Release All Files! - Part 2

[chr0naut]

The BBC selectively edited Trumps speech to make it look like he said something that he didn't.  They made it look like he was calling for lawless violent action when he was not.   They did it with intent.   They tried to socially engineer the audience through fraud.   They are guilty.   Only a lemming would try to justify what the BBC did.

Why not?

A lot of what he says is just nonsense. He can't finish sentences and changes topic mid-sentence.

You have to edit what he says to get a coherent thought out of him.

The White House often edits his stuff to make it comprehensible.

Here's the full unedited speech:

[Oldcarpy2]

Are you asking US to get involved into your UK political business? Blink twice if you need our help....

Absolutely not


Why would you think that?

Musk did.  So did Trump 

We didn't ask them to.

We treated them with any possible due respect.

[chr0naut]

Somebody check AIs algorithim

Grok, Chat GPT etc. are all wrong on this story and are spreading dangerous misinfornation.

Thankfully DI has a strong foreign element to guide Uncle Sam in these troubled times

https://x.com/i/grok/share/3272257259e04...ff6dff8e18

In that speech several times, Trump said the election was stolen.

It's been investigated. It wasn't stolen.

The reason he got them to walk down to the Capitol was to protest against accepting the election result.

He also said he would walk with them, but he didn't.

And how does "we fight, we fight like hell" sound like peaceful protest?

Also, he is doing it again right now. Suggesting that the Republican Party should be the electoral arbiters and that state elections should be Federally controlled (which, in part, they already are) and that the mid-terms are not neccesary.

And remember the "No Kings" protests. What do you think they were on about?

[cherokeetroy]

Epstein was a Triple Agent global Intelligence Operative secret Super Spy

But there's no client list!

[cherokeetroy]

Several major banks and financial executives faced significant fines, settlements, and reputational damage due to their business relationships with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The penalties were largely based on failures to monitor suspicious transactions, known as "Know Your Customer" (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance failures. Here are the key instances of bankers and institutions fined or penalized because of their ties to Epstein: 1. Deutsche Bank ($150M Fine + $75M Settlement) 

• Regulatory Fine: In July 2020, New York banking regulators fined Deutsche Bank $150 million for failing to properly monitor Epstein's account activity between 2013 and 2018. The bank was criticized for ignoring "red flags," including large cash withdrawals ($800,000+), payments to Russian models, and transactions to individuals implicated in his sex trafficking operation.
  
• Victim Settlement: In May 2023, Deutsche Bank agreed to pay $75 million to settle a class-action lawsuit brought by Epstein victims who accused the bank of knowingly facilitating his sex trafficking operation to generate profits.
  
• CEO Admission: Deutsche Bank CEO Christian Sewing acknowledged it was a "critical mistake" to take on Epstein as a client in 2013. 
  

 2. JPMorgan Chase ($290M+ Settlement) 

• Victim Settlement: In June 2023, JPMorgan Chase agreed to pay roughly $290 million to settle a class-action lawsuit filed on behalf of Epstein victims.
  
• Allegations: The lawsuit alleged that the bank ignored warnings about Epstein's behavior because he was a valuable client who brought in other wealthy clients.
  
• Internal Failures: Investigations revealed that despite internal concerns regarding his status as a convicted sex offender, the bank processed over $1 billion in transactions for him. 
  

 3. Jes Staley (Barclays/JPMorgan)

• Regulatory Ban & Fine: In October 2023, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) fined former Barclays CEO Jes Staley and banned him from senior roles in the financial services industry.
  
• Cause: The probe found that Staley had misled regulators about the nature of his relationship with Epstein, having previously served as a senior executive at JPMorgan while managing the Epstein relationship. 
  

 4. Other Legal Actions

• Bank of America: Legal teams for victims have also filed suits against Bank of America and the Bank of New York (BNY) for alleged ties to Epstein's financial activities, with claims that they failed to uphold anti-money laundering
  

This will get you started if you put in the time.

Checkmate By Derek Johnson

White Hats in Control!

[ANNEE]

To be clear the BBC didn’t change Trump’s words. 

It was a splicing edit.

[chr0naut]

Is this a serious reply? I mean yeah, pretty common in the emails….lulz.

Also Comet Ping Ping and QAnon are so passé. We are onto the actual emailed receipts from playboy/financier/sex trafficker JE. So, yeah. There’s that.

if so I’ll play anyway.

I ALWAYS email my high-end friends after a “yummy pizza party with the littlest naughty girls keeping me up all night.”

Did I do this right?

:/

QAnon' s Pizzagate stuff appears to be the original source for idea that the word 'pizza' was a code-word for pedophilia, where they falsely claimed that the FBI in New York had 'decoded' it from Anthony Weiner's emails.

[CriticalStinker]

I'm not saying not to got after them, in fact you get bonus points for each one you get. I want the people here in the US that are a part of it to arrested and indited too. I'm not in that position to make that happen, if the pieces at play can't find a way to make it happen then some of those pieces will change soon the question is, will their replacements be better, worse or the same.

I think it’s pretty clear nothing will happen, and they’ll do everything they can to make sure it stays that way.

Kash and Bongino both made their fame and money being hawkish on the Epstein case while they were in podcasting. Then they turned into two of the biggest sweep of under the rug people we’ve seen. Kash has lied to congress (whether intentional or not), and has been more establishment about this than anyone I can think of.

Bondi, well, I don’t even really know what she does.

[ANNEE]

Why not?

A lot of what he says is just nonsense. He can't finish sentences and changes topic mid-sentence.

You have to edit what he says to get a coherent thought out of him.

The White House often edits his stuff to make it comprehensible.

Here's the full unedited speech:
[Video: https://youtu.be/8vXEWBenMJY]

I never listen to Trump. 

I only read transcripts. The ones I manage to get through. 

I’ll never make fun of “W” again. 

[cherokeetroy]

And people are almost laughing it off. Which, for places like X or Facebook doesn’t surprise me as much, but from the former ATS crowd it is surprising. One of the few things on that site almost everyone agreed on, go after those involved whoever they are.

I think the mockery and attitude of nonchalance is a spontaneous reaction of self-defense 

The goal instantly shifted from demands for transparency & justice to protecting Trump’s honor from the moment Trump called the Epstein files a Democrat hoax