0 |
1,810 |
| JOINED: |
Jul 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

Remember that time our fascist president sent in his federal goons over the objections of a democrat governor?
I do….
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Wallace
307 |
6,504 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

10-06-2025, 05:02 PM
This post was last modified: 10-06-2025, 06:05 PM by putnam6. 
In other news, I didn't hear this WBW
So we can put to rest the questioning of
" Are foreign interests financing protest groups in America?
Quote:Geepers808
@GeepersNFT
BLM spent at least $12M on luxury properties in LA and Toronto Patrisse Cullors and BLM leaders spent money raised from the George Floyd protests on tailored suits, parties, and mansions. In October 2020, Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation (BLMGNF) secretly bought a sprawling mansion in Los Angeles, spending nearly $6 million on the purchase of the Studio City compound, which includes a soundstage, six bedrooms and a swimming pool. In Canada, Toronto-based non-profit M4BJ purchased a 10,000-square-foot downtown property for the equivalent of $6.3 million. The former headquarters of the Canadian communist party was named the Wildseed Centre for Art and Activism by Canadian BLM members who said it was purchased using cash from BLMGNF.
Quote: - The post by
@TRHLofficial
mocks a report of Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation suing the Tides Foundation for allegedly withholding $33.4 million in donations, using laughter to underscore irony in activist group funding disputes.
- The lawsuit, filed in California Superior Court in May 2024, claims breach of oral contract over funds raised post-2020 George Floyd protests, with Tides countering that BLMGNF mismanaged grants; no resolution as of October 2025.
- Tides, a progressive fiscal sponsor receiving Open Society Foundations grants, exemplifies tensions in nonprofit ecosystems where intermediaries control billions, per Philanthropy.com analysis of 2020-2023 flows exceeding $1 billion to racial justice causes.
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
9 |
2,087 |
| JOINED: |
May 2024 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

(10-06-2025, 05:02 PM)putnam6 Wrote: In other news, I didn't hear this WBW
So we can put to rest the questioning of
" Are foreign interests financing protest groups in America?
[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...55-991.jpg]
 
The Liberals that have been lying to us about this for over 10 years really should fucking apologize to us.
Soros has been funding all these anti-American assholes in an attempt to destroy this country.
141 |
6,418 |
| JOINED: |
Sep 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(10-06-2025, 06:18 PM)RazorV66 Wrote: 
The Liberals that have been lying to us about this for over 10 years really should fucking apologize to us.
Soros has been funding all these anti-American assholes in an attempt to destroy this country.
Sounds like someone is moving over the target. No one is mentioning the elephant in the room: marijuana lawlessness. Did you know that was George Soro's first "project" in America, to legalize "weed"?
Quote:The Little-Known Story of Marijuana Legalization
How billionaire George Soros and a few of his friends gave us bongs full of legal weed.
It's an interesting story that few people know, and it begins with George Soros....
The three billionaires who formed the core of Nadelmann's funding network—Soros, Sperling, and Lewis—spent more than $70 million on pot reform over the next 20 years, according to a 2017 report from National Families in Action, and Nadelmann delivered a 20-year string of pot-reform victories that have pushed the United States to the precipice of full legalization.
How much credit do we owe these three billionaires? For Jonathan Caulkins, a drug policy researcher at Carnegie Mellon University, the answer is straightforward. "The simplest explanation of why marijuana reform happened is that three billionaires decided it should happen and they bankrolled the process for many, many years," Caulkins said.
Caulkins's confidence behind his claim makes a lot more sense when you realize how drastically the world has changed since Nadelmann first sat down with Soros. In 1992, nearly 80 percent of Americans said pot should be fully illegal... https://www.thestranger.com/weed/2019/04...galization
It's a fascinating read. What do all these lefty antifa types have in common? They're stoned off their gourds. Find a leftist rioter, and it's a virtual certainty that they "smoke pot", and think it's great and normal. This is not normal, this is the result of a deliberate drugging of the American population by a subversive billionaire.
Let's be clear — there is no such thing as "medical marijuana". It is a Schedule I Controlled Substance, with no medical application. Possession and distribution is illegal, period. Yet increasing leftist states have flaunted the law by pretending to "license" illegal drug cartels to operate "dispensaries" in their states. For some reason, Obama and Biden looked the other way. It's time for Trump to change that.
You might argue that this is a "states rights" issue. But that's not the case. The federal government has the power and obligation to regulate interstate commerce, Congress has made that clear. People drive across state lines to acquire these substances. They have them shipped interstate via mail. I've heard members (on 'other' forums, of course) brag about it. This is a violation of Federal Law, and a corrupting influence on society.
Imagine if someone invented "marijuana" today. A substance that makes you compliant and relaxed, has been shown to affect motor skills and mental capabilities, and for some reason has always been aligned with a scofflaw anti-American counter-culture. And imagine this hypothetical substance were introduced to a the United States by a foreign-born billionaire operating through shady financing and influence of the political system. Do you think we'd stand for it? No! Yet somehow America has been fed a romanticized idea of the "hippie 60s", of peace and love and flower-power. Sure, we see what that kind of leftism really is: black-clad masked rioters burning buildings. Go to one of these "protests"; I bet you'll smell marijuana.
And it's not "your grandaddy's weed". Modern marijuana has been selectively bred for its concentrated effects. Extracts are dozens of times more potent, with focused side effects, as the "wowie-maui" of the 1960s. Synthetics have been developed with truly horrifying effects, all under the banner of "legal weed".
It's time Trump got tough on this. Send in the National Guard. Shut these drug cartel distribution operations down. If Congress doesn't agree, well then, they can change the law. But the law is as the law is written, and ignoring it brings nothing but corruption to the Republic.
51 |
4,104 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

