Trump says he bombed Iran

[Orby]

87-95% Of UK Grooming Gang Rapists Are Pakistani Muslims, 250,000 Victims As Young As 4 Yrs Old: Rape Gang Inquiry Report Reveals - The Commune
The article is built around a real, newly-published (June 2026) *private, non-statutory* “Rape Gang Inquiry Report” chaired by Rupert Lowe MP, and it correctly repeats several elements that are attributable to that document (e.g., that it is ~219 pages and makes a “250,000+ victims” claim). However, many of the article’s most consequential assertions (e.g., precise victim totals, nationwide coverage claims, and strong causal claims about “rape jihad” driven by Islamic theology) are not corroborated by authoritative, independent, up-to-date public evidence. Where the UK Government’s own Casey audit (June 2025; updated January 2026) speaks directly to scale, it explicitly says the scale of *group-based* CSE cannot currently be assessed from official data and warns of inconsistent definitions and poor datasets. Overall, the piece mixes some verifiable references (existence of reports, broad institutional-failure framing, and certain headline statistics from Casey) with extensive, inflammatory interpretation and quantitative extrapolation that remains unverified. 87-95% Of UK Grooming Gang Rapists Are Pakistani Muslims, 250,000 Victims As Young As 4 Yrs Old: Rape Gang Inquiry Report Reveals - The Commune – Fact Check – UK Fact Check Politics

[andy06shake]

I hear that figure all the time. I'll try find it sure. 

Secondly yes a beast is a beast. I'm just pointing to the reality that we as a country are edging towards a civil war. I'm not anti Islam, the peopleare part of the Abrahamic world, what I'm anti is civil war. You can't mix Christian and Muslim without trouble occuring. It's just a fact! Be it Lebanon, Kosovo, Bosnia , Sudan, etc etc etc it really is not a good idea. Sorry if you can't see this. To me it's just a historical fact.

Then it must be true if you heard it. 

Who would you fight first, Orby?

As to your "you can't mix Christian and Muslim without trouble occuring" nonsense.

You get that Islam is an Abrahamic religion?  

The same could be said about Catholic and Protestants, and yet we get along just fine for the most part.

Go figure.

Religious diversity does not automatically cause conflict.

Civil wars usually come from politics, power struggles, economics, and foreign interference.

Seldom is religion in this day and age a primary cause for civil war.

[andy06shake]

87-95% Of UK Grooming Gang Rapists Are Pakistani Muslims, 250,000 Victims As Young As 4 Yrs Old: Rape Gang Inquiry Report Reveals - The Commune
The article is built around a real, newly-published (June 2026) *private, non-statutory* “Rape Gang Inquiry Report” chaired by Rupert Lowe MP, and it correctly repeats several elements that are attributable to that document (e.g., that it is ~219 pages and makes a “250,000+ victims” claim). However, many of the article’s most consequential assertions (e.g., precise victim totals, nationwide coverage claims, and strong causal claims about “rape jihad” driven by Islamic theology) are not corroborated by authoritative, independent, up-to-date public evidence. Where the UK Government’s own Casey audit (June 2025; updated January 2026) speaks directly to scale, it explicitly says the scale of *group-based* CSE cannot currently be assessed from official data and warns of inconsistent definitions and poor datasets. Overall, the piece mixes some verifiable references (existence of reports, broad institutional-failure framing, and certain headline statistics from Casey) with extensive, inflammatory interpretation and quantitative extrapolation that remains unverified. 87-95% Of UK Grooming Gang Rapists Are Pakistani Muslims, 250,000 Victims As Young As 4 Yrs Old: Rape Gang Inquiry Report Reveals - The Commune – Fact Check – UK Fact Check Politics

Yeah, look at the trust score, Orby.

28/100. 

Unverified Claims

• “At least 250,000 young White British girls” have been subjected to systematic rape/trafficking/torture/forced conversion by “predominantly Pakistani Muslim grooming gangs” across the UK for “more than four decades” (as an independently corroborated estimate, rather than an internal claim of the Lowe report).
  
• The report’s characterisation of the abuse as “rape jihad” driven by Islamic theological motivations, and the claim that “eight theological and legal aspects of Islam” systematically motivated perpetrators (as a demonstrated causal explanation across cases, rather than an interpretive argument).
  
• The claim that coordinated operations spanned “approximately 149 local authority districts” covering “50 percent of UK areas” (as a validated nationwide mapping beyond the Lowe report’s own compilation).
  
• The claim that abuse “began as early as the 1950s” and “intensified dramatically after 1977” and the article’s immigration/political-causation framing (including the reference to Tony Blair ‘victory … in 1977’).
  
• The quantitative claim that “87 percent of those convicted in group-based child sexual exploitation cases bore distinctively Muslim names” (no independent statistical source was located in the research window; the only clear anchoring found was inside the Lowe report/PDF reproductions).
  
