If I may:
(04-10-2025, 12:33 PM)AngryOldBrewer Wrote: We "know" Soros, Beezos, Murdoch and Dimon do shady things like attempted market manipulation without any smoking gun.
I have no reason to doubt this. Market manpulation is why they are "venerated."
(Venerated the same way as those who successfully managed to fix the 1919 World Series)
(04-10-2025, 12:33 PM)AngryOldBrewer Wrote: Why make the assumption that Trump would not?
I made no such assumption.
I have no objection to accepting a danger of abuse exists.
Only that you have to prove it before you can damn the accused.
(04-10-2025, 12:33 PM)AngryOldBrewer Wrote: He is rich and thinks of himself as untouchable, just like the above mentioned.
Affluence shouldn't make anyone "suspect." That's seems biased.
And frankly, I can't attest to how Trump "thinks of himself."
To say anything about what someone else thinks is kind of something
a person chooses to 'buy' into
I have discovered that a "true social choice" can never be defined
by anyone other than the chooser.
An unspoken boundary of what true social choice is.
I am willing to discover, but not choose yet.
You are aware that these same vulnerabilities were exploited
and pursued - sometimes even created and nurtured by
people you might feel uncomfortable considering within your imagery..
(... but appearances can be misleading
when taken at face value. As some have learned.)
(04-10-2025, 12:33 PM)AngryOldBrewer Wrote: What is it about Trump that make people think he is above all the things we "know" other rich people do? I certainly wouldn't call him perfect, and I think we all agree he is a "stretcher of truth" or "great story teller" but not someone we can wholly trust.
The few who might think these things are zealot partisan activists...
Just
who have you been listening to lately?
As I have said to my European friends, just because we are not freaking out like the media in Europe does, it doesn't mean we don't know, aren't watching... still openly discussing what we see...
I guess you can't say I suffer from effervescent optimism... but.... that's encouraging, at any rate.
He
is a storyteller. He seems a 'good/effective' negotiator.
Perhaps he really won't be bullied by this monstrosity we "embrace" as "the Media,"
he's willing to let them "play" themselves.
(or at least, so it appears...

, I've given up trying to figure out
what's theater and what "true" in reporting.)