Release All Files! - Part 2

[Oldcarpy2]

  Oh hun ... all the chatter you do about America this and America that ...
and here you tell someone to stay in their own lane?   Comeon .... 

I will stick with asking about US depravity and corruption being revealed.

Or not, so it would seem?

Apologies, I am  a mere foreigner.

Hun.

[FlyersFan]

It's 2026. Most documents, for the past couple of decades, have generally been digital, especially if they’re emails, texts, or composed on a computer or smartphone.

Digital copies ... sure.
But you said 'transcribed'.
That means something different to me then just digital copies.
That means someone took the time to go over the document 
and make a new document saying what the original document
said .. and putting that new document on a new format.

Maybe I"m getting confused with the words being used.

[CriticalStinker]

Man, you can contrarian Columbo this till the cows come home, not to mix metaphors...
 

[Image: https://media0.giphy.com/media/BqmMllWNawKs0/giphy.gif]
The TV station didnt vet the source?
A police officer didnt do proper paperwork? like thats never happened before

But as Hillary suggested  

[Image: https://i.imgur.com/B04pERQ.gif]

Democrats have held on to this bone so long they are going to die with it clenched in thier teeth...

Why, because Any Means Necessary... they meant it then, and they mean it now

Earlier in the thread I noted that FBI tips posted here shouldn’t be taken as evidence because some of them were anonymous, and none were corroborated.

This claim is not verified by any paperwork or any other source either.

Fair is fair.

I don’t see how one officers word would counter a whole administration who has been dishonest at times, lied outright at times, and made explicitly clear they want nothing more than this to be put to bed.

Ive stayed consistent on this issue for years. I’ve never been hyperbolic in saying “Trump is a pedo” or even said he’s associated with the financial crimes. I’ve merely said that his admin has engaged in the same as previous in trying to put this away before more in the donor class get exposed.

More evidence points to a cover up than a whistle blowing. 

The ones playing contrarian are the ones implying this is all a hoax with nothing else to see. And that’s after all the proven dishonesty and lies from people in power.

As to the “by any means possible”, I haven’t made this political. I’ve shown another member I’ve blamed all in power from 2019 at ATS, and haven’t singled out just one party. I think both parties would be implicated should a real investigation and trial take place.

The head of the FBI and DOJ have been far more political than me. Bondi said people had TDS today for asking question. Think about that, the attorney general who is supposed to work for the American people is showing political bias while Americans get accused of bias for demanding justice on a heinous case.

The same Americans who have known about this and been consistent for almost a decade.

Make that make sense.

[andy06shake]

Digital copies ... sure.
But you said 'transcribed'.
That means something different to me then just digital copies.
That means someone took the time to go over the document 
and make a new document saying what the original document
said .. and putting that new document on a new format.

Maybe I"m getting confused with the words being used.

 

---

Anything written down by hand would need to be "transcribed," but that won't amount to millions of copies.
 
Digital copies, on the other hand, well, we all know how easily those tend to accumulate.

If in doubt, check your emails.

How many times a year do we empty those? Or does the email account need to be emptied?
 
I’m a couple of times a year, and I'm boring. LOL
 
Don't imagine teams of people sitting there with black Sharpies and a ruler.

I get confused with words all the time, so...

But finding out how many have been used is easy with digital documents, simply by using the "Ctrl F" command. 

You type in the word. 

It will number them and take you to every instance at the touch of a key.

[Bush Master]

Dark

Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna has seen the unredacted files…

[putnam6]

Earlier in the thread I noted that FBI tips posted here shouldn’t be taken as evidence because some of them were anonymous, and none were corroborated.

This claim is not verified by any paperwork or any other source either.

Fair is fair.

I don’t see how one officers word would counter a whole administration who has been dishonest at times, lied outright at times, and made explicitly clear they want nothing more than this to be put to bed.

Ive stayed consistent on this issue for years. I’ve never been hyperbolic in saying “Trump is a pedo” or even said he’s associated with the financial crimes. I’ve merely said that his admin has engaged in the same as previous in trying to put this away before more in the donor class get exposed.

More evidence points to a cover up than a whistle blowing. 

The ones playing contrarian are the ones implying this is all a hoax with nothing else to see. And that’s after all the proven dishonesty and lies from people in power.

As to the “by any means possible”, I haven’t made this political. I’ve shown another member I’ve blamed all in power from 2019 at ATS, and haven’t singled out just one party. I think both parties would be implicated should a real investigation and trial take place.