• Attribution/accuracy of specific alleged quotations and extreme testimony details in the article (e.g., A&E discharge ‘without questions’, call-handler statements about ‘different culture’, branding, ‘red rooms’, forced witnessing of murder, bestiality) — not independently verified here and may require case-by-case corroboration from court records, safeguarding reviews, or statutory inquiry transcripts.
  
• The claim that London Mayor Sadiq Khan ‘consistently claimed no grooming gangs operated in the city’ (public reporting indicates contested/ambiguous phrasing and definitional disputes rather than a clearly verified blanket denial in all forms).
  
• The statement that ‘In October 2025, the Metropolitan Police announced a review of 9,000 child sexual exploitation cases’ (the existence of a ~9,000-case review is supported, but the article’s precise timing and framing as an ‘announcement’ by the Met requires additional primary corroboration beyond the sources opened here).
  
• Claims about CPS conduct under ‘Starmer-era’ (e.g., ‘letting thousands off with mere warnings’, suppressing religion/ethnicity data as a policy, ‘no deportations’) — not confirmed with primary documentation in the research window.
  

 

Bias & PresentationDetected Biases:

• Religious/ethnic generalisation: repeated linkage of ‘Pakistani Muslim’ identity to criminality, and claims of religiously driven ‘rape jihad’ presented as settled.
  
• Inflammatory framing: use of ‘bombshell’, ‘industrial scale’, ‘rape jihadis’, ‘sacrificed’, and absolutist language (‘without doubt’, ‘undeniable link’) elevates certainty beyond what official datasets support.
  
• Category inflation risk: mixing population-wide child sexual abuse prevalence statistics with claims about *group-based* ‘grooming gangs’ can mislead readers about what each figure actually measures.
  
• Political scapegoating: broad claims about Labour/Conservative governments and specific figures (e.g., Sadiq Khan, ‘Starmer-era CPS’) stated in a prosecutorial tone without document-level proof in the text.
  

Again, the claim is nothing more than race bait hate filled bollocks.

The kind of figures Gammon clowns punt from soapboxes to their illiterate audience whilst sh@gging a flag for good measure. 

[Orby]

Yeah, look at the trust score, Orby.

Again, the claim is nothing more than race bait hate filled bollocks.

The kind of figures Gammon clowns punt from soapboxes to their illiterate audience whilst sh@gging a flag for good measure. 

Ok let's forget about it, the gang rape of our girls by largely Kashmiri gangs didn't happen. We don't want to create a civil war so let's sweep it under the carpet (like the authorities did over here) and forget about it! 

Back to Iran 

[andy06shake]

Ok let's forget about it, the gang rape of our girls by largely Kashmiri gangs didn't happen. We don't want to create a civil war so let's sweep it under the carpet (like the authorities did over here) and forget about it! 

Back to Iran 

Are you sure, because you sound like you do indeed wish to see a civil war take place here in the UK.  

And yet can't present a shred of tangible evidence to start one.

If you could simply suggest who you wish to fight first, that might be nice?

What we want, Orby, is peace, prosperity, and a decent quality of life for this generation and the next.

For all people, no matter their colour, creed, or the religion that they happen to follow or were born into. 

War in Iran certainly won't help bring that about either, so...

[Orby]

Are you sure, because you sound like you do indeed wish to see a civil war take place here in the UK.  

And yet can't present a shred of tangible evidence to start one.

If you could simply suggest who you wish to fight first, that might be nice?

What we want, Orby, is peace, prosperity, and a decent quality of life for this generation and the next.

For all people, no matter their colour, creed, or the religion that they happen to follow or were born into. 

War in Iran certainly won't help bring that about either, so...

I haven't got the time yet I'd love to post all the far right stuff going on too. 

As far as I'm concerned we are heading towards a low level civil war. Nope don't want a civil war hence posting what I post, as in my eyes, most can't see it. Yet they haven't got the background knowledge. So fair doos. I certainly do not want civil war. 

On who we fight for? Lol, neither 'side.' I can't bear Islamic fanatics while at the same time I can't bear flag waving, beer swilling, shaven headed, Home Bargains dressing gown loving, benefits scrounging, good for nothing, lazy bone idle idiots who support the far right. When it kicks off, I'll be out of here. Couldn't give a monkeys. that will be the reality at that time. With the knowledge I have now I wouldn't have fought in the Great War either. WW2 yes I would as that was a real threat to our way of life. 

Love, Andy, is always the answer x

[andy06shake]

I haven't got the time yet I'd love to post all the far right stuff going on too. 

As far as I'm concerned we are heading towards a low level civil war. Nope don't want a civil war hence posting what I post, as in my eyes, most can't see it. Yet they haven't got the background knowledge. So fair doos. I certainly do not want civil war. 

