheat. So, we have no knowledge of the questions or answers before we watch the program. What's nice is we can skip through all the idle chatter and BS, and cut right to the questions. About 60% of the questions are multiple choice, and about 40% require an original answer. Most of the questions are very similar to IQ test type questions (i.e. shapes, geometry, words, play on words, math, word problems, etc.).

It's really a fun show, and I'm sure we'll keep watching, but my hopes of going on the show have been seriously dashed now that I've seen they make some (serious) mistakes. (Not that I seriously ever thought I'd get picked though.)

I return with a grave and urgent warning that demands your attention. The decisions made in the coming months, particularly surrounding the November US presidential election, will set into motion events that could lead to a catastrophic nuclear conflict by the year 2026. The shadows of this future are becoming clearer, and it is imperative that you heed this warning.

The path to this dire outcome is fraught with escalating tensions and pivotal moments. My observations:

November 2024: The presidential election is marred by controversy and widespread unrest. The outcome, regardless of the winning candidate, leaves the nation deeply divided and on edge. Protests and clashes become a daily occurrence, further polarizing the populace.

Spring 2025: The new administration adopts a hardline stance on international relations, particularly with rival superpowers. Diplomatic efforts are replaced with shows of military strength, and several critical alliances begin to fracture. Key treaties that once ensured a fragile peace are abandoned, heightening global instability.

Fall 2025: A series of aggressive maneuvers and provocations in contested regions, such as Eastern Europe and the South China Sea, bring the world to the brink of war. Misinformation and cyber warfare play significant roles in escalating these conflicts, making diplomacy nearly impossible.

Early 2026: A major incident, perhaps an accidental missile launch or a significant terrorist attack attributed to a state actor, ignites the spark that leads to all-out war. The retaliation is swift and devastating, with nuclear-armed nations unleashing their arsenals in a bid to assert dominance or ensure survival.

Mid-2026: The nuclear exchanges devastate major cities and infrastructure globally. The aftermath is a world plunged into chaos, with millions of lives lost and countless others suffering from the effects of radiation and the collapse of social order. The geopolitical landscape is irreparably altered, and the survivors are left to navigate a new, harsher reality.

This is not a prophecy set in stone, but a warning of what could be if current trajectories are not altered. The potential for nuclear conflict is real and terrifying. However, there is still time to change course.

The future is shaped by the actions we take today. The warning is clear: we stand on the precipice of potential devastation, but together, we have the power to steer away from the abyss.

-John

I tried this once before on ATS to no avail, so I thought I'd try again here. I’d like to sign up for the New World Order in the Black Ops UFO division, which is why I posted here instead of the NWO site specifically. I’d rather not do the neo-fascist thing, but Capitalist Masonic Pig Dog would be fine with me. My grandfather was a Mason, and I know he would have encouraged me to join had he not died before I was born. I’m cool with it. I’ve heard so many good things about the NWO that I think it’s time for me to make my contribution to the greater good. Does anyone know how to submit an application? I mean, do the Men in Black monitor this board looking for recruits, or maybe the top secret black ops guys? I don’t know, of course, but I’m assuming they must, so I thought I’d just ask them right here since their phone number is, like, unlisted.

Look, I’m well qualified. I have a lifetime of experience in both conspiracies, UFOs, and bureaucracies. I’m computer literate and height/weight proportionate. I don’t smoke. I lean conservative and I’m a loyal American. I feel my education (B.A. and a Master's), experience, and loyalty qualify me as a commissioned officer. Considering that time is of the essence here (I’m no spring chicken), I suggest you start me off as, say, a Lieutenant Colonel. I’m not asking to set policy or anything, but I’d like to contribute at a meaningful level and I simply do not have the time to work up through the ranks. I’m a pretty good mission specialist. Just give me direction and I’ll get the job done whatever it is. Once you see my resume you’ll understand what I’m talking about. Eventually I’d like to join the General Staff. I know I have to prove myself first, but I wanted you to know I have goals. Oh, also! I’ve had a Secret Clearance before, so we don’t have to start from scratch.

