207 |
5,408 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
(03-18-2026, 04:25 PM)quintessentone Wrote: IAEA found no nukes.
AGAIN - IAEA
They found 60-% enriched uranium.
Civilian uses only need 3%
They said Iran is one step away from nuclear weapons grade uranium.
Quote:This was Iran's explanation for 60% enriched uranium: 
207 |
5,408 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
(03-18-2026, 04:29 PM)quintessentone Wrote: I believe the old timers are fanatical with their Islamic laws there.
I already showed you that their Islamic laws allow lying to 'protect themselves' and 'at war'.
And just the fact that Iran enriched to 60% which is one step away from weapons grade
shows that they were lying. DUH.
57 |
10,165 |
| JOINED: |
Feb 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(03-18-2026, 04:34 PM)FlyersFan Wrote: I already showed you that their Islamic laws allow lying to 'protect themselves' and 'at war'.
And just the fact that Iran enriched to 60% which is one step away from weapons grade
shows that they were lying. DUH.
Again, the fact remains the IAEA did not find any nukes.
"The only journey is the one within."
17 |
5,559 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

(03-18-2026, 04:19 PM)FlyersFan Wrote: You said it has to be imminent.
That means the nukes have to be on the launcher.
Iran was imminent on getting nukes.
Close enough.
Ignoring that is suicide.
You know this, how?
Evidence?
Tulsi Gabbard?
Has she backed up your claim?
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope. Nothing...
504 |
6,234 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

I am assuming the objective of all this is to once and for all eliminate a toxic presence in the world.
Each "side" however, does have standing to call the other side "toxic."
So now the 'public' is expected to "take" sides...
the majority of whom are newcomers to this facet of this screwed up world...
first deep look... first impressions...
You might think I'm referring to the youthful and inexperienced...
I'm not old timers... I'm referring to you...
an entire universe of antecedent information regarding this "military" exploit went almost unreported...
perhaps, under-reported... it was never hidden.
Our traditional sources are perpetually suspect of skewed narrations, and embedded political intents...
"Activism" took the mantel of "lord and King" in our media all long ago...
and until recently remained unchecked. (BTW - Do you know who chooses to include what in the recording of history? They do. The media.)
Don't be so certain either side is righteous... even if we think them right.
They have NEVER been righteous... a fact they reaffirm with every narrative 'recorded.'
It's most likely "winner" marketing from the top to the bottom of the story.
Most of us clinging to media for the "vibe" of this war will get only "the media" vibe, a "product" with a "purpose" that too often has little to do with "reporting fact."
Many are mostly not even aware of the nature of the narratives they are bombarded with.
The 'narrative-crafting' gimmickry, distraction mechanics, it's all there.
Perhaps among those narratives are some truths...
but to acknowledge truth in war is a privilege of the game masters...
It's the principle reason things don't make sense, and we end up surprised.
(or more often we are "told" of our surprise by the media.)
war isn't ever about truth... it's all about people... always.
This virtue-dancing is all rendered down into a youth getting bombed, or starving out...
Some cluster of unfortunates being blasted out of existence...
Very DEI... come one, come all for we are right and you will die.
It's better to 'tell' our 'expediently truthful' narrative... and make it appear most virtuous to agree...
Ironic, because in "human" war... all lives matter...
in 'planning war' lives are a number to be offset by other numbers.
(It's why no 'true' war can never be 'won' by humans without constraining the definition of "win.")
207 |
5,408 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
(03-18-2026, 04:37 PM)quintessentone Wrote: Again, the fact remains the IAEA did not find any nukes.
Again the fact remains that the IAEA found 60% enriched uranium which is one step from weapons grade uranium, and civilian use only needs 3%. OBVIOUSLY Iran was enriching for nuclear weapons. Your Muslim cleric buddies lied. And you buy it.
207 |
5,408 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
(03-18-2026, 04:38 PM)Oldcarpy2 Wrote: You know this, how?
Every intelligence agency that matters, plus the IAEA, said Iran enriched to 60% which is one step from weapons grade uranium. Civilian use needs only 3%. It is a quick and easy jump from the 60% to weapons grade. Iran has said they would wipe out Israel, the USA, and our assets and allies. If you think for that Iran would have nukes and not use them, when for the past 47 years they have been attacking Israel and American interests in the area, then you haven't been paying attention.
The minute Iran got the nukes, Tel Aviv would be gone.
51 |
4,125 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(03-18-2026, 04:45 PM)FlyersFan Wrote: Every intelligence agency that matters, plus the IAEA, said Iran enriched to 60% which is one step from weapons grade uranium. Civilian use needs only 3%. It is a quick and easy jump from the 60% to weapons grade. Iran has said they would wipe out Israel, the USA, and our assets and allies. If you think for that Iran would have nukes and not use them, when for the past 47 years they have been attacking Israel and American interests in the area, then you haven't been paying attention.
The minute Iran got the nukes, Tel Aviv would be gone.
You're trying to use facts to debate people who still believe the Russian Pee Hoax and that J6 was an insurrection.
"You can play chess with a pigeon, but it'll just knock over the pieces and shit on the board."
-Taylor Swift
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
57 |
10,165 |
| JOINED: |
Feb 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(03-18-2026, 04:42 PM)FlyersFan Wrote: Again the fact remains that the IAEA found 60% enriched uranium which is one step from weapons grade uranium, and civilian use only needs 3%. OBVIOUSLY Iran was enriching for nuclear weapons. Your Muslim cleric buddies lied. And you buy it. 
The IAEA did find they did use 60% EU for medical purposes which in their estimation was beyond the required amount. Perhaps the people in the IAEA went in there with preconceived notions (?)
But, sure, it is true it is one step from weapons grade uranium, but there is no proof they had nuclear weapons.
Will they now? You bet because having nuclear weapons is the only deterrent, it appears, which elicits being ignored by warmongering countries and/or forces diplomatic negotiations.
"The only journey is the one within."
9 |
2,087 |
| JOINED: |
May 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(03-18-2026, 04:37 PM)quintessentone Wrote: Again, the fact remains the IAEA did not find any nukes.
It's hilarious how staunchly you will defend the religious zealots in Iran that will kill almost 40,000 of their own citizens for merely protesting.
Gays don't stand a chance in Iran, being gay there is a death sentence from the terrorists in charge.
That alone should be against everything you insane Liberals stand for.
How does it feel to be on the wrong side of every fucking thing?
|