On who we fight for? Lol, neither 'side.' I can't bear islamic fanatics while at the same time I can't bear flag waving, beer swilling, shaven headed, Homme Bargains dressing gown loving, benefits scrounging, good for nothing, lazy bone idle idiots who support the far right. When it kicks off, I'll be out of here. Couldn't give a monkeys. that will be the reality at that time. With the knowledge I have now I wouldn't have fought in the Great War either. WW2 yes I would as that was a real threat to our way of life. 

Love, Andy, is always the answer x

You're missing the point, Orby. 

Political tension and extremism exist here.

But most people are not seeking violence.

They share more common ground than they do differences.

And comparing modern disagreements to historical wars ignores some rather major differences.

Civil war in this nation would amount to groups of vigilante Gammon scum chapping on people's doors.

And on the spot, judging whether or not the people behind them are ""British"" enouth to remain or exist. 

You know it, i know it, and so do the racists...

At which point, they may as well wear brown shirts and SS uniforms.

You can't love people like that or defeat them with kindness...

Keeping in mind "benefits scrounging, good for nothing, lazy bone, idle idiots who support the far right" would be the ""front line troops.""

What would you do when they chapped your door?

Invite them in for a cup of tea, and hope they like the look of you and yours.

It's not a gamble i would be willing to make, put it that way...

[Orby]

You're missing the point, Orby. 

Political tension and extremism exist here.

But most people are not seeking violence.

They share more common ground than they do differences.

And comparing modern disagreements to historical wars ignores some rather major differences.

Civil war in this nation would amount to groups of vigilante Gammon scum chapping on people's doors.

And on the spot, judging whether or not the people behind them are ""British"" enouth to remain or exist. 

You know it, i know it, and so do the racists...

At which point, they may as well wear brown shirts and SS uniforms.

You can't love people like that or defeat them with kindness...

I just see things in the long term Andy. You are assessing things from the viewpoint of right now. We will see how things develop, we don't know right now whether a civil war will break out or not. We just don't know. All I am saying is that the ingredients for a civil conflict are there. Let's see where we get to in a decade or two, after a few economic collapses 2008 style and worse, when mass immigration has brought millions more Muslims to our islands, when more industry has gone abroad and the industrial cities turn into economic wastelands, when a few more Bataclan, 7/10, 7/7, 9/11, have happened, when too many people (of all backgrounds) have had their reason for being taken over by AI and sit on their computers all day and have nothing else to do but get brainwashed by either potential side. We must wait and see what happens Andy. Nobody can see into the future. Only the progression.

[andy06shake]

I just see things in the long term Andy. You are assessing things from the viewpoint of right now. We will see how things develop, we don't know right now whether a civil war will break out or not. We just don't know. All I am saying is that the ingredients for a civil conflict are there. Let's see where we get to in a decade or two, after a few economic collapses 2008 style and worse, when mass immigration has brought millions more Muslims to our islands, when more industry has gone abroad and the industrial cities turn into economic wastelands, when a few more Bataclan, 7/10, 7/7, 9/11, have happened, when too many people (of all backgrounds) have had their reason for being taken over by AI and sit on their computers all day and have nothing else to do but get brainwashed by either potential side. We must wait and see what happens Andy. Nobody can see into the future. Only the progression.

A lot of people work from behind their PC in this day of age, Orby, thats just the way the world spun.

But civil wars require organised armed factions and state breakdown, not just social tensions.

I think history shows us that diverse societies can coexist, if in doubt, see Ancient Rome, The Ottoman Empire, and/or The United States or UK...

We shape our future Orby, we make it happen, as much as we sit and watch it take place.

And im afraid on that note, i need to go make some things happen in the real world...

[SomeStupidName]

I just see things in the long term Andy. You are assessing things from the viewpoint of right now. We will see how things develop, we don't know right now whether a civil war will break out or not. We just don't know. All I am saying is that the ingredients for a civil conflict are there. Let's see where we get to in a decade or two, after a few economic collapses 2008 style and worse, when mass immigration has brought millions more Muslims to our islands, when more industry has gone abroad and the industrial cities turn into economic wastelands, when a few more Bataclan, 7/10, 7/7, 9/11, have happened, when too many people (of all backgrounds) have had their reason for being taken over by AI and sit on their computers all day and have nothing else to do but get brainwashed by either potential side. We must wait and see what happens Andy. Nobody can see into the future. Only the progression.

Just stick to your plan Orby, Andy will tell you it's not raining when it clearly is. Those 250k girls were raped it's true and 100% did happen and Andy along with others here are either drunk on propaganda and lies or are here specifically to push it. Let these people FAFO themselves out of existence. No Andy I'm not going to respond to any snarky response asking for proof of my claims that you are wrong, I don't owe you shit.