Trump 'authorizing Full Force, if necessary' as military deploys to another US city

[putnam6]

Sounds like someone is moving over the target. No one is mentioning the elephant in the room: marijuana lawlessness. Did you know that was George Soro's first "project" in America, to legalize "weed"?

https://www.thestranger.com/weed/2019/04...galization

It's a fascinating read. What do all these lefty antifa types have in common? They're stoned off their gourds. Find a leftist rioter, and it's a virtual certainty that they "smoke pot", and think it's great and normal. This is not normal, this is the result of a deliberate drugging of the American population by a subversive billionaire.

Let's be clear — there is no such thing as "medical marijuana". It is a Schedule I Controlled Substance, with no medical application. Possession and distribution is illegal, period. Yet increasing leftist states have flaunted the law by pretending to "license" illegal drug cartels to operate "dispensaries" in their states. For some reason, Obama and Biden looked the other way. It's time for Trump to change that.

You might argue that this is a "states rights" issue. But that's not the case. The federal government has the power and obligation to regulate interstate commerce, Congress has made that clear. People drive across state lines to acquire these substances. They have them shipped interstate via mail. I've heard members (on 'other' forums, of course) brag about it. This is a violation of Federal Law, and a corrupting influence on society.

Imagine if someone invented "marijuana" today. A substance that makes you compliant and relaxed, has been shown to affect motor skills and mental capabilities, and for some reason has always been aligned with a scofflaw anti-American counter-culture. And imagine this hypothetical substance were introduced to a the United States by a foreign-born billionaire operating through shady financing and influence of the political system. Do you think we'd stand for it? No! Yet somehow America has been fed a romanticized idea of the "hippie 60s", of peace and love and flower-power. Sure, we see what that kind of leftism really is: black-clad masked rioters burning buildings. Go to one of these "protests"; I bet you'll smell marijuana.

And it's not "your grandaddy's weed". Modern marijuana has been selectively bred for its concentrated effects. Extracts are dozens of times more potent, with focused side effects, as the "wowie-maui" of the 1960s. Synthetics have been developed with truly horrifying effects, all under the banner of "legal weed".

It's time Trump got tough on this. Send in the National Guard. Shut these drug cartel distribution operations down. If Congress doesn't agree, well then, they can change the law. But the law is as the law is written, and ignoring it brings nothing but corruption to the Republic.

Yeah, Did you watch Reefer Madness recently 






thats so contrary to a mountain of evidence suggesting the opposite...and I know thats your thing

Marijuana use among teenagers is down, but is up for the Antifa age... which is why, lacking Soros' funding, these protests are weak sauce compared to the previous ones. No financing, no protesting

I would not be surprised if we have federally legal weed soon...

but for many, the alternatives are fine too...

[DBCowboy]

Yes. This is an opportunity for "two birds with one stone". Which is as it should be, if the problems are interlocked systems of illegal corruption, and one's actions are driven by principle.

Enforce the law in all cases, admit to the underlying biases preventing you from doing so things can proceed honestly, or step out of the way of those who will.

I think you understand this.

Ummmmmmmmmmmm, no one is above the law?

[UltraBudgie]

thats so contrary to a mountain of evidence suggesting the opposite...and I know thats your thing

Marijuana use among teenagers is down, but is up for the Antifa age... which is why, lacking Soros' funding, these protests are weak sauce compared to the previous ones. No financing, no protesting

I would not be surprised if we have federally legal weed soon...

but for many, the alternatives are fine too...

I see, so your theory is that Mr Soros is funding an entire plethora of socially corrupting causes and institutions, fomenting lawlessness and anti-Americanism at every turn, except where he has pushed through legal weed — that's cool.

Might you have a subjective bias in this?

And the vast and overwhelming evidence—produced with a large dollop of marijuana cartel funding and political agenda bias— such sources are now entirely trustworthy? I'm not seeing a double-standard in contrast with people here's opinion on the objectivity of Big Pharma and COVID research at all (sarcasm).

I know it might be a bitter pill, but could you consider that perhaps weed, like meth, ketamine, and the "party drugs" so popular with the left, might not be a neutral social influence? That they might be in fact (gasp!) part of a weaponized plot by those who would see American society corroded?

But even that is a moot point, as DB pointed out. They are clearly illegal by Federal law, and that is as far as the debate needs to go. Enforce the law.

[DBCowboy]

  They are clearly illegal by Federal law, and that is as far as the debate needs to go. Enforce the law.

This.

Yet democrats fight this.

They are actually against this.

[putnam6]

I see, so your theory is that Mr Soros is funding an entire plethora of socially corrupting causes and institutions, fomenting lawlessness and anti-Americanism at every turn, except where he has pushed through legal weed — that's cool.

Might you have a subjective bias in this?

