0 |
1,810 |
| JOINED: |
Jul 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(03-02-2026, 05:51 AM)FlyersFan Wrote: What do you mean, why? You can't just fire someone and throw them in jail based on suspicion or accusations. You have to prove it in a court of law. Innocent until proven guilty. And Trump gets the same rights as everyone else.
Sometimes you are a riot. 
In their defense, they don’t have a real constitution so guilty by mob rule maybe the way they roll down there.
On the other hand, the so called American posters on here professing anybody’s guilt without evidence should be ashamed of themselves.
17 |
5,557 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

Which Country are you referring to?
As for professing guilt without proof, Obama, Biden, (insert name of your favourite hated Liberal etc)?
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope. Nothing...
207 |
5,408 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|
(03-02-2026, 11:43 AM)Oldcarpy2 Wrote: As for professing guilt without proof, Obama, Biden, (insert name of your favourite hated Liberal etc)?
That foreigner poster said that Trump should lose his job and be tossed in jail based on accusations and without a trial. I don't know w hat country he's from but that's not how things work in this country.
17 |
5,557 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(03-02-2026, 11:47 AM)FlyersFan Wrote: That foreigner poster said that Trump should lose his job and be tossed in jail based on accusations and without a trial. I don't know w hat country he's from but that's not how things work in this country.
Oh
I didn't see that post.
Obviously, I believe in due process
'l'll just check my Giveashitometer....Nope. Nothing...
62 |
2,167 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

It looks again like an attempt at covering up what was happening within DOJ and the Epstein files...
https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/
Quote:Epstein's Zorro Ranch probe collapsed after Trump DOJ seized control; newly unsealed records show.
Newly unsealed federal records reveal how a New Mexico sex trafficking investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's desert estate was dismantled from the inside, and how the Department of Justice that was supposed to pick up the case may have buried it instead.
Documents released under theEpstein Files Transparency Act, signed into law in November 2025, show that New Mexico state investigators handed police reports, recorded witness interviews and other evidence to federal prosecutors in 2019 on the promise of a coordinated, multistate prosecution that never arrived.
Now, with New Mexico reopening its criminal inquiry and a newly formed legislative truth commission armed with subpoena power, a reckoning is finally taking shape, one that raises direct questions about what the Trump-era Department of Justice did with what it was given.
A 'One-Way Relationship' That Gutted New Mexico's CaseIn the summer of 2019, federal prosecutors from theU.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York asked New Mexico to stand down. The instruction, according to former New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas, was framed as a practical necessity, running parallel investigations risked producing inconsistent witness statements that defence attorneys could exploit at trial. New Mexico agreed to cease its investigation into sex trafficking at Epstein's 7,500-acre Zorro Ranch, located roughly 50 kilometres south of Santa Fe, and to hand everything over to the federal team.
By 17 September 2019, barely six weeks after Epstein's death in a federal detention facility on 10 August, then-Chief Deputy Attorney General Clara Moran had alreadysent a package to federal prosecutors containing police reports, recorded witness interviews, inter-agency correspondence, and documents related to Epstein's leasing of state public lands.
New Mexico had also cancelled a lease by an Epstein-owned company on 1,243 acres of state trust land adjacent to the ranch, land investigators believed Epstein had obtained specifically to enhance the property's privacy.
Federal prosecutors, however, gave nothing back. Balderas, who now serves as president of Northern New Mexico College in Española, told the Albuquerque Journal that the arrangement had been 'a one-way relationship.' He said prosecutors had 'made the representation that they were going to prosecute with a multijurisdictional, multistate focus,' but that he remains unaware of any information provided to New Mexico that could have supported criminal charges in the state. The US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York did not respond to requests for comment.
The Ranch Was Never Seized — Despite Formal RequestsThe story did not end with New Mexico's 2019 capitulation. In July 2020, Balderas's office sent a letter to federal prosecutors, signed by Moran and now part of theunsealed records, urging them to seize Zorro Ranch through civil forfeiture to preserve criminal evidence, including files and video recordings.
The letter argued that the ranch 'was used by Epstein and others to facilitate the commission and prolonged concealment of his trafficking of children' and that seizure should proceed alongside the then-ongoing criminal prosecution of Epstein's associates and co-conspirators.
"Denial is a common tactic that substitutes deliberate ignorance for thoughtful planning."
Charles Tremper
504 |
6,234 |
| JOINED: |
Dec 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(03-02-2026, 01:14 PM)Kurokage Wrote: It looks again like an attempt at covering up what was happening within DOJ and the Epstein files...
https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/
But it does bear mentioning that the particular DOJ of which you speak, actively worked against their President.
This is known as fact... reported, verified in documentation, and testified in court.
How is this "in service of THAT President?"
It's practically an admission that they were participating in political intrigue, rather than justice...
the inquiry is sound, the execution of the investigation is automatically suspect from that DOJ.
I have no sympathy for the perpetrators of this kind of abuse (and most others) ...
Were he a participant in all this human-destroying entertainment... let him face the law.
The one-note "la-la-la" of anti-trump fixated journalism lost it's persuasiveness... by their own hands.
But those stuck in 20th century populism and marketing simply won't accept that they are in fact the "stupid people" in this equation. Politicians yak and antic, sponsors dump money into 'telling the people how 'we all' feel."
It's tired, old, and transparent.
4 |
508 |
| JOINED: |
Jun 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

