27 |
2,059 |
| JOINED: |
May 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(08-31-2025, 12:33 PM)andy06shake Wrote: You have already been provided the police report.
Where does the police report say the guy called the cops. And who called the cops. And why.
I’ll type slower.
Still doesn’t answer who called. If the guy called. And if the call was because of the video being posted.
It’s established the guy filming the teenagers posted the video. Is that not fact.
The video was posted by the guy after the girls told him to stop following and filming. Is that not fact.
Do you have any evidence the guy filling the video called the cops before posting the video. Which begs the question why the video wasn’t obtained at that time for evidence. The girls names haven’t been released. I doubt the guy would have been allowed to keep the video for uploading if he called the cops and showed them the video before uploading.
Do you have any evidence they guy called the cops at all.
Do you have any evidence the cops showered up other than the video was reported to them.
62 |
2,167 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

08-31-2025, 12:42 PM
This post was last modified: 08-31-2025, 12:46 PM by Kurokage. 
(08-31-2025, 12:38 PM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: Still doesn’t answer who called. If the guy called. And if the call was because of the video being posted.
It’s established the guy filling the teenagers posted the video. Is that not fact.
The video was posted by the guy after the girls told him to stop following and filming. Is that not fact.
Do you have any evidence the guy filling the video called the cops before posting the video. Which begs the question why the video wasn’t obtained at that time for evidence. The girls names haven’t been released. I doubt the guy would have been allowed to keep the video for uploading if he called the cops and showed them the video before uploading.
Do you have any evidence they guy called the cops at all.
Do you have any evidence the cops showered up other than the video was reported to them.
Are you really expecting the police to reveal who called them to a scene of a 12 year girl brandishing weapons?? Are you really that uneducated that you think police instantly release the names of those who called them?
The police arrived on scene to a Bulgarian couple, and a 12 year old girl carrying an axe and knife was arrested!!!
Edited to add....
This is about as close as you get to be given names in the UK, unless it's deemed necessary by the authorities.
https://www.standard.co.uk/
Quote:Chief superintendent Nicola Russell, who is responsible for Police Scotland’s Tayside division, issued a statement on Wednesday.
She said: “We are aware of misinformation being shared on social media in relation to an incident where a Bulgarian couple were approached by youths in St Ann Lane, Dundee, on Saturday 23 August 2025.
“A 12-year-old girl has been charged with being in possession of offensive weapons. She will be referred to the relevant authorities and our inquiries are ongoing.
"Denial is a common tactic that substitutes deliberate ignorance for thoughtful planning."
Charles Tremper
17 |
5,558 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(08-31-2025, 12:38 PM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: Still doesn’t answer who called. If the guy called. And if the call was because of the video being posted.
It’s established the guy filming the teenagers posted the video. Is that not fact.
The video was posted by the guy after the girls told him to stop following and filming. Is that not fact.
Do you have any evidence the guy filling the video called the cops before posting the video. Which begs the question why the video wasn’t obtained at that time for evidence. The girls names haven’t been released. I doubt the guy would have been allowed to keep the video for uploading if he called the cops and showed them the video before uploading.
Do you have any evidence they guy called the cops at all.
Do you have any evidence the cops showered up other than the video was reported to them.
At this point, I have to ask, who cares?
It is, what it is.
Respectfully suggest that you stop flogging a very deceased horse?
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope. Nothing...
110 |
6,055 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