So if you would just contact me offline, which should be easy enough for folks like you. I’m not really hiding, but I don’t want to deal with the cranks. I mean, I’ve got Caller ID on purpose. Other than that I’m easy to find. Contact me and I’ll point you to my online resume (if you haven’t found it already) and we can go from there. There’s a big open field directly in front of my house (see Google Earth to verify), so if you are restricted to, shall we say, more exotic means of travel, it should be no problem. You could always just drive up in a black sedan and knock on the door. That would be okay, too. Don’t worry about the dog. He has a big bark, but he’s really harmless. If he knows who you are he’ll hide under the bed anyway. That’s what he did last time the cops showed up. (It was no big deal. I’ll tell you all about it.)

Oh, by the way, I don’t require payment except for expenses incurred. I’ll volunteer. I wanted you to know how serious I am about this. And I’m a pretty good shot.

Thanks. Looking forward to hearing from you soon.

P.S. I'm not kidding.

I'll start off by admitting that we should be concerned about the climate.  Just as we should be concerned about any global dynamics that affect our lives and the lives of our future generations.

But the angry, alarmist-activists who's purpose is to garner attention, should be exposed to reality... namely that "We don't know everything, and what we do know is both incomplete, and only partially understood."

From PhysOrg: Not the day after tomorrow: Why we can't predict the timing of climate tipping points

First some housekeeping stuff you can skip, if you are so inclined...

• The article appears under what PhysOrg labels as "Editor's Notes" - Whether or not this is a left-handed way to disguise an "opinion" article, is unclear to me.  But it is important to recognize that it is not being "published" as climatology cannon, meaning the author still maintains a firm "greenhouse gas" orientation.
  
• The source material for this article is a scientific journal publication from "Technical University Munich."
  
• The source paper: Uncertainties too large to predict tipping times of major Earth system components from historical data
  

I found this incredible article while looking around the web for a 'update' of my favorite book. I wanted to share this interview.
 

Quote:When it came out in 1988, Noam Chomsky and Edward Herman’s Manufacturing Consent rattled the accepted view in post-Vietnam, post-Watergate America that journalists’ relationship to power was essentially adversarial. Instead, they argued, the institutional structure of American media — its dependence on corporate advertising and sources in the upper ranks of government and business — created a role for the press as creators of propaganda. Without any direct press censorship, with full freedom of speech, the media narrowed the political debate to exclude anything that offended the interests of the market or the state.
 
Thirty years after the publication of Manufacturing Consent, the journalist Matt Taibbi has made it his mission to provide an update of Chomsky and Herman’s critique for the twenty-first century. A columnist for Rolling Stone who has written at length about the 2008 financial crisis and Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, Taibbi’s new book, The Fairway, is appearing in serial form on the newsletter site Substack.

I ran across a headline to an article which I could not read...
But the particulars don't really speak to this thread anyway...

A short while ago, we receive word that the person they are calling the "9/11 mastermind" has reached a plea agreement with the US government to avoid the death sentence.

It was understandably politicized, of course.  But I found myself wondering about the timing...  wondering if the 'deal' wasn't meant to provide an "appearance" for some end unrelated to criminal justice.  I hesitated to comment on the subject until now because....

Biden-Harris administration backtracks, revokes plea deal for 9/11 terrorists

As this is a FoxNews story, I expected it to be brimming with personal criticisms, conservative pandering, and other such 'political' garbage.  But I couldn't read it, as it was one of those many articles that Big Media places behind a "give us your identity, and we'll let you read it" ploys.

But I noticed a few things...

Suddenly it is the "Biden-Harris" administration... not the Biden administration...
The benign term "backtrack" makes it seem the previously accepted plea deal was nothing more serious than a pinky-swear...
And the association of the "mastermind" is being offered to terrorists, not just him.

I don't profess to being a law professional... so I may be wrong... but most frequently, it is the defendant who rescinds the plea deal*...  after all, an 'accepted' plea deal was already "accepted" by the Judge... it was an agreement of the legal variety.  For the sate to rescind an already accepted deal, I would have assumed a legal "justification" is in order for the judge to refuse or acquiesce to.

I think the embarrassment of the deal, and the emotional fallout that might befall voters was too costly to the political game. Maybe I'm wrong, but whatever reason the government moved to accept the deal in the first place was not exactly kosher....  but... once again... maybe I'm wrong... what do you think?

(* pleas usually get rescinded after "new" facts about the prosecution's case come to light.  It's up to the judge.   PS - I'm not a lawyer.)

Love this group and all their content is always original and thought provoking.




Absolute tunes lol.


























Viewer discretion