Shots Fired at White House Correspondants Dinner

[KrustyKrab]

Typically, it's the 2nd Amendment that gets attacked after a shooting incident 

Trump's going after the 1st Amendment, instead

https://x.com/WhiteHouse/status/20488088...44362?s=20

[Image: https://i.imgur.com/40RoPw3.jpeg]

He’s certainly not wrong.  Are you not aware that not all hate speech is covered by the 1st?

Speech not covered which absolutely applies to the recent assassination attempt. 

So….what part of the first is Trump going after?

 

• “Speech inciting imminent lawless action
  
• Fighting words that provoke immediate violence
  
• True threats aimed at instilling fear of bodily harm or death
  
• Obscenity, though defining it involves community standards
  
• Defamation, with a higher bar for public figures
  
• Harassment, defined as unwelcome conduct severe enough to impact someone's environment
  
• Speech causing substantial disruption, particularly in educational settings”
  

[ReturnofBroccoli]

[Image: https://denyignorance.com/action/serious.png]

Figured id have to make an example, let us know how you feel when you come out

[cherokeetroy]

He’s certainly not wrong.  Are you not aware that not all hate speech is covered by the 1st?

Speech not covered which absolutely applies to the recent assassination attempt. 

So….what part of the first is Trump going after?

 

• “Speech inciting imminent lawless action
  
• Fighting words that provoke immediate violence
  
• True threats aimed at instilling fear of bodily harm or death
  
• Obscenity, though defining it involves community standards
  
• Defamation, with a higher bar for public figures
  
• Harassment, defined as unwelcome conduct severe enough to impact someone's environment
  
• Speech causing substantial disruption, particularly in educational settings”
  

Is Trump, himself, guilty of any of that?

[David64]

[cherokeetroy]

You're talking to a group of people who are all for Freedom of Speech....as long as you're saying what they want to hear. You're infringing on their Rights only when it limits what THEY can say.

Otherwise they want it banned.

Quote me stating I want any speech banned

[ReturnofBroccoli]

[Image: https://denyignorance.com/action/serious.png]

Thx for stopping by hope you feel better tomorrow

[quintessentone]

Looks like he was ready to kill anyone who got in his way. Twist that however you like, but he said it himself.

 

Highest ranking would be Trump, he was after Trump first and the why is in his manifesto.

It's obvious to me that he was delusional thinking he could get by security in the first place.

[quintessentone]

Is Trump, himself, guilty of any of that?

Trump and Levitt are pushing the divisive demonization of the Left right now but not about what this perp's manifesto states about Trump being a rapist, pedophile etc., rather that the Left and media are calling him a Fascist. If anything he's turning Socialist through government intervention in corporations.

[ReturnofBroccoli]

If anyone else wants a

and a 24 hour suspension feel free to continue being uncivilized

Exercise a little self control is all we are asking here

[ANNEE]

Is Trump, himself, guilty of any of that?

Absolutely!
 

• “Speech inciting imminent lawless action
  
• Fighting words that provoke immediate violence
  
• True threats aimed at instilling fear of bodily harm or death
  
• Obscenity, though defining it involves community standards
  
• Defamation, with a higher bar for public figures
  
• Harassment, defined as unwelcome conduct severe enough to impact someone's environment
  
• Speech causing substantial disruption, particularly in educational settings”