Trump says he bombed Iran

[Knows]

Haven’t seen any evidence of that yet. Another Qanon fantasy?

Confusion Principle

[Astyanax]

Confusion Principle

I meant from the Iranians. Are you sober?

[Knows]

RattleTrap 1776 ??
[url=https://truthsocial.com/@derekjohnson][/url]@derekjohnson
   
Tariffs put into place January 23, 2018.
Not ONE SINGLE TARIFF was terminated from 2021———2025.
Not ONE SINGLE Obama, Bush, Clinton, appointed Judge tried to block a SINGLE TARIFF from 2021———2025.
It was displayed to the World from 2021———2023 that “Joe” had a Democrat CONTROLLED House of Representatives and Democrat CONTROLLED Senate.
How come the Presidential Authority Tariffs could NOT be terminated if they’re so detrimental to the Economy and Americans?
?? | 45 ——— 47 |
Military Operation
Military Occupation
Military Government
Continuity of Government
Government in Exile
Puppet Government
World History.
‘The Midnight Rider Rides Again.’

[Knows]

I meant from the Iranians. Are you sober?

It can go both ways. Silly. Cobra venom in your brain from a bite?

[EXETER]

RattleTrap 1776 ??
@derekjohnson
   
Tariffs put into place January 23, 2018.
Not ONE SINGLE TARIFF was terminated from 2021———2025.
Not ONE SINGLE Obama, Bush, Clinton, appointed Judge tried to block a SINGLE TARIFF from 2021———2025.
It was displayed to the World from 2021———2023 that “Joe” had a Democrat CONTROLLED House of Representatives and Democrat CONTROLLED Senate.
How come the Presidential Authority Tariffs could NOT be terminated if they’re so detrimental to the Economy and Americans?
?? | 

Trump tried to justify the tariffs he imposed in January 2018 under the trade expansion act of 1962. In 2025 Trump tried to justify his tariffs under the international emergency economic powers act. Those two different laws have different criteria for being legal. One set of tariffs can be legal and the other set might not.

Also, judges don’t “try to block” tariffs.  Judges make rulings on cases that are brought before them based on what the law and the constitution says. They have no ability to go out and proactively make rulings unless someone brings a case against someone else and it ends up in their court.

Maybe you slept through civics class in high school?

[chr0naut]

More like saying only those who invented the wheel have the right to drive or ride. Apparently this young person has never heard of the patent, copyright and other internationally accepted intellectual-property protection agreements that clearly define what a creator’s rights are and what they are not. Or perhaps they simply don’t acknowledge such rights and restrictions. They seem to be applying primary-school playground logic to social and international relations, a bit like Trump himself does.

Amusing that one who claims rarely to have seen a Muslim is so convinced they know all about Muslims while denying the insights of people who’ve lived and worked beside them, among them and even (in my case, as an adman in the UAE many, many years ago) under them. I have to admire such adamantine pride in one’s ignorance.

Just a quibble, but the UK did in fact receive help from the US to develop its nukes. However, the WW2 US nuclear programme enjoyed the benefit of all previous (secret) British nuclear research, which was shared with America and fed directly into the Manhattan project. As far as the other countries named are concerned, you’re absolutely right.

The British shared all their nuclear secrets with the USA, including materials, scientists, papers and classified documents. But the US classified and blocked all foreign access to everything, even for decades after Hiroshima (but the genie is totally out of the bottle now).

Los Alamos and Oak Ridge were deeply secret, even from most US scientists and military with above top secret clearance. The information was heavily compartmentalized.

By the way, I appreciate the nobility of your motives, and those of andy06shake, in trying to engage with this poster. Sadly I am not a charitable man, and obscurantism makes me angry.

The slow drip, drip, drip of water carves mighty boulders. And some are 'dumb as' - but probably only by great effort of will. It's a lifestyle choice...

[Knows]

Trump tried to justify the tariffs he imposed in January 2018 under the trade expansion act of 1962. In 2025 Trump tried to justify his tariffs under the international emergency economic powers act. Those two different laws have different criteria for being legal. One set of tariffs can be legal and the other set might not.

Also, judges don’t “try to block” tariffs.  Judges make rulings on cases that are brought before them based on what the law and the constitution says. They have no ability to go out and proactively make rulings unless someone brings a case against someone else and it ends up in their court.

Maybe you slept through civics class in high school?

It was displayed to the World from 2021———2023 that “Joe” had a Democrat CONTROLLED House of Representatives and Democrat CONTROLLED Senate.
How come the Presidential Authority Tariffs could NOT be terminated if they’re so detrimental to the Economy and Americans?
?? | 

[Astyanax]

It can go both ways. Silly. Cobra venom in your brain from a bite?

Show us when and how Iran has altered its position since the war's beginning.

[andy06shake]

RattleTrap 1776 ??
@derekjohnson
   
Tariffs put into place January 23, 2018.
Not ONE SINGLE TARIFF was terminated from 2021———2025.
Not ONE SINGLE Obama, Bush, Clinton, appointed Judge tried to block a SINGLE TARIFF from 2021———2025.
It was displayed to the World from 2021———2023 that “Joe” had a Democrat CONTROLLED House of Representatives and Democrat CONTROLLED Senate.
How come the Presidential Authority Tariffs could NOT be terminated if they’re so detrimental to the Economy and Americans?
?? | 45 ——— 47 |
Military Operation
Military Occupation
Military Government
Continuity of Government
Government in Exile
Puppet Government
World History.
‘The Midnight Rider Rides Again.’

Have you somehow mistaken trade policy for a Tom Clancy novel?

Trump's tariffs weren't removed because tariffs are politically useful, not because the US was secretly under "military government."

Biden kept many of them for the same reason politicians always keep bad policies alive, lobbying, domestic industry pressure, and fear of looking weak on China.

That's the boring reality, not cosplay.

And the rest is pure MAGA QAnon sludge.

"45-47" "government in exile" "military occupation" None of it means anything legally or constitutionally.

It's just vague enough to sound dramatic.

And stupid enough that followers can invent their own fantasy ending.

[Orby]

It's a stupid statement  as 100 years ago was 1926..... we didn't have the ability to drop bombs on that scale in that place.

Do you just go by what they told you in school? What I will advise is you study a little real British Imperial history. Find out what was really going on. Then you will find out we've being doing exactly s i said, bombing the ME / pakis / Afghan for 100 years. There is no other way to deal with them. just keep pounding them. Study how we attacked Iraq from the air straight after WW1, how we've been doing the with the Pathans in Pakistan or Afghan or whatever else they called it in the day, effectively a primitive society that just can't stop fighting. They don't do peace out there. Just war. That's how they like it. Do educate yourself as to the region and the relationships.