(03-01-2026, 02:52 PM)Oldcarpy2 Wrote: You go first. Like your proof about your cannibalism claims, etc,?
May I ask...
People make claims.... if I say a person made a claim... why is it up to me to prove that claim made?
Don't mistake my observation as criticism please...
It's just when more and more people whisper the same thing...
It seem prudent to at least understand the claim.
Personally... meaning It's just my opinion...
Everything built around slavery and exploitation of innocence is
exactly human cannibalism...
the subject is consumed... (at least innocence is thus 'sacrificed' to an evident manner of "consumption.")
But furnaces exist for a reason.
Evidence has to be captured to be 'reported.'
Claims are just hearsay, after all.
The claimant could possibly be lying, incorrect, misled, or any other thing that makes people say things contrary, as 'wishful thinking' or as a 'narrative' component of fact.
I would catalogue the claims first, not by claimant... but by evidence.
Surely some of these allegations have some weight... to be reported as they were.
... within the context of the events discussed...