(08-31-2025, 12:42 PM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: Where does the police report say the guy called the cops. And who called the cops. And why.
I’ll type slower.
Still doesn’t answer who called. If the guy called. And if the call was because of the video being posted.
It’s established the guy filming the teenagers posted the video. Is that not fact.
The video was posted by the guy after the girls told him to stop following and filming. Is that not fact.
Do you have any evidence the guy filling the video called the cops before posting the video. Which begs the question why the video wasn’t obtained at that time for evidence. The girls names haven’t been released. I doubt the guy would have been allowed to keep the video for uploading if he called the cops and showed them the video before uploading.
Do you have any evidence they guy called the cops at all.
Do you have any evidence the cops showered up other than the video was reported to them.
Where does the Police report say YouTube informed Police?
Nowhere i can see.
You get that this would take time, right?
Did they come out the next day, no!
Uniformed Police attended a call from the man or another member of the public and jailed the little ned.
If it's any consolation, they probably just took her home, because you can't interview a child or charge them without a appropriate adult being present.
Which is just something else that you dont know or fail to comprehend.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
27 |
2,059 |
| JOINED: |
May 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(08-31-2025, 12:42 PM)Kurokage Wrote: Are you really expecting the police to reveal who called them to a scene of a 12 year girl brandishing weapons?? Are you really that uneducated that you think police instantly release the names of those who called them?
The police arrived on scene to a Bulgarian couple, and a 12 year old girl carrying an axe and knife was arrested!!!
Still doesn’t answer what was posted.
“Do you have any evidence the guy filling the video called the cops before posting the video. Which begs the question why the video wasn’t obtained at that time for evidence. The girls names haven’t been released. I doubt the guy would have been allowed to keep the video for uploading if he called the cops and showed them the video before uploading.”
If the guy called the cops how did he still have the video to upload? I would think the cops would have obtained that for chain of custody.
If the guy called, it was after posting the video with never sharing the media with the cops.
Where there is till no evidence the guy called the cops. Where all reports are correct the incid was reported to the cops because it went viral.
62 |
2,167 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(08-31-2025, 12:46 PM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: Still doesn’t answer what was posted.
“Do you have any evidence the guy filling the video called the cops before posting the video. Which begs the question why the video wasn’t obtained at that time for evidence. The girls names haven’t been released. I doubt the guy would have been allowed to keep the video for uploading if he called the cops and showed them the video before uploading.”
If the guy called the cops how did he still have the video to upload? I would think the cops would have obtained that for chain of custody.
If the guy called, it was after posting the video with never sharing the media with the cops.
Where there is till no evidence the guy called the cops. Where all reports are correct the incid was reported to the cops because it went viral.
Wow, have you ever heard of being able to send video via e-mail or messenger??
The police have stated....
Quote: ......Bulgarian couple were approached by youths in St Ann Lane, Dundee, on Saturday 23 August 2025.
“A 12-year-old girl has been charged with being in possession of offensive weapons. She will be referred to the relevant authorities and our inquiries are ongoing.
"Denial is a common tactic that substitutes deliberate ignorance for thoughtful planning."
Charles Tremper
27 |
2,059 |
| JOINED: |
May 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

08-31-2025, 12:49 PM
This post was last modified: 08-31-2025, 12:50 PM by WallFlowerActive. 
(08-31-2025, 12:45 PM)andy06shake Wrote: Where does the Police report say YouTube informed Police?
Which has nothing to do with somebody reporting because of it being posted on YouTube.
again.
If the guy called the cops how did he still have the video to upload? I would think the cops would have obtained that for chain of custody.
If the guy called, it was after posting the video with never sharing the media with the cops.
110 |
6,055 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

(08-31-2025, 11:48 AM)ReturnofBroccoli Wrote: They have similar programs like that in the court systems of the US a so called "teen court" if you will where they have to plead guilty in order to attend but the jury are fellow teen offenders of teen court etc its kind of silly and usually involves "petty crimes" I would scold them but I wouldnt convict them. Maybe I would send her to therapy thats about it. I think she needs lessons in civility and its possible she may have trouble at home maybe social work should be a thing
I think you are calling it rather clearly.
And nobody wishes to see real charges for racially aggravated assault with two offensive weapons applied to a 12-year-old.
As that's the kind of thing that can follow you all the way throughout life.
Get her the help she needs, and educate her would be my thinking on the matter also.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
110 |
6,055 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
ONLINE
|

(08-31-2025, 12:49 PM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: Which has nothing to do with somebody reporting because of it being posted on YouTube.
again.
If the guy called the cops how did he still have the video to upload? I would think the cops would have obtained that for chain of custody.
If the guy called, it was after posting the video with never sharing the media with the cops.
It's just circles now with someone who refuses to accept the facts.
Facts that have been established, whether or not you choose to recognise them or not.
If you dont have something interesting to contribute, im apt to just let you stumble on in the dark on your todd.
Have fun, because the video is evidence, never mind a matter of public record, and the children's panel will see it, if they have not done so already.
"Yet so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind that walk the high-road of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend."
62 |
2,167 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(08-31-2025, 12:49 PM)WallFlowerActive Wrote: Which has nothing to do with somebody reporting because of it being posted on YouTube.
again.
If the guy called the cops how did he still have the video to upload? I would think the cops would have obtained that for chain of custody.
If the guy called, it was after posting the video with never sharing the media with the cops.
Please tell us all were you're getting your secret information from that the police were alerted because of a YouTube video??
"Denial is a common tactic that substitutes deliberate ignorance for thoughtful planning."
Charles Tremper
|