The head of the FBI and DOJ have been far more political than me. Bondi said people had TDS today for asking question. Think about that, the attorney general who is supposed to work for the American people is showing political bias while Americans get accused of bias for demanding justice on a heinous case.

The same Americans who have known about this and been consistent for almost a decade.

Make that make sense.

So who are the 28 co-conspirators, oops 27 because thats what you're labeling Trump... I'm fine with that, who else?
Wexner
Andy
Clinton

Who else?

You did see where some of the co-conspirators listed were actually girls who were trafficked, and then did the same to others.

Can we expect Kamala/Gavin to run on the promise that they will release the Epstein files in 2028, since it worked so well for Trump?

One can be shady, scuzzy, skeevy, but will still need the evidence of co-conspirator guilt, Frank, and we are running out of files to be released.

So far Im thinking Trump covered forIsrael/Mossad/Ehud's involvement pretty much like every other admin. There's no evidence he was with any girls or women in a criminal way. I can't find evidence that he ever got Epstein's famous massages or a hummer from Ghislaine

[cherokeetroy]

Bondi said people had TDS today for asking question. 

She discredited herself when she did this

Accusations of "Trump Derangement syndrome" or the "orange man bad" thing is MAGAs equivalent to the left's "everyone is Hitler/a Nazi"

The purpose is to shut down debate/discussion

[CriticalStinker]

So who are the 28 co-conspirators, oops 27 because thats what you're labeling Trump... I'm fine with that, who else?
Wexner
Andy
Clinton

Who else?

You did see where some of the co-conspirators listed were actually girls who were trafficked, and then did the same to others.

Can we expect Kamala/Gavin to run on the promise that they will release the Epstein files in 2028, since it worked so well for Trump?

One can be shady, scuzzy, skeevy, but will still need the evidence of co-conspirator guilt, Frank, and we are running out of files to be released.

So far Im thinking Trump covered forIsrael/Mossad/Ehud's involvement pretty much like every other admin. There's no evidence he was with any girls or women in a criminal way. I can't find evidence that he ever got Epstein's famous massages or a hummer from Ghislaine

I don’t know who they are, because of the illegal redactions.

Congressmen found a document listing a possible labled co conspirator who was redacted and forced the DOJ to follow the law and show the unredacted name (Les Wexner).

The original sweetheart deal Epstein got also gave immunity to 4 named co conspirators and any potential co conspirators.

This isn’t new or unique to this admin which I’ve consistently noted.

Just because other admins ran cover doesn’t make it OK now. It just means this is bigger than watergate because it doesn’t just involve one admin. And if this admin actively ran cover, it means at the very least other admins tried to ignore it.

[SteamyAmerican]

I don’t know who they are, because of the illegal redactions.

Congressmen found a document listing a possible labled co conspirator who was redacted and forced the DOJ to follow the law and show the unredacted name (Les Wexner).

The original sweetheart deal Epstein got also gave immunity to 4 named co conspirators and any potential co conspirators.

This isn’t new or unique to this admin which I’ve consistently noted.

Just because other admins ran cover doesn’t make it OK now. It just means this is bigger than watergate because it doesn’t just involve one admin. And if this admin actively ran cover, it means at the very least other admins tried to ignore it.

Spot on as usual CS.

Didn’t know the sweetheart deal extended to other and the potentiality of others.

Except for the fact they were running cover for Administrations that were directly involved and maybe even taking orders indirectly from JE according to some emails.

[CriticalStinker]

Spot on as usual CS.

Didn’t know the sweetheart deal extended to other and the potentiality of others.

Except for the fact they were running cover for Administrations that were directly involved and maybe even taking orders indirectly from JE according to some emails.

I appreciate that.

The original sweetheart deal was absolutely f***ed, pardon my French.

Every aspect of it was wild. He got to plea down, has some work release, immunity to everyone aside from him. In fact, that is the basis of Maxwells appeal to the Supreme Court, the original immunity deal.

It shouldn’t have been allowed to stand either, because victims are supposed to be informed of potential deals, and they were not. Not to mention the shit show between whether it would be prosecuted federally or at a state level.

Ultimately there’s too many rich, powerful, and potential spy aspects to the whole case for any politician to want to touch it. But it shouldn’t be up to them, it should be up to a justice system that doesn’t care about politics. But we clearly don’t have that, and haven’t for who knows how long.

Many of these people are more willing to protect their friends, donors, and business mates than admit there was a cover up on countless kids of working class Americans and foreigners seen as hunting grounds for the elite. And that’s just the most shocking element, it doesn’t begin to touch insider trading and policy making based on profit of the elite.