Trump says he bombed Iran

[FlyersFan]

King Charles to make major speech on conflict.

HERE

[FlyersFan]

HERE

Trump says that the next Supreme Leader of Iran won't last long without his approval.

[CriticalStinker]

Did America start the conflict?
Or did Trump just peel the bandage off that was already a festering wound?
This war was going to happen anyways.
Iran wants it.   
Their entire economy, ideology, politics, society .. is based on going to war for their imaginary Mahdi.
The war was going to happen at some point anyways.  No getting around it.
Is it better to go now before they get their nukes ... or just wait until they get 
them and blast the hell out of millions of innocent people around the globe?
That's a good conversation to have.

That's what they said about Iraq, preemptive strike. Assuming it was going to happen.

Everyone said once Iran gets the materials needed, they'll use it to hit civilians. 

But then we took out their nuclear program, obliterated it... Remember? I know you do because you can go back in this thread (I think pages 60-80 somewhere) where you were clowning people who questioned whether or not the government was even telling the truth then.

Took them 27 years of Bibi telling us they were right around the corner, and we finally got them in the final hour. 

Yet recently, Witkoff said they were weeks away again, and had hundreds of KG of enriched uranium we said we had destroyed.

So why haven't they used a dirty bomb? Why are there vastly more civilian deaths in Iran than other nations? I thought they were hell bent on killing civilians.

Why should I believe the "official narrative" when they've been caught lying, been saying this for decades, and the people in power are literally profiting off of it?

Dick Cheney used to be the CEO of Halliburton, and they got no bid contracts in Iraq. You think he wasn't still holding on to stock options after being CEO? Now we have people with billions of dollars of interests, and you want me to believe Iran was inevitable, and would wipe out populations when they've had plenty of opportunity to knowing we were going to topple them?

I want you to take a step back, and really think about how any of that can make sense.

Or how the justification for this administration is "well the other guys did the same thing". Lady, he literally ran and won on "I'm going to drain the deep state", and now you're using deep state behavior to justify his.

He's got the record for federal debt also, not sure if I've brought that up in the thread. We're mortgaging the youth's future for all of this shit right now. And while you say it's worth it and inevitable, the majority of American's didn't want this. It's why they voted for every candidate that said they wouldn't do Iraq's since Iraq.

[andy06shake]

King Charles to make major speech on conflict.

HERE

Always thought he was a better listener with those lugs.

Dudes not exactly in touch with reality if you ask me.

And does not exactly understand the plight of the common man.

Let's hear what he has to say, all the same. 

Cheers for the link.

[FlyersFan]

That's what they said about Iraq, preemptive strike. Assuming it was going to happen.

Everyone said once Iran gets the materials needed, they'll use it to hit civilians. 

In this case it's Iran saying they are going to hit civilians ... they already are ...
and they'd wipe out Tel Aviv.   They advertise their intentions.

[FlyersFan]

Dudes not exactly in touch with reality if you ask me.

And does not exactly understand the plight of the common man.

He's an entitled brat totally out of touch who can't change his own socks.
Got his first wife murdered because he wouldn't keep his pants up and zipped
so she was out and about with Dodi ... 

But that's all discussion for a different thread ... 

I can't imagine he's going to have anything important or relevant to say.
How much influence does he really have over there in important matters?
I don't get why the people of England keep the royals around.
Sentiment?   Nostalgia?  Whatever ... it's their country so they can do what they want.

[andy06shake]

HERE

Trump says that the next Supreme Leader of Iran won't last long without his approval.

In that world through, said approval would also be an anchor around the neck.

It's about religion over there, and Trump's not a Muslim.

He has, however, been known to kill leaders of said religious persuasion.

I mean im not quite sure how he thinks thats going to go down.

But im apt to ponder like a lead balloon.

He would be better served to just say the one picked is the one he had in mind.

Can't see that working much nether all the same given the current predicament.

[FlyersFan]

It's about religion over there, and Trump's not a Muslim.

Yep.

He could keep killing off their leadership until they get to one that 
agrees to work with the world in a civilized manner, I suppose.
But to have effective change THE PEOPLE of Iran have to be able 
to have a say in who gets in charge.   That's something the religious
nutjob clerics don't want to happen.

He would be better served to just say the one picked is the one he had in mind.

He could save face that way.

[andy06shake]

How much influence does he really have over there in important matters?

Let's just say they own a lot of land, and/or own people who own a lot of land, etc...

As to how much influence, probably quite a bit that we are not ever going to be privy.

As to why we keep them, i don't think we have a better replacement in mind.

The UK is a constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary democracy.

It's freedom of a sorts, just like your own flavour. 

Does it have its issues and shortcomings? 

Given its age, most definitely so.

But there are far worse off places to exist around the globe...

[SteamyAmerican]

HERE

Trump says that the next Supreme Leader of Iran won't last long without his approval.

Whaaaa? It’s not about nukes, or being nice to your neighbors, or stability in the region, or joining the 21st century NWO….etc etc.

Regime change. Huh. How odd.

Who would’ve thought. Guess lulling the mullahs and the 86 year old leader into a false sense of security through faulty diplomacy was the only real courageous way to confront Israel’s greatest enemy. 

Good thing we’ve only sacrificed 6 soldiers. Ahem. If you don’t count Israel’s incursion into the Bekaa Valley where they got their ass kicked and defaulted to the Hannibal Directive.