It is shocking that American lives were lost in this so-called "war", all due to Trump's desire to suppress any more Epstein accusations. Those who deny this are only fooling themselves, considering a victim who was 13 at the time accused Trump of rape, and then he responds by bombing Iran over false pretenses. The intelligence community has even indicated there was no imminent threat to US soldiers, effectively revealing that Trump is lying.
6 |
1,595 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(03-02-2026, 05:51 AM)FlyersFan Wrote: What do you mean, why? You can't just fire someone and throw them in jail based on suspicion or accusations. You have to prove it in a court of law. Innocent until proven guilty. And Trump gets the same rights as everyone else.
Sometimes you are a riot. 
Trump HAS been convicted. There are all sorts of jobs that one cannot do if they are convicted. Apparently the POTUS isn't one of those jobs.
And a sitting President has immunity from prosecution, and can issue pardons. So, not the same rights as everyone else.
Even under the Constitution the President is constrained from some things, but Trump has, several times, done those things anyway (fixing tariffs, sending in policing troops against the wishes of state authorities and acts of war, etc).
6 |
1,595 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

(03-02-2026, 02:32 PM)Truthhurts Wrote: [quote="Truthhurts" pid='137225' dateline='1772479946']
It is shocking that American lives were lost in this so-called "war", all due to Trump's desire to suppress any more Epstein accusations. Those who deny this are only fooling themselves, considering a victim who was 13 at the time accused Trump of rape, and then he responds by bombing Iran over false pretenses. The intelligence community has even indicated there was no imminent threat to US soldiers, effectively revealing that Trump is lying.
Not too many weeks previously, Trump had declared that he had totally destroyed Iran's ability to produce atomic weapons. Now, here is Trump, once again, saying that his attacks are to stop Iran from getting the bomb.
And now he says that the war will likely take weeks - so much for a decisive victory.
Qatar has turned off supplies of LNG to the world, oil prices everywhere are already skyrocketing, the Straits of Hormuz are all but closed and there have been missile and drone strikes into several countries. It's shaping up to be another 'forever war' in the Middle East.
All because Trump cannot negotiate and because he needs a distraction from what has recently been revealed in the Epstein files.
307 |
6,505 |
| JOINED: |
Nov 2023 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

Hillary
Bill
His mind was not for rent to any god or government
Always hopeful yet discontent, knows changes aren't permanent
But change is
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
|