And the vast and overwhelming evidence—produced with a large dollop of marijuana cartel funding and political agenda bias— such sources are now entirely trustworthy? I'm not seeing a double-standard in contrast with people here's opinion on the objectivity of Big Pharma and COVID research at all (sarcasm).

I know it might be a bitter pill, but could you consider that perhaps weed, like meth, ketamine, and the "party drugs" so popular with the left, might not be a neutral social influence? That they might be in fact (gasp!) part of a weaponized plot by those who would see American society corroded?

But even that is a moot point, as DB pointed out. They are clearly illegal by Federal law, and that is as far as the debate needs to go. Enforce the law.

Yeah, that all sounds like paranoid contrarian budgie droppings...

So you want the National Guard to enforce marijuana laws...

At least that would motivate more of the locals to get involved in the protesting than they are now.

[UltraBudgie]

So you want the National Guard to enforce marijuana laws...

No. I would like Americans to wake up and not drug themselves into stupification and compliance or destructive radicalism. That is my personal preference, I know we live in a democracy and such things are a matter of opinion as well as evidence.

I would like it acknowledged what the law is, and that pretending it does not exist does not make it go away, and is in fact dangerous to civil society. I advocate for lawmakers to enact the people's will as I see it, but where they have chosen to act otherwise, I feel we must accept reality. Schedule I drugs are illegal. Unauthorized immigration is illegal.

I would like local law enforcement to do their jobs, without political bias.

I would like State governments to acknowledge both their state laws, and Federal law. We cannot hold together as a nation unless this is so.

I would like the Federal government to do what is necessary to hold this Republic together.

Shut down the drug distribution hubs. End the trafficking. Stop funding and enabling crime.

[putnam6]

No. I would like Americans to wake up and not drug themselves into stupification and compliance. That is my personal preference, I know we live in a democracy and such things are a matter of opinion as well as evidence.

I would like it acknowledged what the law is, and that pretending it does not exist does not make it go away, and is in fact dangerous to civil society. I advocate for lawmakers to enact the people's will, but where they have chosen to act otherwise, I feel we must accept reality. Schedule I drugs are illegal. Unauthorized immigration is illegal.

I would like local law enforcement to do their jobs, without political bias.

I would like State governments to acknowledge both their state laws, and Federal law. We cannot hold together as a nation unless this is so.

I would like the Federal government to do what is necessary to hold this Republic together.

Shut down the drug distribution hubs. End the trafficking. Stop funding and enabling crime.

The previous post was made possible
in whole or in part by 

We still got all the pills for all your ills

[UltraBudgie]

The previous post was made possible
in whole or in part by 

[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...784600.gif]
We still got all the pills for all your ills

One of the few things I think Scientologists are right about is the utter evil that psychiatric drugs can be. They believe advertising them directly to the general public is part of an agenda to pathologize discontent and avoid addressing society-wide problems. So do I. There are very few cases, such as in alternative to lobotomization or institutionalization, where their use is clearly warranted, in my opinion. I feel our medical system has become compromised to always push pills at problems, rather than address causes. The corruption of money is there, and has been seen.

A sane society would not need to stone itself every night and drink itself into a stupor every weekend. A sane society would not look to doctors to drug its problems away. A sane society would not profit off the suffering of those it makes ill.

Let's be a sane society. That's all I ask. And it begins with respecting the rule of law, and being honest about why much of society does not.

Change does not happen without ideologically clear action. Shutter the illegal dispensaries. Eliminate the illegal use of trafficked immigrant labor. Stop allowing the exploitation of children, migrants, the poor, and ourselves, for the gods of other people's money and power. Defend the borders, and brook no corruption that subverts that goal, from man or State.

[putnam6]

One of the few things I think Scientologists are right about is the utter evil that psychiatric drugs can be. They believe advertising them directly to the general public is part of an agenda to pathologize discontent and avoid addressing society-wide problems. So do I. There are very few cases, such as in alternative to lobotomization or institutionalization, where their use is clearly warranted, in my opinion. I feel our medical system has become compromised to always push pills at problems, rather than address causes. The corruption of money is there, and has been seen.

A sane society would not need to stone itself every night and drink itself into a stupor every weekend. A sane society would not look to doctors to drug its problems away. A sane society would not profit off the suffering of those it makes ill.

Let's be a sane society. That's all I ask. And it begins with respecting the rule of law, and being honest about why much of society does not.

Change does not happen without ideologically clear action. Shutter the illegal dispensaries. Eliminate the illegal use of trafficked immigrant labor. Stop allowing the exploitation of children, migrants, the poor, and ourselves, for the gods of other people's money and power. Defend the borders, and brook no corruption that subverts that goal, from man or State.

Does the prohibition include the "demon rum"

[UltraBudgie]

Does the prohibition include the "demon rum"

No just things that are, um, actually currently prohibited by law.

But I may be convinced that it would be a good idea to require a psychiatrist's note before allowing access to this stuff: