207 |
5,408 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(03-18-2026, 05:07 PM)quintessentone Wrote: One reason I posted earlier for medical purposes, ... Nope. That's less than 20% needed.
Google AI assist -Uranium used for medical isotope production is typically enriched to less than 20% U-235, known as Low-Enriched Uranium (LEU). While some high-flux research reactors previously required Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU, >20%) to produce isotopes like Molybdenum-99, the majority of global production has transitioned to LEU to minimize proliferation risks
207 |
5,408 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(03-18-2026, 05:10 PM)quintessentone Wrote: Yet your government ignores Russia's and North Korea's threats at destroying your country as well, why do they get a pass?
Already answered this multiple times ... try to let it sink in ... those countries are CONTAINED. Iran is not.
57 |
10,167 |
| JOINED: |
Feb 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(03-18-2026, 05:10 PM)FlyersFan Wrote: Nope. That's less than 20% needed.
Google AI assist -Uranium used for medical isotope production is typically enriched to less than 20% U-235, known as Low-Enriched Uranium (LEU). While some high-flux research reactors previously required Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU, >20%) to produce isotopes like Molybdenum-99, the majority of global production has transitioned to LEU to minimize proliferation risks
The fact remains they used the 60% for that medical purpose whether or not less was needed. I think the IAEA went in there with preconceived concerns and biases and it went from there.
Like I said if Iran has nukes they would be screaming that fact from the rooftops to make everyone stop in their tracks.
"The only journey is the one within."
207 |
5,408 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(03-18-2026, 05:09 PM)andy06shake Wrote: Yeah, a lot of nations have that sort of enriched uranium for industrial purposes.
Already posted. Commercial/industrial purposes are at 3%.
Medical is less than 20%.
So no, industry doesn't need massive quantities of 60% enriched uranium.
110 |
6,066 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(03-18-2026, 05:11 PM)FlyersFan Wrote: Already answered this multiple times ... try to let it sink in ... those countries are CONTAINED. Iran is not.
Seems to me if Russia were contained, its armed forces would not currently be in the wrong postcode in Ukraine...
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
2 |
3,536 |
| JOINED: |
Mar 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(03-18-2026, 03:45 PM)RazorV66 Wrote: Come on, enough with these random clowns on X and their bullshit, no evidence opinions.
We have enough of that here.
Because we're not in a war with China for AI Supremacy?
207 |
5,408 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(03-18-2026, 05:12 PM)quintessentone Wrote: Like I said if Iran has nukes they would be screaming that fact from the rooftops to make everyone stop in their tracks. Like I said, no one said they had them.
They said their program was nearing completion.
And no, Iran wouldn't just scream it from the rooftops
(where they throw gay people off of).
They would launch from the rooftops and destroy Tel Aviv to let the world know.
207 |
5,408 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(03-18-2026, 05:14 PM)andy06shake Wrote: Seems to me if Russia were contained, its armed forces would not currently be in the wrong postcode in Ukraine... Its contained.
Russia and Ukraine is a contained war.
Russia isn't a threat to anyone else at this point.
207 |
5,408 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(03-18-2026, 05:12 PM)quintessentone Wrote: The fact remains they used the 60% for that medical purpose whether or not less was needed. No. That's not a fact. That's a claim.
They only needed to enrich to less than 20% for medical.
It's absurd to claim they'd enrich that much higher for no reason.
There was no reason to enrich to 60% unless it was for nuclear weapons.
51 |
4,129 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

(03-18-2026, 05:03 PM)ANNEE Wrote: Mathematical facts may be indisputable — but human’s are not.
It’s “in your face” consistent on this board that so called “facts” are chosen by the poster.
What may be a “fact” today — may not be tomorrow — at the whim of human inconsistencies.
No.
Facts are facts.
Truths and opinions are subjective.
Facts are objective.
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
|