And we still are.
Stuck because leftists are against arresting child traffickers, rapists and murderers
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
141 |
6,418 |
| JOINED: |
Sep 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(10-06-2025, 07:11 PM)DBCowboy Wrote: And we still are.
Stuck because leftists are against arresting child traffickers, rapists and murderers
Yes. Let the troops do their job. And realize this is a two-front war: the international drug cartels and the domestic enablers who are in clear violation of Federal Law. Shut down the chemical warfare hubs that are allowed to flourish in California, Oregon, and other insurrectionist states. We can't keep pretending these are two separate issues.
51 |
4,104 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(10-06-2025, 07:18 PM)UltraBudgie Wrote: Yes. Let the troops do their job. And realize this is a two-front war: the international drug cartels and the domestic enablers who are in clear violation of Federal Law. Shut down the chemical warfare hubs that are allowed to flourish in California, Oregon, and other insurrectionist states. We can't keep pretending these are two separate issues.
Stop obfuscating.
Local police could arrest, local DA's could prosecute these criminals, if they weren't leftist douche-tards
We wouldn't NEED ICE, or Nat'l Guard.
The leftists are failing to follow or obey the law.
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
141 |
6,418 |
| JOINED: |
Sep 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(10-06-2025, 07:22 PM)DBCowboy Wrote: Stop obfuscating.
Local police could arrest, local DA's could prosecute these criminals, if they weren't leftist douche-tards
We wouldn't NEED ICE, or Nat'l Guard.
The leftists are failing to follow or obey the law.
Who is obfuscating? Perhaps you are, because it is clear to me and others.
Both the illegal immigration and illegal drug issue are a matter of states presuming the unilateral right to flout established Federal law. That is corrosive to our Republic.
The Venn diagram of intersection is obvious, both in theory and manifestation. Look at these people!
Or do you just want to keep smoking mind-altering Libertarian weed?
51 |
4,104 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(10-06-2025, 07:27 PM)UltraBudgie Wrote: Who is obfuscating? Perhaps you are, because it is clear to me and others.
Both the illegal immigration and illegal drug issue are a matter of states presuming the unilateral right to flout established Federal law. That is corrosive to our Republic.
The Venn diagram of intersection is obvious, both in theory and manifestation. Look at these people!
Or do you just want to keep smoking mind-altering Libertarian weed?
I'm simple.
Sorta stupid.
Kinda slow.
Leftists aren't prosecuting, leftists aren't arresting criminals.
QED?
You must develop the ability to be disliked in order to free yourself from the prison of other people's opinions.
141 |
6,418 |
| JOINED: |
Sep 2024 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(10-06-2025, 07:30 PM)DBCowboy Wrote: I'm simple.
Sorta stupid.
Kinda slow.
Leftists aren't prosecuting, leftists aren't arresting criminals.
QED?
Yes. This is an opportunity for "two birds with one stone". Which is as it should be, if the problems are interlocked systems of illegal corruption, and one's actions are driven by principle.
Enforce the law in all cases, admit to the underlying biases preventing you from doing so things can proceed honestly, or step out of the way of those who will.
I think you understand this.
|