(04-10-2026, 12:15 AM)Bush Master Wrote: lol
[Image: https://i.imgur.com/Q5balME.jpeg]
And what was Trump doing at military age hmmm?
Hiding from Vietnam with bone spurs
(04-10-2026, 12:15 AM)Bush Master Wrote: lol And what was Trump doing at military age hmmm? Hiding from Vietnam with bone spurs
04-10-2026, 04:46 AM
(04-09-2026, 08:45 PM)cherokeetroy Wrote: https://x.com/ShadowofEzra/status/204240...96155?s=20 Oh come on. Using Alex Jones as a source is like using the National Enquirer.
04-10-2026, 04:49 AM
(04-09-2026, 11:55 PM)Bush Master Wrote: Well, a lot has changed...like night vision. Both places involve potential U.S. intervention in a complex region with strong national identity, difficult terrain, and risk of prolonged insurgency. The point isn't that they're identical. But that history shows how quickly limited involvement can escalate into a costly, unwinnable ground conflict. And night-vision advantage isn't decisive. America had overwhelming tech superiority in Vietnam and still lost due to the guerrilla tactics and terrain. Iran is larger, more mountainous, and more importantly, prepared...
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
04-10-2026, 05:46 AM
(04-09-2026, 10:30 PM)KrustyKrab Wrote: Moral of the story……. don’t deny nuclear inspectors and violate your agreement. That’s what kicked all of this off but no one did anything about it, so they continued business with impunity. That’s the deal we left correct? The inspectors were still going prior to that I believe. Are you confident we secure a better deal now? In what ways do you anticipate it will be better?
04-10-2026, 06:01 AM
(04-10-2026, 05:46 AM)CriticalStinker Wrote: That’s the deal we left correct? The inspectors were still going prior to that I believe. Iran was only showing the IAEA what Iran wanted to show them, when Iran felt like showing them. Zero transparency from Iran. Trust and verify? No trust and can’t verify anything. The IAEA still found 83.7% enriched uranium. Everything Iran told them was a lie. They were actively trying for nukes and had been doing so for decades. Trump had nothing to do with it. He’s been calling them out for it for decades just like the rest of the presidents before him. Difference is Trump did something about it. Trump put an end to Iran nukes. Now you may disagree on how he did that, but you can’t argue he didn’t in fact do it.
04-10-2026, 06:07 AM
What if the US placed a "NATO-tax" on their own oil? It would defray some of the cost of getting the world's tankers out of being held hostage in the Persian gulf and possibly keep domestic prices affordable. NATO knows the US is doing something and is sitting back.
04-10-2026, 06:13 AM
(04-10-2026, 06:01 AM)Vermilion Wrote: Iran was only showing the IAEA what Iran wanted to show them, when Iran felt like showing them. What was their enrichment rates when they were under their deal? When did the IAEA find that enrichment level? If Trump put and end to the Iran nuclear program, why is there uranium we need to get. Do you think we’re going to get a deal with more assurances than before?
04-10-2026, 06:27 AM
This post was last modified: 04-10-2026, 06:32 AM by cherokeetroy. 
(04-10-2026, 04:46 AM)David64 Wrote: Oh come on. Using Alex Jones as a source is like using the National Enquirer. If you're not following along, King Lear went on another intoxicated rant, crucifiying some of who were once his most avid supporters People who helped him get elected Alex Jones was one of those people so now Alex is turning against Trump Like many people are doing now Alex learned that you can be loyal to Trump but that doesn't mean he'll be loyal to you Trump is disloyal to everyone Trump is going to alienate everyone as more people abandon ship because his increasingly erratic behavior will become indefensible
04-10-2026, 06:29 AM
(04-10-2026, 06:07 AM)Solvedit Wrote: What if the US placed a "NATO-tax" on their own oil? It would defray some of the cost of getting the world's tankers out of being held hostage in the Persian gulf and possibly keep domestic prices affordable. NATO knows the US is doing something and is sitting back. NATO already contributes to Gulf security. But it's a defensive organisation. And it seems to me some kind of unilateral US "NATO-tax" would act like a tariff. And all that will serve to achieve is to raise global oil prices...
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads… | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| Iran is the Graveyard of American Hegemony | LightAngel | 67 | 3,563 |
05-19-2026, 09:45 PM Last Post: andy06shake |
|
| Jeffrey Sachs warns US militarism risks wider war over Iran | LightAngel | 3 | 571 |
03-10-2026, 08:40 PM Last Post: Hypntick |
|
| Iran fired 2 missiles at Greek Cyprus, hosting British troops | Waterglass | 26 | 1,417 |
03-04-2026, 09:31 AM Last Post: putnam6 |
|
| Iran’s new missile tactics throw US, Israeli war planning into disarray | Waterglass | 17 | 936 |
03-02-2026, 12:58 PM Last Post: Harte |
|
| Trump Announces Alaska Summit with Putin | Imhere | 763 | 34,407 |
08-19-2025, 08:56 PM Last Post: Encia22 |
|
| A powerful explosion at an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps base in Iran | putnam6 | 1 | 361 |
08-11-2025, 07:56 PM Last Post: andy06shake |
|
| Trump has moved two nuclear submarines towards Russia | Kurokage | 51 | 3,293 |
08-11-2025, 07:03 AM Last Post: SomeStupidName |
|
| How the Iran trap works | annonentity | 15 | 1,742 |
07-03-2025, 01:12 AM Last Post: annonentity |
|